This change is simply enhancing the existing inference algorithm to handle insertelement instructions by conservatively inserting a new instruction to propagate the vector of associated base pointers. In the process, I'm ripping out the peephole optimizations which mostly helped cover the fact this hadn't been done.
Note that most of the newly inserted nodes will be nearly immediately removed by the post insertion optimization pass introduced in 246718. Arguably, we should be trying harder to avoid the malloc traffic here, but I'd rather get the code correct, then worry about compile time.
Unlike previous extensions of the algorithm to handle more case, I discovered the existing code was causing miscompiles in some cases. In particular, we had an implicit assumption that the peephole covered *all* insert element instructions, so if we had a value directly based on a insert element the peephole didn't cover, we proceeded as if it were a base anyways. Not good. I believe we had the same issue with shufflevector which is why I adjusted the predicate for them as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12583
llvm-svn: 247210
Previously, the base pointer algorithm wasn't deterministic. The core fixed point was (of course), but we were inserting new nodes and optimizing them in an order which was unspecified and variable. We'd somewhat hacked around this for testing by sorting by value name, but that doesn't solve the general determinism problem.
Instead, we can use the order of traversal over the def/use graph to give us a single consistent ordering. Today, this is a DFS order, but the exact order doesn't mater provided it's deterministic for a given input.
(Q: It is safe to rely on a deterministic order of operands right?)
Note that this only fixes the determinism within a single inference step. The inference step is currently invoked many times in a non-deterministic order. That's a future change in the sequence. :)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12640
llvm-svn: 247208
with the new pass manager, and no longer relying on analysis groups.
This builds essentially a ground-up new AA infrastructure stack for
LLVM. The core ideas are the same that are used throughout the new pass
manager: type erased polymorphism and direct composition. The design is
as follows:
- FunctionAAResults is a type-erasing alias analysis results aggregation
interface to walk a single query across a range of results from
different alias analyses. Currently this is function-specific as we
always assume that aliasing queries are *within* a function.
- AAResultBase is a CRTP utility providing stub implementations of
various parts of the alias analysis result concept, notably in several
cases in terms of other more general parts of the interface. This can
be used to implement only a narrow part of the interface rather than
the entire interface. This isn't really ideal, this logic should be
hoisted into FunctionAAResults as currently it will cause
a significant amount of redundant work, but it faithfully models the
behavior of the prior infrastructure.
- All the alias analysis passes are ported to be wrapper passes for the
legacy PM and new-style analysis passes for the new PM with a shared
result object. In some cases (most notably CFL), this is an extremely
naive approach that we should revisit when we can specialize for the
new pass manager.
- BasicAA has been restructured to reflect that it is much more
fundamentally a function analysis because it uses dominator trees and
loop info that need to be constructed for each function.
All of the references to getting alias analysis results have been
updated to use the new aggregation interface. All the preservation and
other pass management code has been updated accordingly.
The way the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass works is to detect the
available alias analyses when run, and add them to the results object.
This means that we should be able to continue to respect when various
passes are added to the pipeline, for example adding CFL or adding TBAA
passes should just cause their results to be available and to get folded
into this. The exception to this rule is BasicAA which really needs to
be a function pass due to using dominator trees and loop info. As
a consequence, the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass directly depends on
BasicAA and always includes it in the aggregation.
This has significant implications for preserving analyses. Generally,
most passes shouldn't bother preserving FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass
because rebuilding the results just updates the set of known AA passes.
The exception to this rule are LoopPass instances which need to preserve
all the function analyses that the loop pass manager will end up
needing. This means preserving both BasicAAWrapperPass and the
aggregating FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass.
Now, when preserving an alias analysis, you do so by directly preserving
that analysis. This is only necessary for non-immutable-pass-provided
alias analyses though, and there are only three of interest: BasicAA,
GlobalsAA (formerly GlobalsModRef), and SCEVAA. Usually BasicAA is
preserved when needed because it (like DominatorTree and LoopInfo) is
marked as a CFG-only pass. I've expanded GlobalsAA into the preserved
set everywhere we previously were preserving all of AliasAnalysis, and
I've added SCEVAA in the intersection of that with where we preserve
SCEV itself.
One significant challenge to all of this is that the CGSCC passes were
actually using the alias analysis implementations by taking advantage of
a pretty amazing set of loop holes in the old pass manager's analysis
management code which allowed analysis groups to slide through in many
cases. Moving away from analysis groups makes this problem much more
obvious. To fix it, I've leveraged the flexibility the design of the new
PM components provides to just directly construct the relevant alias
analyses for the relevant functions in the IPO passes that need them.
This is a bit hacky, but should go away with the new pass manager, and
is already in many ways cleaner than the prior state.
Another significant challenge is that various facilities of the old
alias analysis infrastructure just don't fit any more. The most
significant of these is the alias analysis 'counter' pass. That pass
relied on the ability to snoop on AA queries at different points in the
analysis group chain. Instead, I'm planning to build printing
functionality directly into the aggregation layer. I've not included
that in this patch merely to keep it smaller.
Note that all of this needs a nearly complete rewrite of the AA
documentation. I'm planning to do that, but I'd like to make sure the
new design settles, and to flesh out a bit more of what it looks like in
the new pass manager first.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12080
llvm-svn: 247167
As a first step towards a new implementation of the base pointer inference algorithm, introduce an abstraction for BDVs, strengthen the assertions around them, and rewrite the BDV relation code in terms of the abstraction which includes an explicit notion of whether the BDV is also a base. The later is motivated by the fact we had a bug where insertelement was always assumed to be a base pointer even though the BDV code knew it wasn't. The strengthened assertions in this patch would have caught that bug.
The next step will be to separate the DefiningValueMap into a BDV use list cache (entirely within findBasePointers) and a base pointer cache. Having the former will allow me to use a deterministic visit order when visiting BDVs in the inference algorithm and remove a bunch of ordering related hacks. Before actually doing the last step, I'm likely going to extend the lattice with a 'BaseN' (seen only base inputs) state so that I can kill the post process optimization step.
