Summary:
The hash computed for an ArrayType was different when first constructed
versus when later profiled due to the constructor default argument, and
we were not tracking constructor / destructor variant as part of the
mangled name AST, leading to incorrect equivalences.
Reviewers: erik.pilkington
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51463
llvm-svn: 342166
Summary:
The snippet-generation part goes to the SnippetGenerator class.
This will allow benchmarking arbitrary code (see PR38437).
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51979
llvm-svn: 342117
construction, a new convenience lookup method, and add-to layer methods.
ExecutionSession now creates a special 'main' JITDylib upon construction. All
subsequently created JITDylibs are added to the main JITDylib's search order by
default (controlled by the AddToMainDylibSearchOrder parameter to
ExecutionSession::createDylib). The main JITDylib's search order will be used in
the future to properly handle cross-JITDylib weak symbols, with the first
definition in this search order selected.
This commit also adds a new ExecutionSession::lookup convenience method that
performs a blocking lookup using the main JITDylib's search order, as this will
be a very common operation for clients.
Finally, new convenience overloads of IRLayer and ObjectLayer's add methods are
introduced that add the given program representations to the main dylib, which
is likely to be the common case.
llvm-svn: 342086
The previous implementation traversed all loop blocks and bailed if one
was not a latch block. Since we are only interested in latch blocks, we
should only traverse those.
llvm-svn: 341926
Summary:
This more correctly reflects the data written by the FDR mode runtime.
This is a continuation of the work in D50441.
Reviewers: mboerger, eizan
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51911
llvm-svn: 341905
Summary:
In this change, we implement a `BlockPrinter` which orders records in a
Block that's been indexed by the `BlockIndexer`. This is used in the
`llvm-xray fdr-dump` tool which ties together the various types and
utilities we've been working on, to allow for inspection of XRay FDR
mode traces both with and without verification.
This change is the final step of the refactoring of D50441.
Reviewers: mboerger, eizan
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51846
llvm-svn: 341887
Summary:
End goal is to update MemorySSA in all loop passes. LoopUnswitch clones all blocks in a loop. SimpleLoopUnswitch clones some blocks. LoopRotate clones some instructions.
Some of these loop passes also make CFG changes.
This is an API based on what I found needed in LoopUnswitch, SimpleLoopUnswitch, LoopRotate, LoopInstSimplify, LoopSimplifyCFG.
Adding dependent patches using this API for context.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv, dberlin
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45299
llvm-svn: 341855
Summary:
This patch implements a `BlockVerifier` type which enforces the
invariants of the log structure of FDR mode logs on a per-block basis.
This ensures that the data we encounter from an FDR mode log
semantically correct (i.e. that records follow the documented "grammar"
for FDR mode log records).
This is another part of the refactoring of D50441.
This is a slightly modified version of rL341628, avoiding the
`std::tuple<...>` constructor that is not constexpr in C++11.
Reviewers: mboerger, eizan
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51723
llvm-svn: 341769
Summary:
This patch implements a `BlockVerifier` type which enforces the
invariants of the log structure of FDR mode logs on a per-block basis.
This ensures that the data we encounter from an FDR mode log
semantically correct (i.e. that records follow the documented "grammar"
for FDR mode log records).
This is another part of the refactoring of D50441.
Reviewers: mboerger, eizan
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51723
llvm-svn: 341628
libLLVMTestingSupport.so references a symbol in utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp (a layering issue) and will cause a link error because of -Wl,-z,defs (cmake/modules/HandleLLVMOptions.cmake)
Waiting zturner for a better fix.
llvm-svn: 341580
The existing memory manager API can not be shared between objects when linking
concurrently (since there is no way to know which concurrent allocations were
performed on behalf of which object, and hence which allocations would be safe
to finalize when finalizeMemory is called). For now, we can work around this by
requiring a new memory manager for each object.
This change only affects the concurrent version of the ORC APIs.
llvm-svn: 341579
Summary:
This change adds a `BlockIndexer` type which maintains pointers to
records that belong to the same process+thread pairs. The indexing
happens with order of appearance of records as they are visited.
This version of the indexer currently only supports FDR version 3 logs,
which contain `BufferExtent` records. We will add support for v2 and v1
logs in follow-up patches.
This is another part of D50441.
Reviewers: eizan, kpw, mboerger
Reviewed By: mboerger
Subscribers: mboerger, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51673
llvm-svn: 341518
The way DIA SDK works is that when you request a symbol, it
gets assigned an internal identifier that is unique for the
life of the session. You can then use this identifier to
get back the same symbol, with all of the same internal state
that it had before, even if you "destroyed" the original
copy of the object you had.
This didn't work properly in our native implementation, and
if you destroyed an object for a particular symbol, then
requested the same symbol again, it would get assigned a new
ID and you'd get a fresh copy of the object. In order to fix
this some refactoring had to happen to properly reuse cached
objects. Some unittests are added to verify that symbol
reuse is taking place, making use of the new unittest input
feature.
llvm-svn: 341503
Occasionally it is useful to have unittest which take inputs.
