The "unexpected value" message only matters to me, but is bound to make the experience more confusing for people when some uninitialized memory looks like an NSNumber and then can't be formatted properly, and that error comes out in the UI
Just drop the error message entirely - nobody but me cares
llvm-svn: 205978
Enable data formatters to see-through pointers/references to typedefs
For instance, if Foo is a typedef to Bar, and there is a formatter for any/all of Bar*, Bar&, Bar&&, then Foo*, Foo&, and Foo&& should pick these up if Foo-specific formatters don't exist
llvm-svn: 205939
This is a purely mechanical change explicitly casting any parameters for printf
style conversion. This cleans up the warnings emitted by gcc 4.8 on Linux.
llvm-svn: 205607
This is a mechanical change addressing the various sign comparison warnings that
are identified by both clang and gcc. This helps cleanup some of the warning
spew that occurs during builds.
llvm-svn: 205390
For some reason, the libc++ vector<bool> data formatter was essentially a costly no-up, doing everything required of it, except actually generating the child values!
This restores its functionality
llvm-svn: 205259
This is a mechanical cleanup of unused functions. In the case where the
functions are referenced (in comment form), I've simply commented out the
functions. A second pass to clean that up is warranted.
The functions which are otherwise unused have been removed. Some of these were
introduced in the initial commit and not in use prior to that point!
NFC
llvm-svn: 204310
read during materialization. First of all, report
if we can't read the data for some reason. Second,
consult the ValueObject's error and report that if
there's some problem.
<rdar://problem/16074201>
llvm-svn: 202552
Revert the spirit of r199857 - a convincing case can be made that overriding a summary's format markers behind its back is not the right thing to do
This commit reverts the behavior of the code to the previous model, and changes the test case to validate the opposite of what it was validating before
llvm-svn: 201455
Provide a filter for libc++ std::atomic<T>
This just hides some implementation clutter and promotes the actual content to only child status
llvm-svn: 200984
The many many benefits include:
1 - Input/Output/Error streams are now handled as real streams not a push style input
2 - auto completion in python embedded interpreter
3 - multi-line input for "script" and "expression" commands now allow you to edit previous/next lines using up and down arrow keys and this makes multi-line input actually a viable thing to use
4 - it is now possible to use curses to drive LLDB (please try the "gui" command)
We will need to deal with and fix any buildbot failures and tests and arise now that input/output and error are correctly hooked up in all cases.
llvm-svn: 200263
ValueObjectPrinter could enter an infinite loop while trying to display an aptly formed ValueObject: a reference, with a child of some pointer type, such that the pointees chain ended up pointing back to some part of itself - a pointer to itself being the simplest such case
Fixed here by only setting a pointer depth when needed, and ensuring that we won't overflow and wrap the pointer depth when it's zero.
llvm-svn: 200247
The "type format add" command gets a new flag --type (-t). If you pass -t <sometype>, upon fetching the value for an object of your type,
LLDB will display it as-if it was of enumeration type <sometype>
This is useful in cases of non-contiguous enums where there are empty gaps of unspecified values, and as such one cannot type their variables as the enum type,
but users would still like to see them as-if they were of the enum type (e.g. DWARF field types with their user-reserved ranges)
The SB API has also been improved to handle both types of formats, and a test case is added
llvm-svn: 198105
TypeFormatImpl used to just wrap a Format (and Flags for matching), and then ValueObject itself would do the printing deed
With this checkin, the responsibility of generating a value string is centralized in the data formatter (as it should, and already is for summaries)
This change is good practice per se, and should also enable us to extend the type format mechanism in a cleaner way
llvm-svn: 197874
So, rename the class for what it truly is: a FormattersContainer
Also do a bunch of related text substitutions in the interest of overall naming clarity
llvm-svn: 197795
Rework data formatters matching algorithm
What happens now is that, for each category, the FormatNavigator generates all possible matches, and checks them one by one
Since the possible matches do not actually depend on the category (whether a match is accepted or not does, but that check can be shifted at a more convenient time),
it is actually feasible to generate every possible match upfront and then let individual categories just scan through those
This commit changes things by introducing a notion of formatters match candidate, and shifting responsibility for generating all of them given a (ValueObject,DynamicValueType) pair
from the FormatNavigator back to the FormatManager
A list of these candidates is then passed down to each category for matching
Candidates also need to remember whether they were generated by stripping pointers, references, typedefs, since this is something that individual formatters can choose to reject
This check, however, is conveniently only done once a "textual" match has been found, so that the list of candidates is truly category-independent
While the performance benefit is small (mostly, due to caching), this is much cleaner from a design perspective
llvm-svn: 195395
Change the NSSet data formatter to not use the expression parser to produce synthetic children
In small-scale experimentation with lldb-perf, this improves our performance by around 25%
llvm-svn: 195294
It completes the job of using EvaluateExpressionOptions consistently throughout
the inferior function calling mechanism in lldb begun in Greg's patch r194009.