Phabricator Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12608
llvm-svn: 246809
The visit order being used in the base pointer inference algorithm is currently non-deterministic. When working on http://reviews.llvm.org/D12583, I discovered that we were relying on a peephole optimization to get deterministic ordering in one of the test cases.
This change is intented to let me test and land http://reviews.llvm.org/D12583. The current code will not be long lived. I'm starting to investigate a rewrite of the algorithm which will combine the post-process step into the initial algorithm and make the visit order determistic. Before doing that, I wanted to make sure the existing code was complete and the test were stable. Hopefully, patches should be up for review for the new algorithm this week or early next.
llvm-svn: 246801
Fix a bug in change 246133. I didn't handle the case where we had a cycle in the use graph and could add an instruction we were about to erase back on to the worklist. Oddly, I have not been able to write a small test case for this, even with the AssertingVH added. I have confirmed the basic theory for the fix on a large failing example, but all attempts to reduce that to something appropriate for a test case have failed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12575
llvm-svn: 246718
There was infinite loop because it was trying to change assume(true) into
assume(true)
Also added handling when assume(false) appear
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12516
llvm-svn: 246697
After hitting @llvm.assume(X) we can:
- propagate equality that X == true
- if X is icmp/fcmp (with eq operation), and one of operand
is constant we can change all variables with constants in the same BasicBlock
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11918
llvm-svn: 246695
Summary:
JumpThreading shouldn't duplicate a convergent call, because that would move a convergent call into a control-inequivalent location. For example,
if (cond) {
...
} else {
...
}
convergent_call();
if (cond) {
...
} else {
...
}
should not be optimized to
if (cond) {
...
convergent_call();
...
} else {
...
convergent_call();
...
}
Test Plan: test/Transforms/JumpThreading/basic.ll
Patch by Xuetian Weng.
Reviewers: resistor, arsenm, jingyue
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12484
llvm-svn: 246415
handle more allocas with loads past the end of the alloca.
I suspect there are some related crashers with slightly different
patterns, but I'll fix those and add test cases as I find them.
Thanks to David Majnemer for the excellent test case reduction here.
Made this super simple to debug and fix.
llvm-svn: 246289
After hitting @llvm.assume(X) we can:
- propagate equality that X == true
- if X is icmp/fcmp (with eq operation), and one of operand
is constant we can change all variables with constants in the same BasicBlock
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11918
llvm-svn: 246243
... and move it into LoopUtils where it can be used by other passes, just like ReductionDescriptor. The API is very similar to ReductionDescriptor - that is, not very nice at all. Sorting these both out will come in a followup.
NFC
llvm-svn: 246145
A release fence acts as a publication barrier for stores within the current thread to become visible to other threads which might observe the release fence. It does not require the current thread to observe stores performed on other threads. As a result, we can allow store-load and load-store forwarding across a release fence.
We do need to make sure that stores before the fence can't be eliminated even if there's another store to the same location after the fence. In theory, we could reorder the second store above the fence and *then* eliminate the former, but we can't do this if the stores are on opposite sides of the fence.
Note: While more aggressive then what's there, this patch is still implementing a really conservative ordering. In particular, I'm not trying to exploit undefined behavior via races, or the fact that the LangRef says only 'atomic' accesses are ordered w.r.t. fences.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11434
llvm-svn: 246134
When computing base pointers, we introduce new instructions to propagate the base of existing instructions which might not be bases. However, the algorithm doesn't make any effort to recognize when the new instruction to be inserted is the same as an existing one already in the IR. Since this is happening immediately before rewriting, we don't really have a chance to fix it after the pass runs without teaching loop passes about statepoints.
I'm really not thrilled with this patch. I've rewritten it 4 different ways now, but this is the best I've come up with. The case where the new instruction is just the original base defining value could be merged into the existing algorithm with some complexity. The problem is that we might have something like an extractelement from a phi of two vectors. It may be trivially obvious that the base of the 0th element is an existing instruction, but I can't see how to make the algorithm itself figure that out. Thus, I resort to the call to SimplifyInstruction instead.
Note that we can only adjust the instructions we've inserted ourselves. The live sets are still being tracked in side structures at this point in the code. We can't easily muck with instructions which might be in them. Long term, I'm really thinking we need to materialize the live pointer sets explicitly in the IR somehow rather than using side structures to track them.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12004
llvm-svn: 246133
This was only added to preserve the old ScalarRepl's use of SSAUpdater
which was originally to avoid use of dominance frontiers. Now, we only
need a domtree, and we'll need a domtree right after this pass as well
and so it makes perfect sense to always and only use the dom-tree
powered mem2reg. This was flag-flipper earlier and has stuck reasonably
so I wanted to gut the now-dead code out of SROA before we waste more
time with it. Among other things, this will make passmanager porting
easier.
llvm-svn: 246028
Eventually, we will need sample profiles to be incorporated into the
inliner's cost models. To do this, we need the sample profile pass to
be a module pass.
This patch makes no functional changes beyond the mechanical adjustments
needed to run SampleProfile as a module pass.
llvm-svn: 245940
and make it always preserve debug locations, since all callers wanted this
behavior anyway.
This is addressing a post-commit review feedback for r245589.
NFC (inside the LLVM tree).
llvm-svn: 245622
Summary:
Refactor, NFC
Extracts computeOverflowForSignedAdd and isKnownNonNegative from NaryReassociate to ValueTracking in case
others need it.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11313
llvm-svn: 245591
Instruction::dropUnknownMetadata(KnownSet) is supposed to preserve all
metadata in KnownSet, but the condition for DebugLocs was inverted.
Most users of dropUnknownMetadata() actually worked around this by not
adding LLVMContext::MD_dbg to their list of KnowIDs.