While we normally try to have this test be more of a lit test
we occasionally don't have tools that can exercise the code
in the right way to test certain things. LLDB has been using
this style of unit test for a while, particularly with regards
to how it tests core dump and minidump file parsing. Recently
i needed this as well for the case where we want to test that
some of the PDB reading code works correctly. It needs to
exercise the code in a way that is not covered by any dumper
and would be impractical to implement in one of the dumpers,
but requires a valid PDB file. Since this is now needed by
more than one project, it makes sense to have this be a
generally supported thing that unit tests can do, and we just
encourage people to use this sparingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51561
llvm-svn: 341502
We do this instead of using static constexpr char arrays because MSVC
2015 cannot handle the constant initialisation of those along with the
out-of-line storage declaration.
This is a follow-up to D51672.
llvm-svn: 341479
Summary:
This change adds a `RecordPrinter` type which does some basic text
serialization of the FDR record instances. This is one component of the
tool we're building to dump the records from an FDR mode log as-is.
This is a small part of D50441.
Reviewers: eizan, kpw
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51672
llvm-svn: 341447
Summary:
Original changeset (https://reviews.llvm.org/D46776) by @modocache. It was
reverted after the PS4 bot failed.
The issue has been determined to be with the way the PS4 SDK handles this
particular option. https://reviews.llvm.org/D50410 removes this test, so we
can push this again.
Patch by Arnaud Coomans!
Reviewers: cfe-commits, modocache
Reviewed By: modocache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50515
llvm-svn: 341329
Also adjust some of dsymutil's headers to put the header guards at the top,
otherwise the compiler will not recognize them as header guards.
llvm-svn: 341323
Removes the implicit conversion to the underlying type for
JITSymbolFlags::FlagNames and replaces it with some bitwise and comparison
operators.
llvm-svn: 341282
Previously we've been reading and writing the wrong types which only
worked in little endian implementations. This time we're writing the
same typed values the runtime is using, and reading them appropriately
as well.
llvm-svn: 341241
I changed the seed slightly, but forgot to run the tests on a 32-bit system, so
tests which hard-code a specific hash value started breaking.
llvm-svn: 341240
Before this patch, the FDRTraceWriter would not take endianness into
account when writing data into the output stream.
This is a follow-up to D51289 and D51210.
llvm-svn: 341223
/build/llvm/unittests/XRay/FDRProducerConsumerTest.cpp:90:27: error: declaration of ‘std::unique_ptr<llvm::xray::Record> llvm::xray::{anonymous}::RoundTripTest<T>::Record’ [-fpermissive]
std::unique_ptr<Record> Record;
^~~~~~
In file included from /build/llvm/include/llvm/XRay/FDRLogBuilder.h:12,
from /build/llvm/unittests/XRay/FDRProducerConsumerTest.cpp:15:
/build/llvm/include/llvm/XRay/FDRRecords.h:28:7: error: changes meaning of ‘Record’ from ‘class llvm::xray::Record’ [-fpermissive]
class Record {
^~~~~~
llvm-svn: 341189
Summary:
This patch defines two new base types called `RecordProducer` and
`RecordConsumer` which have default implementations for convenience
(particularly for testing).
A `RecordProducer` implementation has one member function called
`produce()` which serves as a factory constructor for `Record`
instances. This code exercises the `RecordInitializer` code path in the
implementation for `FileBasedRecordProducer`.
A `RecordConsumer` has a single member function called `consume(...)`
which, as the name implies, consumes instances of
`std::unique_ptr<Record>`. We have two implementations, one of which is
used in the test to generate a vector of `std::unique_ptr<Record>`
similar to how the `LogBuilder` implementation works.
We introduce a test in `FDRProducerConsumerTest` which ensures that
records we write through the `FDRTraceWriter` can be loaded by the
`FileBasedRecordProducer`. The record(s) loaded this way are written
again through the `FDRTraceWriter` into a separate string, which we then
compare. This ensures that the read-in bytes to create the `Record`
instances in memory can be replicated when written out through the
`FDRTraceWriter`.
This change depends on D51210 and is part of the refactoring of D50441
into smaller, more focused changes.
Reviewers: eizan, kpw
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51289
llvm-svn: 341180
management and materialization responsibility registration.
The setOverrideObjectFlagsWithResponsibilityFlags method instructs
RTDyldObjectlinkingLayer2 to override the symbol flags produced by RuntimeDyld with
the flags provided by the MaterializationResponsibility instance. This can be used
to enable symbol visibility (hidden/exported) for COFF object files, which do not
currently support the SF_Exported flag.
The setAutoClaimResponsibilityForObjectSymbols method instructs
RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer2 to claim responsibility for any symbols provided by a
given object file that were not already in the MaterializationResponsibility
instance. Setting this flag allows higher-level program representations (e.g.
LLVM IR) to be added based on only a subset of the symbols they provide, without
having to write intervening layers to scan and add the additional symbols. This
trades diagnostic quality for convenience however: If all symbols are enumerated
up-front then clashes can be detected and reported early. If this option is set,
clashes for the additional symbols may not be detected until late, and detection
may depend on the flow of control through JIT'd code.
llvm-svn: 341154
This was one of the potential follow-ups suggested in D48236,
and these will be used to make matching the patterns in PR38691 cleaner:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38691
About the vocabulary: in the DAG, these would be concat_vector with an
undef operand or extract_subvector. Alternate names are discussed in the
review, but I think these are familiar/good enough to proceed. Once we
have uses of them in code, we might adjust if there are better options.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51392
llvm-svn: 341075
Richard Diamond