Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Krzysztof Parzyszek d91a9e27a9 [Hexagon] Simplify CFG after atomic expansion
This will remove suboptimal branching from the generated ll/sc loops.
The extra simplification pass affects a lot of testcases, which have
been modified to accommodate this change: either by modifying the
test to become immune to the CFG simplification, or (less preferablt)
by adding option -hexagon-initial-cfg-clenaup=0.

llvm-svn: 338774
2018-08-02 22:17:53 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 014c000f6a [DAG] make binops with undef operands consistent with IR
This started by noticing that scalar and vector types were producing different results with div ops in PR36305:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36305

...but the problem is bigger. I couldn't keep it straight without a table, so I'm attaching that as a PDF to 
the review. The x86 tests in undef-ops.ll correspond to that table.

Green means that instsimplify and the DAG agree on the result for all types.
Red means the DAG was returning undef when IR was not.
Yellow means the DAG was returning a non-undef result when IR returned undef.

This patch assumes that we're currently doing the right thing in IR.

Note: I couldn't find any problems with lowering vector constants as the code comments were warning, 
but those comments were written long ago in rL36413 .

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43141

llvm-svn: 324941
2018-02-12 21:37:27 +00:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek a72fad980c [Hexagon] Replace instruction definitions with auto-generated ones
llvm-svn: 294753
2017-02-10 15:33:13 +00:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek 4773f647bd [Tail duplication] Handle source registers with subregisters
When a block is tail-duplicated, the PHI nodes from that block are
replaced with appropriate COPY instructions. When those PHI nodes
contained use operands with subregisters, the subregisters were
dropped from the COPY instructions, resulting in incorrect code.

Keep track of the subregister information and use this information
when remapping instructions from the duplicated block.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19337

llvm-svn: 267583
2016-04-26 18:36:34 +00:00