This is now made explicit.
llvm-svn: 245589
Caught by the famous "DebugLoc describes the currect SubProgram" assertion.
When GVN is removing a nonlocal load it updates the debug location of the
SSA value it replaced the load with with the one of the load. In the
testcase this actually overwrites a valid debug location with an empty one.
In reality GVN has to make an arbitrary choice between two equally valid
debug locations. This patch changes to behavior to only update the
location if the value doesn't already have a debug location.
llvm-svn: 245588
Since Ashutosh made findDefsUsedOutsideOfLoop public, we can clean this
up.
Now clients that don't compute DefsUsedOutsideOfLoop can just call
versionLoop() and computing DefsUsedOutsideOfLoop will happen
implicitly. With that there is no reason to expose addPHINodes anymore.
Ashutosh, you can now drop the calls to findDefsUsedOutsideOfLoop and
addPHINodes in LVerLICM and things should just work.
llvm-svn: 245579
Usually DSE is not supposed to remove lifetime intrinsics, but it's
actually ok to remove them for dead objects in terminating blocks,
because they convey no extra information there. Until we hit a lifetime
start that cannot be removed, that is. Because from that point on the
lifetime intrinsics become interesting again, e.g. for stack coloring.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11710
llvm-svn: 245542
After hitting @llvm.assume(X) we can:
- propagate equality that X == true
- if X is icmp/fcmp (with eq operation), and one of operand
is constant we can change all variables with constants in the same BasicBlock
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11918
llvm-svn: 245265
PR24469 resulted because DeleteDeadInstruction in handleNonLocalStoreDeletion was
deleting the next basic block iterator. Fixed the same by resetting the basic block iterator
post call to DeleteDeadInstruction.
llvm-svn: 245195
This change makes ScalarEvolution a stand-alone object and just produces
one from a pass as needed. Making this work well requires making the
object movable, using references instead of overwritten pointers in
a number of places, and other refactorings.
I've also wired it up to the new pass manager and added a RUN line to
a test to exercise it under the new pass manager. This includes basic
printing support much like with other analyses.
But there is a big and somewhat scary change here. Prior to this patch
ScalarEvolution was never *actually* invalidated!!! Re-running the pass
just re-wired up the various other analyses and didn't remove any of the
existing entries in the SCEV caches or clear out anything at all. This
might seem OK as everything in SCEV that can uses ValueHandles to track
updates to the values that serve as SCEV keys. However, this still means
that as we ran SCEV over each function in the module, we kept
accumulating more and more SCEVs into the cache. At the end, we would
have a SCEV cache with every value that we ever needed a SCEV for in the
entire module!!! Yowzers. The releaseMemory routine would dump all of
this, but that isn't realy called during normal runs of the pipeline as
far as I can see.
To make matters worse, there *is* actually a key that we don't update
with value handles -- there is a map keyed off of Loop*s. Because
LoopInfo *does* release its memory from run to run, it is entirely
possible to run SCEV over one function, then over another function, and
then lookup a Loop* from the second function but find an entry inserted
for the first function! Ouch.
To make matters still worse, there are plenty of updates that *don't*
trip a value handle. It seems incredibly unlikely that today GVN or
another pass that invalidates SCEV can update values in *just* such
a way that a subsequent run of SCEV will incorrectly find lookups in
a cache, but it is theoretically possible and would be a nightmare to
debug.
With this refactoring, I've fixed all this by actually destroying and
recreating the ScalarEvolution object from run to run. Technically, this
could increase the amount of malloc traffic we see, but then again it is
also technically correct. ;] I don't actually think we're suffering from
tons of malloc traffic from SCEV because if we were, the fact that we
never clear the memory would seem more likely to have come up as an
actual problem before now. So, I've made the simple fix here. If in fact
there are serious issues with too much allocation and deallocation,
I can work on a clever fix that preserves the allocations (while
clearing the data) between each run, but I'd prefer to do that kind of
optimization with a test case / benchmark that shows why we need such
cleverness (and that can test that we actually make it faster). It's
possible that this will make some things faster by making the SCEV
caches have higher locality (due to being significantly smaller) so
until there is a clear benchmark, I think the simple change is best.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12063
llvm-svn: 245193
Some personality routines require funclet exit points to be clearly
marked, this is done by producing a token at the funclet pad and
consuming it at the corresponding ret instruction. CleanupReturnInst
already had a spot for this operand but CatchReturnInst did not.
Other personality routines don't need to use this which is why it has
been made optional.
llvm-svn: 245149
This seems to only work some of the time. In some situations,
this seems to use a nonsensical type and isn't actually aware of the
memory being accessed. e.g. if branch condition is an icmp of a pointer,
it checks the addressing mode of i1.
llvm-svn: 245137
This introduces the basic functionality to support "token types".
The motivation stems from the need to perform operations on a Value
whose provenance cannot be obscured.
There are several applications for such a type but my immediate
motivation stems from WinEH. Our personality routine enforces a
single-entry - single-exit regime for cleanups. After several rounds of
optimizations, we may be left with a terminator whose "cleanup-entry
block" is not entirely clear because control flow has merged two
cleanups together. We have experimented with using labels as operands
inside of instructions which are not terminators to indicate where we
came from but found that LLVM does not expect such exotic uses of
BasicBlocks.
Instead, we can use this new type to clearly associate the "entry point"
and "exit point" of our cleanup. This is done by having the cleanuppad
yield a Token and consuming it at the cleanupret.
The token type makes it impossible to obscure or otherwise hide the
Value, making it trivial to track the relationship between the two
points.
What is the burden to the optimizer? Well, it turns out we have already
paid down this cost by accepting that there are certain calls that we
are not permitted to duplicate, optimizations have to watch out for
such instructions anyway. There are additional places in the optimizer
that we will probably have to update but early examination has given me
the impression that this will not be heroic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11861
llvm-svn: 245029
Summary:
This patch implements my promised optimization to reunites certain sexts from
operands after we extract the constant offset. See the header comment of
reuniteExts for its motivation.
