This commit adds a new target-independent calling convention for C++ TLS
access functions. It aims to minimize overhead in the caller by perserving as
many registers as possible.
The target-specific implementation for X86-64 is defined as following:
Arguments are passed as for the default C calling convention
The same applies for the return value(s)
The callee preserves all GPRs - except RAX and RDI
The access function makes C-style TLS function calls in the entry and exit
block, C-style TLS functions save a lot more registers than normal calls.
The added calling convention ties into the existing implementation of the
C-style TLS functions, so we can't simply use existing calling conventions
such as preserve_mostcc.
rdar://9001553
llvm-svn: 254737
Add new x86 pass which replaces address calculations in load or store instructions with def register of existing LEA (must be in the same basic block), if the LEA calculates address that differs only by a displacement. Works only with -Os or -Oz.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13294
llvm-svn: 254712
Summary:
computeRegisterLiveness and analyzePhysReg are currently getting
confused about liveness in some cases, breaking copyPhysReg's
calculation of whether AX is dead in some cases. Work around this issue
temporarily by assuming that AX is always live.
See detail in: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25033#c7
And associated bugs PR24535 PR25033 PR24991 PR24992 PR25201.
This workaround makes the code correct but slightly inefficient, but it
seems to confuse the machine instr verifier which now things EAX was
undefined in some cases where it's being conservatively saved /
restored.
Reviewers: majnemer, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15198
llvm-svn: 254680
Almost all these changes are conditioned and only apply to the new
x86-64 f128 type configuration, which will be enabled in a follow up
patch. They are required together to make new f128 work. If there is
any error, we should fix or revert them as a whole.
These changes should have no impact to current configurations.
* Relax type legalization checks to accept new f128 type configuration,
whose TypeAction is TypeSoftenFloat, not TypeLegal, but also has
TLI.isTypeLegal true.
* Relax GetSoftenedFloat to return in some cases f128 type SDValue,
which is TLI.isTypeLegal but not "softened" to i128 node.
* Allow customized FABS, FNEG, FCOPYSIGN on new f128 type configuration,
to generate optimized bitwise operators for libm functions.
* Enhance related Lower* functions to handle f128 type.
* Enhance DAGTypeLegalizer::run, SoftenFloatResult, and related functions
to keep new f128 type in register, and convert f128 operators to library calls.
* Fix Combiner, Emitter, Legalizer routines that did not handle f128 type.
* Add ExpandConstant to handle i128 constants, ExpandNode
to handle ISD::Constant node.
* Add one more parameter to getCommonSubClass and firstCommonClass,
to guarantee that returned common sub class will contain the specified
simple value type.
This extra parameter is used by EmitCopyFromReg in InstrEmitter.cpp.
* Fix infinite loop in getTypeLegalizationCost when f128 is the value type.
* Fix printOperand to handle null operand.
* Enhance ISD::BITCAST node to handle f128 constant.
* Expand new f128 type for BR_CC, SELECT_CC, SELECT, SETCC nodes.
* Enhance X86AsmPrinter to emit f128 values in comments.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15134
llvm-svn: 254653
Summary:
These ADJCALLSTACK markers don't generate code, but they keep dynamic
alloca code that calls chkstk out of the prologue.
This slightly pessimizes inalloca calls by preventing some register copy
coalescing, but I can live with that.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: hans, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15200
llvm-svn: 254645
Currently "<type> ptr <reg name>" treated as <reg name> in MS inline asm, ignoring the "<type> ptr" completely and possibly ignoring the intention of the user.
Fixed llvm to produce an error when encountering "<type> ptr <reg name>" operands.
