With this patch, lld creates a .note.GNU_stack and adds that to an
output file if it is creating a re-linkable object file (i.e. if -r
is given). If we don't do this, and if you use GNU linkers as a final
linker, they create an executable whose stack area is executable,
which is considered pretty bad these days.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51400
llvm-svn: 340902
Relanding r340564, original commit message:
Fixes the handling of *_DS relocations used on DQ-form instructions where we
were overwriting some of the extended opcode bits. Also adds an alignment check
so that the user will receive a diagnostic error if the value we are writing
is not properly aligned.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51124
llvm-svn: 340832
Looking at the current implementation and algorithm description,
it does not seem we need to keep vector with all edges for
each cluster and can just remember the best one. This is NFC change.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50609
llvm-svn: 340806
This reverts commit 5125b44dbb5d06b715213e4bec75c7346bfcc7d3.
ppc64-dq.s and ppc64-error-missaligned-dq.s fail on several of the build-bots.
Reverting to investigate.
llvm-svn: 340568
Fixes the handling of *_DS relocations used on DQ-form instructions where we
were overwriting some of the extended opcode bits. Also adds an alignment check
so that the user will receive a diagnostic error if the value we are writing
is not properly aligned.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51124
llvm-svn: 340564
This is a minor follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D49189. On Windows, lld
used to print "lld-link.exe: error: ...". Now it just prints "lld-link: error:
...". This matches what link.exe does (it prints "LINK : ...") and makes lld's
output less dependent on the host system.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51133
llvm-svn: 340487
We have an issue with -wrap that the option doesn't work well when
renamed symbols get PLT entries. I'll explain what is the issue and
how this patch solves it.
For one -wrap option, we have three symbols: foo, wrap_foo and real_foo.
Currently, we use memcpy to overwrite wrapped symbols so that they get
the same contents. This works in most cases but doesn't when the relocation
processor sets some flags in the symbol. memcpy'ed symbols are just
aliases, so they always have to have the same contents, but the
relocation processor breaks that assumption.
r336609 is an attempt to fix the issue by memcpy'ing again after
processing relocations, so that symbols that are out of sync get the
same contents again. That works in most cases as well, but it breaks
ASan build in a mysterious way.
We could probably fix the issue by choosing symbol attributes that need
to be copied after they are updated. But it feels too complicated to me.
So, in this patch, I fixed it once and for all. With this patch, we no
longer memcpy symbols. All references to renamed symbols point to new
symbols after wrapSymbols() is done.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50569
llvm-svn: 340387
Summary:
For -thinlto-object-suffix-replace=old\;new, in
tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp, the thinlto object filename is Path minus
optional old suffix.
static std::string getThinLTOObjectFileName(StringRef Path, StringRef OldSuffix,
StringRef NewSuffix) {
if (OldSuffix.empty() && NewSuffix.empty())
return Path;
StringRef NewPath = Path;
NewPath.consume_back(OldSuffix);
std::string NewNewPath = NewPath;
NewNewPath += NewSuffix;
return NewNewPath;
}
Currently lld will error that the path does not end with old suffix.
This patch makes lld accept such paths but only add new suffix if Path
ends with old suffix. This fixes a link error where bitcode members in
an archive are regular LTO objects without old suffix.
Acording to tejohnson, this will "enable supporting mix and match of
minimized ThinLTO bitcode files with normal ThinLTO bitcode files in a
single link (where we want to apply the suffix replacement to the
minimized files, and just ignore it for the normal ThinLTO files)."
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc, tejohnson, espindola
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: emaste, inglorion, arichardson, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51055
llvm-svn: 340364
This patch adds the target call back relaxTlsIeToLe to support TLS relaxation
from initial exec to local exec model.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48091
llvm-svn: 340281
Our code in LazyObjFile::parse() has an ELFT switch and
adds a lazy object by its ELFT kind.