One key building block that enables this optimization is Bjarke's poison value
analysis (D11212). That helps to prove "a +nsw b" can't overflow.
Reviewers: broune
Subscribers: jholewinski, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12016
llvm-svn: 245003
AliasAnalysis in LoopIdiomRecognize.
The previous commit to LIR, r244879, exposed some scary bug in the loop
pass pipeline with an assert failure that showed up on several bots.
This patch got reverted as part of getting that revision reverted, but
they're actually independent and unrelated. This patch has no functional
change and should be completely safe. It is also useful for my current
work on the AA infrastructure.
llvm-svn: 244993
We used to be over-conservative about preserving inbounds. Actually, the second
GEP (which applies the constant offset) can inherit the inbounds attribute of
the original GEP, because the resultant pointer is equivalent to that of the
original GEP. For example,
x = GEP inbounds a, i+5
=>
y = GEP a, i // inbounds removed
x = GEP inbounds y, 5 // inbounds preserved
llvm-svn: 244937
DeadStoreElimination does eliminate a store if it stores a value which was loaded from the same memory location.
So far this worked only if the store is in the same block as the load.
Now we can also handle stores which are in a different block than the load.
Example:
define i32 @test(i1, i32*) {
entry:
%l2 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4
br i1 %0, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
br label %bb3
bb2:
; This store is redundant
store i32 %l2, i32* %1, align 4
br label %bb3
bb3:
ret i32 0
}
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11854
llvm-svn: 244901
simplified form to remove redundant checks and simplify the code for
popcount recognition. We don't actually need to handle all of these
cases.
I've left a FIXME for one in particular until I finish inspecting to
make sure we don't actually *rely* on the predicate in any way.
llvm-svn: 244879
Summary: This patch moves the check of OptimizeForSize before traversing over all basic blocks in current loop. If OptimizeForSize is set to true, no non-trivial unswitch is ever allowed. Therefore, the early exit will help reduce compilation time. This patch should be NFC.
Reviewers: reames, weimingz, broune
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11997
llvm-svn: 244868
code into methods on LoopIdiomRecognize.
This simplifies the code somewhat and also makes it much easier to move
the analyses around. Ultimately, the separate class wasn't providing
significant value over methods -- it contained the precondition basic
block and the current loop. The current loop is already available and
the precondition block wasn't needed everywhere and is easy to pass
around.
In several cases I just moved things to be static functions because they
already accepted most of their inputs as arguments.
This doesn't fix the way we manage analyses yet, that will be the next
patch, but it already makes the code over 50 lines shorter.
No functionality changed.
llvm-svn: 244851
complexity.
There is only one function that was called from multiple locations, and
that was 'getBranch' which has a reasonable one-line spelling already:
dyn_cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator). We could make this shorter, but
it doesn't seem to add much value. Instead, we should avoid calling it
so many times on the same basic blocks, but that will be in a subsequent
patch.
The other functions are only called in one location, so inline them
there, and take advantage of this to use direct early exit and reduce
indentation. This makes it much more clear what is being tested for, and
in fact makes it clear now to me that there are simpler ways to do this
work. However, this patch just does the mechanical inlining. I'll clean
up the functionality of the code to leverage loop simplified form more
effectively in a follow-up.
Despite lots of early line breaks due to early-exit, this is still
shorter than it was before.
llvm-svn: 244841
a significant code cleanup here.
The handling of analyses in this pass is overly complex and can be
simplified significantly, but the right way to do that is to simplify
all of the code not just the analyses, and that'll require pretty
extensive edits that would be noisy with formatting changes mixed into
them.
llvm-svn: 244828
To be clear: this is an *optimization* not a correctness change.
CodeGenPrep likes to duplicate icmps feeding branch instructions to take advantage of x86's ability to fuze many comparison/branch patterns into a single micro-op and to reduce the need for materializing i1s into general registers. PlaceSafepoints likes to place safepoint polls right at the end of basic blocks (immediately before terminators) when inserting entry and backedge safepoints. These two heuristics interact in a somewhat unfortunate way where the branch terminating the original block will be controlled by a condition driven by unrelocated pointers. This forces the register allocator to keep both the relocated and unrelocated values of the pointers feeding the icmp alive over the safepoint poll.
One simple fix would have been to just adjust PlaceSafepoints to move one back in the basic block, but you can reach similar cases as a result of LICM or other hoisting passes. As a result, doing a post insertion fixup seems to be more robust.
I considered doing this in CodeGenPrep itself, but having to update the live sets of already rewritten safepoints gets complicated fast. In particular, you can't just use def/use information because by moving the icmp, we're extending the live range of it's inputs potentially.
Instead, this patch teaches RewriteStatepointsForGC to make the required adjustments before making the relocations explicit in the IR. This change really highlights the fact that RSForGC is a CodeGenPrep-like pass which is performing target specific lowering. In the long run, we may even want to combine the two though this would require a lot more smarts to be integrated into RSForGC first. We currently rely on being able to run a set of cleanup passes post rewriting because the IR RSForGC generates is pretty damn ugly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11819
llvm-svn: 244821
When rewriting the IR such that base pointers are available for every live pointer, we potentially need to duplicate instructions to propagate the base. The original code had only handled PHI and Select under the belief those were the only instructions which would need duplicated. When I added support for vector instructions, I'd added a collection of hacks for ExtractElement which caught most of the common cases. Of course, I then found the one test case my hacks couldn't cover. :)
This change removes all of the early hacks for extract element. By defining extractelement as a BDV (rather than trying to look through it), we can extend the rewriting algorithm to duplicate the extract as needed. Note that a couple of peephole optimizations were left in for the moment, because while we now handle extractelement as a first class citizen, we're not yet handling insertelement. That change will follow in the near future.
llvm-svn: 244808
just depend on it directly.