For example: andpd xmm1,xmmword ptr xmm1 --> andpd xmm1, xmm1
though andpd has 2 possible matching formats - andpd xmm, xmm/m128
Patch by: ziv.izhar@intel.com
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14607
llvm-svn: 254607
|9B DD /7| FSTSW m2byte| Valid Valid Store FPU status word at m2byteafter checking for pending unmasked floating-point exceptions.|
|9B DF E0| FSTSW AX| Valid Valid Store FPU status word in AX register after checking for pending unmasked floating-point exceptions.|
|DD /7 |FNSTSW *m2byte| Valid Valid Store FPU status word at m2bytewithout checking for pending unmasked floating-point exceptions.|
|DF E0 |FNSTSW *AX| Valid Valid Store FPU status word in AX register without checking for pending unmasked floating-point exceptions|
m2byte is word register, and therefor instruction operand need to be change from f32mem to i16mem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14953
llvm-svn: 254512
On FMA targets, we can avoid having to load a constant to negate a float/double multiply by instead using a FNMSUB (-(X*Y)-0)
Fix for PR24366
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14909
llvm-svn: 254495
I checked and updated the cost of AVX-512 conversion operations. Added cost of conversion operations in DQ mode.
Conversion of illegal types that requires vector split is not calculated right now (like for other X86 targets).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15074
llvm-svn: 254494
Not sure how to test this. I noticed by inspection in the isel tables where the same pattern tried to produce DIV and DIVR or SUB and SUBR.
llvm-svn: 254388
We currently output FMA instructions on targets which support both FMA4 + FMA (i.e. later Bulldozer CPUS bdver2/bdver3/bdver4).
This patch flips this so FMA4 is preferred; this is for several reasons:
1 - FMA4 is non-destructive reducing the need for mov instructions.
2 - Its more straighforward to commute and fold inputs (although the recent work on FMA has reduced this difference).
3 - All supported targets have FMA4 performance equal or better to FMA - Piledriver (bdver2) in particular has half the throughput when executing FMA instructions.
Its looks like no future AMD processor lines will support FMA4 after the Bulldozer series so we're not causing problems for later CPUs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14997
llvm-svn: 254339
The MachineVerifier wants to check that the register operands of an
instruction belong to the instruction's register class. RIP-relative
control flow instructions violated this by referencing RIP. While this
was fixed for SysV, it was never fixed for Win64.
llvm-svn: 254315
We could already recognise shuffle(FSUB, FADD) -> ADDSUB, this allow us to recognise shuffle(FADD, FSUB) -> ADDSUB by commuting the shuffle mask prior to matching.
llvm-svn: 254259
generated for _mm_losd_s{s,d}() intrinsics and used in scalar FMAs generated
for FMA intrinsics _mm_f{madd,msub,nmadd,nmsub}_s{s,d}().
Reviewer: David Kreitzer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14762
llvm-svn: 254140
Summary:
Many target lowerings copy-paste the code to test SDValues for known constants.
This code can instead be shared in SelectionDAG.cpp, and reused in the targets.
Reviewers: MatzeB, andreadb, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14945
llvm-svn: 254085
It was wrong order of operands (from intrinsic to DAG node).
I added more strict type specification for instruction selection.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14942
llvm-svn: 254059
This caused PR25607 and also caused Chromium to crash on start-up.
(Also had to update test/CodeGen/X86/avx-splat.ll, which was committed
after shrink wrapping was enabled.)
llvm-svn: 254044
X86 needs to use its own FMA opcodes, preventing the standard FNEG(FMA) pattern table recognition method used by other platforms. This patch adds support for lowering FNEG(FMA(X,Y,Z)) into a single suitably negated FMA instruction.
Fix for PR24364
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14906
llvm-svn: 254016
This patch fixes the following issues:
1. Fix the return type of X86psadbw: it should not be the same type of inputs.
For vNi8 inputs the output should be vMi64, where M = N/8.
2. Fix the return type of int_x86_avx512_psad_bw_512 accordingly.
3. Fix the definiton of PSADBW, VPSADBW, and VPSADBWY accordingly.
4. Adjust the return type when building a DAG node of X86ISD::PSADBW type.
5. Update related tests.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14897
llvm-svn: 254010
Sanjay Patel