It removes a handful of alternate calls into the ClangUserExpression/ClangFunction/ThreadPlanCallFunction which
were there for convenience. Using the EvaluateExpressionOptions removes the need for them.
Using that it gets the --debug option from Greg's patch to work cleanly.
It also adds another EvaluateExpressionOption to not trap exceptions when running expressions. You shouldn't
use this option unless you KNOW your expression can't throw beyond itself. This is:
<rdar://problem/15374885>
At present this is only available through the SB API's or python.
It fixes a bug where function calls would unset the ObjC & C++ exception breakpoints without checking whether
they were set by somebody else already.
llvm-svn: 194182
pure virtual base class and made StackFrame a subclass of that. As
I started to build on top of that arrangement today, I found that it
wasn't working out like I intended. Instead I'll try sticking with
the single StackFrame class -- there's too much code duplication to
make a more complicated class hierarchy sensible I think.
llvm-svn: 193983
defines a protocol that all subclasses will implement. StackFrame
is currently the only subclass and the methods that Frame vends are
nearly identical to StackFrame's old methods.
Update all callers to use Frame*/Frame& instead of pointers to
StackFrames.
This is almost entirely a mechanical change that touches a lot of
the code base so I'm committing it alone. No new functionality is
added with this patch, no new subclasses of Frame exist yet.
I'll probably need to tweak some of the separation, possibly moving
some of StackFrame's methods up in to Frame, but this is a good
starting point.
<rdar://problem/15314068>
llvm-svn: 193907
User-vended by-type formatters still would prevail on these hardcoded ones
For the time being, while the infrastructure is there, no such formatters exist
This can be useful for cases such as expanding vtables for C++ class pointers, when there is no clear cut notion of a typename matching, and the feature is low-level enough that it makes sense for the debugger core to be vending it
llvm-svn: 193724
Introduce a new boolean setting enable-auto-oneliner
This setting if set to false will force LLDB to not use the new compact one-line display
By default, one-line mode stays on, at least until we can be confident it works.
But now if it seriously impedes your workflow while it evolves/it works wonders but you still hate it, there's a way to turn it off
llvm-svn: 193450
This check was overly strict. Relax it.
While one could conceivably want nested one-lining:
(Foo) aFoo = (x = 1, y = (t = 3, q = “Hello), z = 3.14)
the spirit of this feature is mostly to make *SMALL LINEAR* structs come out more compact.
Aggregates with children and no summary for now just disable the one-lining. Define a one-liner summary to override :)
llvm-svn: 193218
Extend DummySyntheticProvider to actually use debug-info vended children as the source of information
Make Python synthetic children either be valid, or fallback to the dummy, like their C++ counterparts
This allows LLDB to actually stop bailing out upon encountering an invalid synthetic children provider front-end, and still displaying the non synthetized ivar info
llvm-svn: 192741
Formats (as in "type format") are now included in categories
The only bit missing is caching formats along with synthetic children and summaries, which might be now desirable
llvm-svn: 192217
This radar extends the notion of one-liner summaries to automagically apply in a few interesting cases
More specifically, this checkin changes the printout of ValueObjects to print on one-line (as if type summary add -c had been applied) iff:
this ValueObject does not have a summary
its children have no synthetic children
its children are not a non-empty base class without a summary
its children do not have a summary that asks for children to show up
the aggregate length of all the names of all the children is <= 50 characters
you did not ask to see the types during a printout
your pointer depth is 0
This is meant to simplify the way LLDB shows data on screen for small structs and similarly compact data types (e.g. std::pair<int,int> anyone?)
Feedback is especially welcome on how the feature feels and corner cases where we should apply this printout and don't (or viceversa, we are applying it when we shouldn't be)
llvm-svn: 191996
DumpValueObject() 2.0
This checkin restores pre-Xcode5 functionality to the "po" (expr -O) command:
- expr now has a new --description-verbosity (-v) argument, which takes either compact or full as a value (-v is the same as -vfull)
When the full mode is on, "po" will show the extended output with type name, persistent variable name and value, as in
(lldb) expr -O -v -- foo
(id) $0 = 0x000000010010baf0 {
1 = 2;
2 = 3;
}
When -v is omitted, or -vcompact is passed, the Xcode5-style output will be shown, as in
(lldb) expr -O -- foo
{
1 = 2;
2 = 3;
}
- for a non-ObjectiveC object, LLDB will still try to retrieve a summary and/or value to display
(lldb) po 5
5
-v also works in this mode
(lldb) expr -O -vfull -- 5
(int) $4 = 5
On top of that, this is a major refactoring of the ValueObject printing code. The functionality is now factored into a ValueObjectPrinter class for easier maintenance in the future
DumpValueObject() was turned into an instance method ValueObject::Dump() which simply calls through to the printer code, Dump_Impl has been removed
Test case to follow
llvm-svn: 191694
Enrico Granata