with its source instead of forcing the values on GPRs.
This improves the lowering of vector code when such bitcasts happen in the
middle of vector computations.
rdar://problem/23691584
llvm-svn: 254684
The ARM ARM is clear that 128-bit loads are only guaranteed to have been atomic
if there has been a corresponding successful stxp. It's less clear for AArch32, so
I'm leaving that alone for now.
llvm-svn: 254524
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
Building on r253865 the crash is not limited to signed overflows.
Disable custom handling of unsigned 32-bit and 64-bit integer divide.
Add test cases for both 32-bit and 64-bit unsigned integer overflow.
llvm-svn: 254158
Summary:
Many target lowerings copy-paste the code to test SDValues for known constants.
This code can instead be shared in SelectionDAG.cpp, and reused in the targets.
Reviewers: MatzeB, andreadb, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14945
llvm-svn: 254085
Disable custom handling of signed 32-bit and 64-bit integer divide.
Add test cases for both 32-bit and 64-bit integer overflow crashes.
llvm-svn: 253865
This was left implicit and never ever checked, which means we could have a CMPZ against some non-zero value and we were carrying on with BFI conversion regardless.
Caught by Oliver Stannard using csmith; regression test added.
llvm-svn: 253195
I completely misunderstood what ARMISD::CMPZ means. It's not "compare equal to zero", it's "compare, only setting the zero/Z flag". It can either be equal-to-zero or not-equal-to-zero, and we weren't checking what sense it was.
If it's equal-to-zero, we can swap the operands around and pretend like it is not-equal-to-zero, which is both a bug fix and lets us handle more cases.
llvm-svn: 252891
I missed the side-effects of ParseBFI in my previous attempt (r252748).
Thanks dblaikie for the suggestion of adding a void use of the unused
variable instead.
llvm-svn: 252751
If we have a chain of BFIs, we may be able to combine several together into one merged BFI. We can do this if the "from" bits from one BFI OR'd with the "from" bits from the other BFI form a contiguous range, and the same with the "to" bits.
llvm-svn: 252740
ARM V6T2 has instructions for efficient count-leading/trailing-zeros, so this should be
considered a cheap operation (and therefore fair game for speculation) for any ARM V6T2
implementation.
The net result of allowing this speculation for the regression tests in this patch is
that we get this code:
ctlz:
clz r0, r0
bx lr
cttz:
rbit r0, r0
clz r0, r0
bx lr
Instead of:
ctlz:
cmp r0, #0
moveq r0, #32
clzne r0, r0
bx lr
cttz:
cmp r0, #0
moveq r0, #32
rbitne r0, r0
clzne r0, r0
bx lr
This will help solve a general speculation/despeculation problem noted in PR24818:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24818
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14469
llvm-svn: 252639
Added fixes for stage2 failures: CMOV is not commutable; commuting the operands results in the condition being flipped! d'oh!
Original commit message:
If we have a CMOV, OR and AND combination such as:
if (x & CN)
y |= CM;
And:
* CN is a single bit;
* All bits covered by CM are known zero in y;
Then we can convert this to a sequence of BFI instructions. This will always be a win if CM is a single bit, will always be no worse than the TST & OR sequence if CM is two bits, and for thumb will be no worse if CM is three bits (due to the extra IT instruction).
llvm-svn: 252606
"GCC requires the freestanding environment provide memcpy, memmove, memset
and memcmp": https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.2.0/gcc/Standards.html
Hence in GNUEABI targets LLVM should not convert 'memops' to their equivalent
'__aeabi_memops'. This convertion violates GCC contract.
The -meabi flag controls whether or not LLVM will modify 'memops' in GNUEABI
targets.
Without -meabi: use the triple default EABI.
With -meabi=default: use the triple default EABI.
With -meabi=gnu: use 'memops'.
With -meabi=4 or -meabi=5: use '__aeabi_memops'.
With -meabi set to an unknown value: same as -meabi=default.
Patch by Vinicius Tinti.
llvm-svn: 252462
Summary:
The CLR's personality routine passes these in rdx/edx, not rax/eax.
Make getExceptionPointerRegister a virtual method parameterized by
personality function to allow making this distinction.
Similarly make getExceptionSelectorRegister a virtual method parameterized
by personality function, for symmetry.
Reviewers: pgavlin, majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14344
llvm-svn: 252383
We can conservatively know that CMOV's known bits are the intersection of known bits for each of its operands. This helps PerformCMOVToBFICombine find more opportunities.
