llvm-project

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Stephen Lin	c89a0ececb	Fixup to r186268 and r186269: don't append -LABEL to CHECK-NOT. No functionality change. llvm-svn: 186271	2013-07-14 02:10:57 +00:00
Stephen Lin	c1c7a1309c	Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change. This update was done with the following bash script: find test/Transforms -name ".ll" \| \ while read NAME; do echo "$NAME" if ! grep -q "^; RUN: llc" $NAME; then TEMP=`mktemp -t temp` cp $NAME $TEMP sed -n "s/^define [^@]@\([A-Za-z0-9_]\)(.$/\1/p" < $NAME \| \ while read FUNC; do sed -i '' "s/;\(.\)\([A-Za-z0-9_]\):\( \)@$FUNC\([( ]\)\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3@$FUNC(/g" $TEMP done mv $TEMP $NAME fi done llvm-svn: 186268	2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00
Dale Johannesen	3059924bdd	When considering whether to inline Callee into Caller, and that will make Caller too big to inline, see if it might be better to inline Caller into its callers instead. This situation is described in PR 2973, although I haven't tried the specific case in SPASS. llvm-svn: 83602	2009-10-09 00:11:32 +00:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Stephen Lin

c89a0ececb

Fixup to r186268 and r186269: don't append -LABEL to CHECK-NOT. No functionality change.

llvm-svn: 186271

2013-07-14 02:10:57 +00:00

Stephen Lin

c1c7a1309c

Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change.

This update was done with the following bash script:

  find test/Transforms -name "*.ll" | \
  while read NAME; do
    echo "$NAME"
    if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc" $NAME; then
      TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
      cp $NAME $TEMP
      sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
      while read FUNC; do
        sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\):\( *\)@$FUNC\([( ]*\)\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3@$FUNC(/g" $TEMP
      done
      mv $TEMP $NAME
    fi
  done

llvm-svn: 186268

2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00

Dale Johannesen

3059924bdd

When considering whether to inline Callee into Caller,

and that will make Caller too big to inline, see if it
might be better to inline Caller into its callers instead.
This situation is described in PR 2973, although I haven't
tried the specific case in SPASS.

llvm-svn: 83602

2009-10-09 00:11:32 +00:00

3 Commits