This was particularly frustrating because there was a really wide
mixture of using a member variable and re-extracting it from the AA that
happened to be around. I think the result is much more clear.
I've also deleted all of the pointless null checks and used references
across the APIs where I could to make it explicit that this cannot be
null in a useful fashion.
llvm-svn: 244780
This change adds the unroll metadata "llvm.loop.unroll.enable" which directs
the optimizer to unroll a loop fully if the trip count is known at compile time, and
unroll partially if the trip count is not known at compile time. This differs from
"llvm.loop.unroll.full" which explicitly does not unroll a loop if the trip count is not
known at compile time.
The "llvm.loop.unroll.enable" is intended to be added for loops annotated with
"#pragma unroll".
llvm-svn: 244466
The scalarizer can cache incorrect entries when walking up a chain of
insertelement instructions. This occurs when it encounters more than one
instruction that it is not actively searching for, as it unconditionally caches
every element it finds. The fix is to only cache the first element that it
isn't searching for so we don't overwrite correct entries.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11559
llvm-svn: 244448
This is the full set of checks that clients can further filter. IOW,
it's client-agnostic. This makes LAA complete in the sense that it now
provides the two main results of its analysis precomputed:
1. memory dependences via getDepChecker().getInsterestingDependences()
2. run-time checks via getRuntimePointerCheck().getChecks()
However, as a consequence we now compute this information pro-actively.
Thus if the client decides to skip the loop based on the dependences
we've computed the checks unnecessarily. In order to see whether this
was a significant overhead I checked compile time on SPEC2k6 LTO bitcode
files. The change was in the noise.
The checks are generated in canCheckPtrAtRT, at the same place where we
used to call groupChecks to merge checks.
llvm-svn: 244368
After r244074, we now have a successors() method to iterate over
all the successors of a TerminatorInst. This commit changes a bunch
of eligible loops to use it.
llvm-svn: 244260
iisUnmovableInstruction() had a list of instructions hardcoded which are
considered unmovable. The list lacked (at least) an entry for the va_arg
and cmpxchg instructions.
Fix this by introducing a new Instruction::mayBeMemoryDependent()
instead of maintaining another instruction list.
Patch by Matthias Braun <matze@braunis.de>.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11577
rdar://problem/22118647
llvm-svn: 244244
This is the first mechanical step in preparation for making this and all
the other alias analysis passes available to the new pass manager. I'm
factoring out all the totally boring changes I can so I'm moving code
around here with no other changes. I've even minimized the formatting
churn.
I'll reformat and freshen comments on the interface now that its located
in the right place so that the substantive changes don't triger this.
llvm-svn: 244197
around a DataLayout interface in favor of directly querying DataLayout.
This wrapper specifically helped handle the case where this no
DataLayout, but LLVM now requires it simplifynig all of this. I've
updated callers to directly query DataLayout. This in turn exposed
a bunch of places where we should have DataLayout readily available but
don't which I've fixed. This then in turn exposed that we were passing
DataLayout around in a bunch of arguments rather than making it readily
available so I've also fixed that.
No functionality changed.
llvm-svn: 244189
Create wrapper methods in the Function class for the OptimizeForSize and MinSize
attributes. We want to hide the logic of "or'ing" them together when optimizing
just for size (-Os).
Currently, we are not consistent about this and rely on a front-end to always set
OptimizeForSize (-Os) if MinSize (-Oz) is on. Thus, there are 18 FIXME changes here
that should be added as follow-on patches with regression tests.
This patch is NFC-intended: it just replaces existing direct accesses of the attributes
by the equivalent wrapper call.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11734
llvm-svn: 243994
This change was done as an audit and is by inspection. The new EH
system is still very much a work in progress. NFC for the landingpad
case.
llvm-svn: 243965
through PHI nodes across iterations.
This patch teaches the new advanced loop unrolling heuristics to propagate
constants into the loop from the preheader and around the backedge after
simulating each iteration. This lets us brute force solve simple recurrances
that aren't modeled effectively by SCEV. It also makes it more clear why we
need to process the loop in-order rather than bottom-up which might otherwise
make much more sense (for example, for DCE).
This came out of an attempt I'm making to develop a principled way to account
for dead code in the unroll estimation. When I implemented
a forward-propagating version of that it produced incorrect results due to
failing to propagate *cost* between loop iterations through the PHI nodes, and
it occured to me we really should at least propagate simplifications across
those edges, and it is quite easy thanks to the loop being in canonical and
LCSSA form.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11706
llvm-svn: 243900
This introduces new instructions neccessary to implement MSVC-compatible
exception handling support. Most of the middle-end and none of the
back-end haven't been audited or updated to take them into account.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11097
llvm-svn: 243766
Before, we were passing the pointer partitions to LAA. Now, we get all
the checks from LAA and filter out the checks within partitions in
LoopDistribution.
This effectively concludes the steps to move filtering memchecks from
LAA into its clients. There is still some cleanup left to remove the
unused interfaces in LAA that still take PtrPartition.
(Moving this functionality to LoopDistribution also requires
needsChecking on pointers to be made public.)
llvm-svn: 243613
Bonus change to remove emacs major mode marker from SystemZMachineFunctionInfo.cpp because emacs already knows it's C++ from the extension. Also fix typo "appeary" in AMDGPUMCAsmInfo.h.
llvm-svn: 243585
Summary:
As added initially, statepoints required their call targets to be a
constant pointer null if ``numPatchBytes`` was non-zero. This turns out
to be a problem ergonomically, since there is no way to mark patchable
statepoints as calling a (readable) symbolic value.
This change remove the restriction of requiring ``null`` call targets
for patchable statepoints, and changes PlaceSafepoints to maintain the
symbolic call target through its transformation.
Reviewers: reames, swaroop.sridhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11550
llvm-svn: 243502
Before the patch, the checks were generated internally in
addRuntimeCheck. Now, we use the new overloaded version of
addRuntimeCheck that takes the ready-made set of checks as a parameter.