I tried hard to create a testcase for this and failed - we have to sufficiently confuse DAG.computeKnownBits which can see through all the cheap tricks I tried to narrow my larger testcase down :(
This code is actually exercised in CodeGen/ARM/bfi.ll, there's just no functional difference because DAG.computeKnownBits gets the right answer in that case.
llvm-svn: 252168
If we have a CMOV, OR and AND combination such as:
if (x & CN)
y |= CM;
And:
* CN is a single bit;
* All bits covered by CM are known zero in y;
Then we can convert this to a sequence of BFI instructions. This will always be a win if CM is a single bit, will always be no worse than the TST & OR sequence if CM is two bits, and for thumb will be no worse if CM is three bits (due to the extra IT instruction).
llvm-svn: 252057
Summary: After D13851 landed, we saw backend crashes when compiling the reduced test case included in this patch. The right fix seems to be to allow these vector types for expansion in instruction selection.
Reviewers: rengolin, t.p.northover
Subscribers: RKSimon, t.p.northover, aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14082
llvm-svn: 251401
In PIC mode we were previously computing global variable addresses (or GOT
entry addresses) by adding the PC, the PC-relative GOT displacement and
the GOT-relative symbol/GOT entry displacement. Because the latter two
displacements are fixed, we ended up performing one more addition than
necessary.
This change causes us to compute addresses using a single PC-relative
displacement, resulting in a shorter code sequence. This reduces code size
by about 4% in a recent build of Chromium for Android.
As a result of this change we no longer need to compute the GOT base address
in the ARM backend, which allows us to remove the Global Base Reg pass and
SDAG lowering for the GOT.
We also now no longer use the GOT when addressing a symbol which is known
to be defined in the same linkage unit. Specifically, the symbol must have
either hidden visibility or a strong definition in the current module in
order to not use the the GOT.
This is a change from the previous behaviour where we would use the GOT to
address externally visible symbols defined in the same module. I think the
only cases where this could matter are cases involving symbol interposition,
but we don't really support that well anyway.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13650
llvm-svn: 251322
Summary:
TargetLoweringBase::Expand is defined as "Try to expand this to other ops,
otherwise use a libcall." For ISD::UDIV and ISD::SDIV, the choice between
the two possibilities was defined in a rather convoluted way:
- if DIVREM is legal, expand to DIVREM
- if DIVREM has a custom lowering, expand to DIVREM
- if DIVREM libcall is defined and a remainder from the same division is
computed elsewhere, expand to a DIVREM libcall
- else, expand to a DIV libcall
This had the undesirable effect that if both DIV and DIVREM are implemented
as libcalls, then ISD::UDIV and ISD::SDIV are expanded to the heavier DIVREM
libcall, even when the remainder isn't used.
The new code adds a new LegalizeAction, TargetLoweringBase::LibCall, so that
backends can directly control whether they prefer an expansion or a conversion
to a libcall. This makes the generic lowering code even more generic,
allowing its reuse in a wider range of target-specific configurations.
The useful effect is that ARM backend will now generate a call
to __aeabi_{i,u}div rather than __aeabi_{i,u}divmod in cases where
it doesn't need the remainder. There's no functional change outside
the ARM backend.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, rengolin
Subscribers: t.p.northover, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13862
llvm-svn: 250826
I'll be using the function in a similar combine for AArch64. The helper was
also improved to handle undef values.
Part of http://reviews.llvm.org/D13442
llvm-svn: 249572
The ARM RTABI defines the half- to single-precision float conversion functions
with an __aeabi prefix, but libgcc only has them with a __gnu prefix. Therefore
we need to emit the __aeabi version when compiling with an eabi or eabihf
triple, and the __gnu version with a gnueabi or gnueabihf triple.
llvm-svn: 249565
Without an additional check for NEON, the compiler crashes during
legalization of NEON ldN/stN.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13508
llvm-svn: 249550
We were previously codegen'ing memcpy as regular load/store operations and
hoping that the register allocator would allocate registers in ascending order
so that we could apply an LDM/STM combine after register allocation. According
to the commit that first introduced this code (r37179), we planned to teach the
register allocator to allocate the registers in ascending order. This never got
implemented, and up to now we've been stuck with very poor codegen.