Though it might be possible to add a file using a different
architecture and make LLD to silently accept it (if the file
is empty or contains only week symbols). That itself, not a
huge issue perhaps (because the error would be reported later
if the file is fetched), but still does not look clean and correct.
It is possible to report an error earlier and clean up the
code. That is what the patch does.
Ideally, we might want to reuse isCompatible from SymbolTable.cpp,
but it is static and accepts a file as an argument, what is not
convenient. Since such a situation should be rare, I think it
should be OK to go with the way chosen in this patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50899
llvm-svn: 340257
This fixes the following warning when compiling with gcc version 8.0.1 20180319 (experimental) (GCC):
/home/umb/LLVM/llvm/tools/lld/ELF/SyntheticSections.cpp:1951:46: warning: enumeral and non-enumeral type in conditional expression [-Wextra]
return OS->SectionIndex >= SHN_LORESERVE ? SHN_XINDEX : OS->SectionIndex;
llvm-svn: 340164
Older Arm architectures do not support the MOVT and MOVW instructions so we
must use an alternative sequence of instructions to transfer control to the
destination.
Assuming at least Armv5 this patch adds support for Thunks that load or add
to the program counter. Note that there are no Armv5 Thumb Thunks as there
is no Thumb branch instruction in Armv5 that supports Thunks. These thunks
will not work for Armv4t (arm7tdmi) as this architecture cannot change state
from using the LDR or ADD instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50077
llvm-svn: 340160
The Thumb BL and BLX instructions on older Arm Architectures such as v5 and
v6 have a constrained encoding J1 and J2 must equal 1, later Architectures
relaxed this restriction allowing J1 and J2 to be used to calculate a larger
immediate.
This patch adds support for the old encoding, it is used when the build
attributes for the input objects only contain older architectures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50076
llvm-svn: 340159
Summary: This makes it conform to what the comment says. Otherwise when getErrPlace() is called afterwards, cast<InputSection>(D) will cause incompatible cast as MergeInputSection is not a subclass of InputSection.
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, espindola, pcc
Reviewed By: grimar
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50742
llvm-svn: 339904
This patch solves 2 problems:
1) It adds a test to check the line below:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/lld/blob/master/ELF/InputFiles.cpp#L334
Test case contains SHT_GROUP section with a broken (0xFF) flag.
2) The patch fixes the case when we silently accepted such broken groups
in the case when there were no other objects with the same group signature.
llvm-svn: 339765
We have a dead piece of code there which is impossible to trigger
using regular objects I believe.
Patch removes it and adds a test case showing how this condition
can be triggered with use of a broken object and crash the linker.
llvm-svn: 339680
The code involved was simply dead. `IgnoreAll` value is used in
`maybeReportUndefined` only which is never called for -r.
And at the same time `IgnoreAll` was set only for -r.
llvm-svn: 339672
That piece of code is really very old and "protected"
from TLS relocations against symbol in non-allocatable sections.
It is useless because normally non-alloc sections have relocations
with allocatable targets, but not the reverse.
And so the code was simply dead.
llvm-svn: 339553
It turns out that postThunkContents() is only used for
sorting symbols in .symtab.
Though we can instead move the logic to SymbolTableBaseSection::finalizeContents(),
postpone calling it and then get rid of postThunkContents completely.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49547
llvm-svn: 339413
We have a crash issue when handling the empty -defsym.
For parsing this option we are using ScriptParser class which is used
generally for reading the linker script. For empty defsym case, we
pass the empty memory buffer and crash in the place removed in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL336436.
But reverting of the above patch would not help here (we would still crash but a bit later). And
even after fixing the crash we would report something like
"lld.exe: error: -defsym:1: unexpected EOF"
It is probably not the appropriate message because mentions EOF.
I think the issue should be handled on a higher level like this patch does.
So we do not want to pass the empty memory buffer first of all I believe.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50498
llvm-svn: 339412
Patch by PkmX.