The checks are now generated by the client (LoopDistribution) with the
new RuntimePointerChecking::generateChecks API.
Also the new printChecks API is used to print out the checks for
debugging.
This is to continue the transition over to the new model whereby clients
will get the full set of checks from LAA, filter it and then pass it to
LoopVersioning and in turn to addRuntimeCheck.
llvm-svn: 243382
Summary:
If a scale or a base register can be rewritten as "Zext({A,+,1})" then
LSR will now consider a formula of that form in its normal cost
computation.
Depends on D9180
Reviewers: qcolombet, atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9181
llvm-svn: 243348
This reverts commit r243167.
Duncan pointed out that dyn_cast can return null in these cases, so this
was an unsafe commit to make. Sorry for the noise.
Worryingly there were no tests which fail...
llvm-svn: 243302
r243250 appeared to break clang/test/Analysis/dead-store.c on one of the build
slaves, but I couldn't reproduce this failure locally. Probably a false
positive as I saw this test was broken by r243246 or r243247 too but passed
later without people fixing anything.
llvm-svn: 243253
Summary:
This patch updates TargetTransformInfoImplCRTPBase::getGEPCost to consider
addressing modes. It now returns TCC_Free when the GEP can be completely folded
to an addresing mode.
I started this patch as I refactored SLSR. Function isGEPFoldable looks common
and is indeed used by some WIP of mine. So I extracted that logic to getGEPCost.
Furthermore, I noticed getGEPCost wasn't directly tested anywhere. The best
testing bed seems CostModel, but its getInstructionCost method invokes
getAddressComputationCost for GEPs which provides very coarse estimation. So
this patch also makes getInstructionCost call the updated getGEPCost for GEPs.
This change inevitably breaks some tests because the cost model changes, but
nothing looks seriously wrong -- if we believe the new cost model is the right
way to go, these tests should be updated.
This patch is not perfect yet -- the comments in some tests need to be updated.
I want to know whether this is a right approach before fixing those details.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel
Subscribers: aschwaighofer, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9819
llvm-svn: 243250
Summary:
This patch improves trivial loop unswitch.
The current trivial loop unswitch only checks if loop header's terminator contains a trivial unswitch condition. But if the loop header only has one reachable successor (due to intentionally or unintentionally missed code simplification), we should consider the successor as part of the loop header. Therefore, instead of stopping at loop header's terminator, we should keep traversing its successors within loop until reach a *real* conditional branch or switch (whose condition can not be constant folded). This change will enable a single -loop-unswitch pass to unswitch multiple trivial conditions (unswitch one trivial condition could open opportunity to unswitch another one in the same loop), while the old implementation can unswitch only one per pass.
Reviewers: reames, broune
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11481
llvm-svn: 243203
This patch extend LoopReroll pass to hand the loops which
is similar to the following:
while (len > 1) {
sum4 += buf[len];
sum4 += buf[len-1];
len -= 2;
}
llvm-svn: 243171
Since both places which set this variable do so with dyn_cast, and not
dyn_cast_or_null, its impossible to get a nullptr here, so we can remove
the check.
llvm-svn: 243167
Instead of the pattern
for (auto I = x.rbegin(), E = x.end(); I != E; ++I)
we can use make_range to construct the reverse range and iterate using
that instead.
llvm-svn: 243163
The names for instructions inserted were previous dependent on iteration order. By deriving the names from the original instructions, we can avoid instability in tests without resorting to ordered traversals. It also makes the IR mildly easier to read at large scale.
llvm-svn: 243140
Summary:
Resolving a branch allows us to ignore blocks that won't be executed, and thus make our estimate more accurate.
This patch is intended to be applied after D10205 (though it could be applied independently).
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10206
llvm-svn: 243084
The new code should hopefully be equivalent to the old code; it just uses a worklist to track instructions which need to visited rather than iterating over all instructions visited each time. This should be faster, but the primary benefit is that the purpose should be more clear and the diff of adding another instruction type (forthcoming) much more obvious.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11480
llvm-svn: 243071
Deleting much of the code using trace-rewrite-statepoints and use idiomatic DEBUG statements instead. This includes adding operator<< to a helper class.
llvm-svn: 243054
We don't need to pass in the map from BDV to PhiStates; we can instead handle that externally and let the MeetPhiStates helper class just meet PhiStates.
llvm-svn: 243045
Summary:
Scalarizer has two data structures that hold information about changes
to the function, Gathered and Scattered. These are cleared in finish()
at the end of runOnFunction() if finish() detects any changes to the
function.
However, finish() was checking for changes by only checking if
Gathered was non-empty. The function visitStore() only modifies
Scattered without touching Gathered. As a result, Scattered could have
ended up having stale data if Scalarizer only scalarized store
instructions. Since the data in Scattered is used during the execution
of the pass, this introduced dangling pointer errors.
The fix is to check whether both Scattered and Gathered are empty
before deciding what to do in finish(). This also fixes a problem
where the Function can be modified although the pass returns false.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: rnk, srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10459
llvm-svn: 243040
the general GMR-in-non-LTO flag.
Without this, we have the global information during the CGSCC pipeline
for GVN and such, but don't have it available during the late loop
optimizations such as the vectorizer. Moreover, after the CGSCC pipeline
has finished we have substantially more accurate and refined call graph
information, function annotations, etc, which will make GMR even more
powerful than it is early in the pipelien.
Note that we have to play silly games with preserving AliasAnalysis
(which is now trivially preserved) in order to let a module analysis
magically be preserved into the entire function pass pipeline.
Simultaneously we have to not make GMR an immutable pass in order to be
able to re-run it and collect fresh data on the final call graph.
llvm-svn: 242999
preparation for de-coupling the AA implementations.
In order to do this, they had to become fake-scoped using the
traditional LLVM pattern of a leading initialism. These can't be actual
scoped enumerations because they're bitfields and thus inherently we use
them as integers.