A much simpler approach for achieving better codegen is to create MEMCPY pseudo
instructions, attach scratch virtual registers to them and then, post register
allocation, expand the MEMCPYs into LDM/STM pairs using the scratch registers.
The register allocator will have picked arbitrary registers which we sort when
expanding the MEMCPY. This approach also avoids the need to repeatedly calculate
offsets which ultimately ought to be eliminated pre-RA in order to decrease
register pressure.
Fixes PR9199 and PR23768.
[This is based on Peter Collingbourne's r238473 which was reverted.]
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13239
Change-Id: I727543c2e94136e0f80b8e22d5642d7b9ee5b458
Author: Peter Collingbourne <peter@pcc.me.uk>
llvm-svn: 249322
This commit changes the interface of the vld[1234], vld[234]lane, and vst[1234],
vst[234]lane ARM neon intrinsics and associates an address space with the
pointer that these intrinsics take. This changes, e.g.,
<2 x i32> @llvm.arm.neon.vld1.v2i32(i8*, i32)
to
<2 x i32> @llvm.arm.neon.vld1.v2i32.p0i8(i8*, i32)
This change ensures that address spaces are fully taken into account in the ARM
target during lowering of interleaved loads and stores.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12985
llvm-svn: 248887
supportsTailCall() has two callers. Both of them double-check isThumb1Only(),
and refuse to proceed with tail-calling in that case.
Therefore, it makes sense to move this check to
ARMSubtarget::initSubtargetFeatures, where SupportsTailCall is initialized;
and to eliminate the extra checks at the call sites.
Following a review comment, added an "assert(supportsTailCall())"
in IsEligibleForTailCall.
NFC.
llvm-svn: 248703
We now emit the compiler generated divide by zero check that was needed for the
MSVC routines. We construct a psuedo-instruction for the DBZ check as the
operation requires splitting up the BB. For the 64-bit operations, we need to
custom expand the node as we need to insert the DBZ check and then emit the
libcall to the appropriate name. Because this is target specific, it seemed
better to reproduce the expansion operation from the target-agnostic type
legalization rather than sink this there to avoid the duplication. The division
library calls now match MSVC semantically.
llvm-svn: 248561
Currently, the availability of DSP instructions (ACLE 6.4.7) is handled in a
hand-rolled tricky condition block in tools/clang/lib/Basic/Targets.cpp, with
a FIXME: attached.
This patch changes the handling of +t2dsp to be in line with other
architecture extensions.
Following a revert of r248152 and new review comments, this patch also includes
renaming FeatureDSPThumb2 -> FeatureDSP, hasThumb2DSP() -> hasDSP(), etc.
The spelling of "t2dsp" is preserved, pending a further investigation of its
possible external usage.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12937
llvm-svn: 248519
ARM counterpart to r248291:
In the comparison failure block of a cmpxchg expansion, the initial
ldrex/ldxr will not be followed by a matching strex/stxr.
On ARM/AArch64, this unnecessarily ties up the execution monitor,
which might have a negative performance impact on some uarchs.
Instead, release the monitor in the failure block.
The clrex instruction was designed for this: use it.
Also see ARMARM v8-A B2.10.2:
"Exclusive access instructions and Shareable memory locations".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13033
llvm-svn: 248294
The vext pseudo-instruction takes the number of elements that need to be
extracted, not the number of bytes. Hence, use the number of elements
directly instead of scaling them with a factor.
Reviewers: Silviu Baranga, James Molloy
(not reflected in the differential revision)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12974
llvm-svn: 248208
After D10403, we had FMF in the DAG but disabled by default. Nick reported no crashing errors after some stress testing,
so I enabled them at r243687. However, Escha soon notified us of a bug not covered by any in-tree regression tests:
if we don't propagate the flags, we may fail to CSE DAG nodes because differing FMF causes them to not match. There is
one test case in this patch to prove that point.
This patch hopes to fix or leave a 'TODO' for all of the in-tree places where we create nodes that are FMF-capable. I
did this by putting an assert in SelectionDAG.getNode() to find any FMF-capable node that was being created without FMF
( D11807 ). I then ran all regression tests and test-suite and confirmed that everything passes.
This patch exposes remaining work to get DAG FMF to be fully functional: (1) add the flags to non-binary nodes such as
FCMP, FMA and FNEG; (2) add the flags to intrinsics; (3) use the flags as conditions for transforms rather than the
current global settings.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12095
llvm-svn: 247815
Quentin Colombet