This patch makes lld recognize RISC-V target and implements basic
relocation for RV32/RV64 (and RVC). This should be necessary for static
linking ELF applications.
The ABI documentation for RISC-V can be found at:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md.
Note that the documentation is far from complete so we had to figure out
some details from bfd.
The patch should be pretty straightforward. Some highlights:
- A new relocation Expr R_RISCV_PC_INDIRECT is added. This is needed as
the low part of a PC-relative relocation is linked to the corresponding
high part (auipc), see:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md#pc-relative-symbol-addresses
- LLVM's MC support for RISC-V is very incomplete (we are working on
this), so tests are given in objectyaml format with the original
assembly included in the comments. Once we have complete support for
RISC-V in MC, we can switch to llvm-as/llvm-objdump.
- We don't support linker relaxation for now as it requires greater
changes to lld that is beyond the scope of this patch. Once this is
accepted we can start to work on adding relaxation to lld.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39322
llvm-svn: 339364
This is a larger patch. This relocation has irregular immediate
masks that require a lookup to find the correct mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50450
llvm-svn: 339332
Adding all libcall symbols to the link can have undesired consequences.
For example, the libgcc implementation of __sync_val_compare_and_swap_8
on 32-bit ARM pulls in an .init_array entry that aborts the program if
the Linux kernel does not support 64-bit atomics, which would prevent
the program from running even if it does not use 64-bit atomics.
This change makes it so that we only add libcall symbols to the
link before LTO if we have to, i.e. if the symbol's definition is in
bitcode. Any other required libcall symbols will be added to the link
after LTO when we add the LTO object file to the link.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50475
llvm-svn: 339301
Summary: To be consistent with other files where only SignExtend64 is used.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50366
llvm-svn: 339083
GNU ld's manual says that TARGET(foo) is basically an alias for
`--format foo` where foo is a BFD target name such as elf64-x86-64.
Unlike GNU linkers, lld doesn't allow arbitrary BFD target name for
--format. We accept only "default", "elf" or "binary". This makes
situation a bit tricky because we can't simply make TARGET an alias for
--target.
A quick code search revealed that the usage number of TARGET is very
small, and the only meaningful usage is to switch to the binary mode.
Thus, in this patch, we handle only TARGET(elf.*) and TARGET(binary).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48153
llvm-svn: 339060
During copy relocation of a variable defined in a DSO, if a TLS variable in that DSO happens to have the same st_value, it would also be copied. This was unnecessary because the addresses of TLS variables are relative to TLS segment. They don't interfere with non-TLS variables.
This copying behavior can be harmful in the following scenario:
For function-scope thread-local variables with non-trivial constructors,
they have guard variables. In the case of x86_64 general-dynamic model:
template <int N>
void foo() {
thread_local std::string a;
}
GOT[n] R_X86_64_DTPMOD64 guard variable for a
GOT[n+1] R_X86_64_DTPOFF64 guard variable for a
GOT[n+2] R_X86_64_DTPMOD64 a
GOT[n+3] R_X86_64_DTPOFF64 a
a and its guard variable are both represented as TLS variables, which
should be within the same module. If one is copy relocated to the main
module while the other is not, their module ID will mismatch and can
cause access without prior construction.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50289
llvm-svn: 339042
Some parts of the code changed are a bit old. I found traces in 2016.
Initiall commits has test cases and perhaps reasonable comments.
For example, we had segfaults earlier and had the code to fix them.
Now, in 2018, I think it is excessive to have these parts, because
we do not have segfaults and our code was changed a lot (softly saying).
I reviewed the current sources and I think that at this point of the
execution flow, we should never face with
the conditions checked and so I removing them in this patch.
This helps to cleanup the code.
llvm-svn: 339003
This simplifies the code a bit.
It is NFC except that it removes early exit for Count == 0
which does not seem to be useful (we have no such tests either).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49136
llvm-svn: 338953
Rui Ueyama