I've also renamed the behavior enums that are specific to reasoning
about the mod/ref behavior of functions when called. This makes it more
clear that they have a very narrow domain of applicability.
I think there is a significantly cleaner API for all of this, but
I don't want to try to do really substantive changes for now, I just
want to refactor the things away from analysis groups so I'm preserving
the exact original design and just cleaning up the names, style, and
lifting out of the class.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10564
llvm-svn: 242963
through APIs that are no longer necessary now that the update API has
been removed.
This will make changes to the AA interfaces significantly less
disruptive (I hope). Either way, it seems like a really nice cleanup.
llvm-svn: 242882
Summary: The current code in LoopUnswtich::processCurrentLoop() mixes trivial loop unswitch and non-trivial loop unswitch together. It goes over all basic blocks in the loop and checks if a condition is trivial or non-trivial unswitch condition. However, trivial unswitch condition can only occur in the loop header basic block (where it controls whether or not the loop does something at all). This refactoring separate trivial loop unswitch and non-trivial loop unswitch. Before going over all basic blocks in the loop, it checks if the loop header contains a trivial unswitch condition. If so, unswitch it. Otherwise, go over all blocks like before but don't check trivial condition any more since they are not possible to be in the other blocks. This code has no functionality change.
Reviewers: meheff, reames, broune
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11276
llvm-svn: 242873
types and loads, loads or stores widened past the size of an alloca,
etc.
This started off with a bug report about big-endian behavior with
bitfields and loads and stores to a { i32, i24 } struct. An initial
attempt to fix this was sent for review in D10357, but that didn't
really get to the root of the problem.
The core issue was that canConvertValue and convertValue in SROA were
handling different bitwidth integers by doing a zext of the integer. It
wouldn't do a trunc though, only a zext! This would in turn lead SROA to
form an i24 load from an i24 alloca, zext it to i32, and then use it.
This would at least produce the wrong value for big-endian systems.
One of my many false starts here was to correct the computation for
big-endian systems by shifting. But this doesn't actually work because
the original code has a 64-bit store to the entire 8 bytes, and a 32-bit
load of the last 4 bytes, and because the alloc size is 8 bytes, we
can't lose that last (least significant if bigendian) byte! The real
problem here is that we're forming an i24 load in SROA which is actually
not sufficiently wide to load all of the necessary bits here. The source
has an i32 load, and SROA needs to form that as well.
The straightforward way to do this is to disable the zext logic in
canConvertValue and convertValue, forcing us to actually load all
32-bits. This seems like a really good change, but it in turn breaks
several other parts of SROA.
First in the chain of knock-on failures, we had places where we were
doing integer-widening promotion even though some of the integer loads
or stores extended *past the end* of the alloca's memory! There was even
a comment about preventing this, but it only prevented the case where
the type had a different bit size from its store size. So I added checks
to handle the cases where we actually have a widened load or store and
to avoid trying to special integer widening promotion in those cases.
Second, we actually rely on the ability to promote in the face of loads
past the end of an alloca! This is important so that we can (for
example) speculate loads around PHI nodes to do more promotion. The bits
loaded are garbage, but as long as they aren't used and the alignment is
suitable high (which it wasn't in the test case!) this is "fine". And we
can't stop promoting here, lots of things stop working well if we do. So
we need to add specific logic to handle the extension (and truncation)
case, but *only* where that extension or truncation are over bytes that
*are outside the alloca's allocated storage* and thus totally bogus to
load or store.
And of course, once we add back this correct handling of extension or
truncation, we need to correctly handle bigendian systems to avoid
re-introducing the exact bug that started us off on this chain of misery
in the first place, but this time even more subtle as it only happens
along speculated loads atop a PHI node.
I've ported an existing test for PHI speculation to the big-endian test
file and checked that we get that part correct, and I've added several
more interesting big-endian test cases that should help check that we're
getting this correct.
Fun times.
llvm-svn: 242869
A bit more code cleanup: delete some a trivial true assertion and supporting code, remove a redundant cast, and use count in assertions where feasible.
llvm-svn: 242805
We can use builders to simplify part of the code and we only check for the existance of the metadata value; this enables us to delete some redundant code.
llvm-svn: 242751
directly model in the new PM.
This also was an incredibly brittle and expensive update API that was
never fully utilized by all the passes that claimed to preserve AA, nor
could it reasonably have been extended to all of them. Any number of
places add uses of values. If we ever wanted to reliably instrument
this, we would want a callback hook much like we have with ValueHandles,
but doing this for every use addition seems *extremely* expensive in
terms of compile time.
The only user of this update mechanism is GlobalsModRef. The idea of
using this to keep it up to date doesn't really work anyways as its
analysis requires a symmetric analysis of two different memory
locations. It would be very hard to make updates be sufficiently
rigorous to *guarantee* symmetric analysis in this way, and it pretty
certainly isn't true today.
However, folks have been using GMR with this update for a long time and
seem to not be hitting the issues. The reported issue that the update
hook fixes isn't even a problem any more as other changes to
GetUnderlyingObject worked around it, and that issue stemmed from *many*
years ago. As a consequence, a prior patch provided a flag to control
the unsafe behavior of GMR, and this patch removes the update mechanism
that has questionable compile-time tradeoffs and is causing problems
with moving to the new pass manager. Note the lack of test updates --
not one test in tree actually requires this update, even for a contrived
case.
All of this was extensively discussed on the dev list, this patch will
just enact what that discussion decides on. I'm sending it for review in
part to show what I'm planning, and in part to show the *amazing* amount
of work this avoids. Every call to the AA here is something like three
to six indirect function calls, which in the non-LTO pipeline never do
any work! =[
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11214
llvm-svn: 242605
This new wrapper pass is useful when we want to do branch probability analysis conditionally (e.g. only in PGO mode) but don't want to add one more pass dependence.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11241
llvm-svn: 242349
Summary:
This is a trivial code change with no functionality effect.
When LoopUnswitch determines trivial unswitch condition, it checks whether the loop header's terminator instruction is a branch instruction or switch instruction since trivial unswitch condition can only apply to these two instruction types. The current code does not fail the check directly on other instruction types, but check the nullness of LoopExitBB variable instead. The added else clause makes the check fail immediately on other instruction types and makes the code more obvious.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11239
llvm-svn: 242345
During estimation of unrolling effect we should be able to propagate
constants through casts.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10207
llvm-svn: 242257
I am planning to add more nested classes inside RuntimePointerCheck so
all these triple-nesting would be hard to follow.
Also rename it to RuntimePointerChecking (i.e. append 'ing').
llvm-svn: 242218
Sometimes an incidentally created instruction can duplicate a Value used
elsewhere. It then often doesn't end up in the leader table. If it's later
removed, we attempt to remove it from the leader table and segfault.
Instead we should just ignore the removal request, which won't cause any
problems. The reverse situation, where the original instruction is replaced by
the new one (which you might think could leave the leader table empty) cannot
occur, because the incidental instruction will never be found in the first
place.
llvm-svn: 242199
Volatile loads and stores are made visible in global state regardless of
what memory is involved. It is not correct to disregard the ordering
and synchronization scope because it is possible to synchronize with
memory operations performed by hardware.
This partially addresses PR23737.
llvm-svn: 242126
When spotting that a loop can use ctpop, we were incorrectly replacing all uses of a value with a value derived from ctpop.
The bug here was exposed because we were replacing a use prior to the ctpop with the ctpop value and so we have a use before def, i.e., we changed
%tobool.5 = icmp ne i32 %num, 0
store i1 %tobool.5, i1* %ptr
br i1 %tobool.5, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end
to
store i1 %1, i1* %ptr
%0 = call i32 @llvm.ctpop.i32(i32 %num)
%1 = icmp ne i32 %0, 0
br i1 %1, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end
Even if we inserted the ctpop so that it dominates the store here, that would still be incorrect. The store doesn’t want the result of ctpop.
The fix is very simple, and involves replacing only the branch condition with the ctpop instead of all uses.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 242068
Enable runtime unrolling for loops with unroll count metadata ("#pragma unroll N")
and a runtime trip count. Also, do not unroll loops with unroll full metadata if the
loop has a runtime loop count. Previously, such loops would be unrolled with a
very large threshold (pragma-unroll-threshold) if runtime unrolled happened to be
enabled resulting in a very large (and likely unwise) unroll factor.
llvm-svn: 242047
Passes should never modify it, just use the const version. While there
reduce copying in LoopInterchange. No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 242041
There is no suitable basic block to sink instructions in loops without
exits. The only way an instruction in a loop without exits can be used
is as an incoming value to a PHI. In such cases, the incoming block for
the corresponding value is unreachable.
This fixes PR24013.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10903
llvm-svn: 241987
No in-tree alias analysis used this facility, and it was not called in
any particularly rigorous way, so it seems unlikely to be correct.
Note that one of the only stateful AA implementations in-tree,
GlobalsModRef is completely broken currently (and any AA passes like it
are equally broken) because Module AA passes are not effectively
invalidated when a function pass that fails to update the AA stack runs.
Ultimately, it doesn't seem like we know how we want to build stateful
AA, and until then trying to support and maintain correctness for an
untested API is essentially impossible. To that end, I'm planning to rip
out all of the update API. It can return if and when we need it and know
how to build it on top of the new pass manager and as part of *tested*
stateful AA implementations in the tree.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10889
llvm-svn: 241975
Summary:
The class will obviously need improvement down the road. For one, there
is no reason that addPHINodes would have to be exposed like that. I
will make this and other improvements in follow-up patches.
The main goal is to be able to share this functionality. The
LoopLoadElimination pass I am working on needs it too. Later we can
move other clients as well (LV and Ashutosh's LICMVer).
Reviewers: hfinkel, ashutosh.nema
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10577
llvm-svn: 241932
Summary:
This makes them available to the LoopVersioning class as that is moved
to its own module in the next patch.
Reviewers: ashutosh.nema, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10576
llvm-svn: 241931
Summary:
This introduces new instructions neccessary to implement MSVC-compatible
exception handling support. Most of the middle-end and none of the
back-end haven't been audited or updated to take them into account.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, reames, nlewycky, rjmccall
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11041
llvm-svn: 241888
Summary:
In RewriteLoopExitValues, before expanding out an SCEV expression using
SCEVExpander, try to see if an existing LLVM IR expression already
computes the value we're interested in. If so use that existing
expression.
Apart from reducing IndVars' reliance on the rest of the compilation
pipeline, this also prevents IndVars from concluding some expressions as
"high cost" when they're not. For instance,
`InductiveRangeCheckElimination` often emits code of the following form:
```
len = umin(len_A, len_B)
loop:
...
if (i++ < len)
goto loop
outside_loop:
use(i)
```
`SCEVExpander` refuses to rewrite the use of `i` in `outside_loop`,
since it thinks the value of `i` on loop exit, `len`, is a high cost
expansion since it contains an `umax` in it. With this change,
`IndVars` can see that it can re-use `len` instead of creating a new
expression to compute `umin(len_A, len_B)`.
I considered putting this cleverness in `SCEVExpander`, but I was
worried that it may then have a deterimental effect on other passes
that use it. So I decided it was better to just do this in the one
place where it seems like an obviously good idea, with the intent of
generalizing later if needed.
Reviewers: atrick, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10782
llvm-svn: 241838
Summary:
Initially, these intrinsics seemed like part of a family of "frame"
related intrinsics, but now I think that's more confusing than helpful.
Initially, the LangRef specified that this would create a new kind of
allocation that would be allocated at a fixed offset from the frame
pointer (EBP/RBP). We ended up dropping that design, and leaving the
stack frame layout alone.
These intrinsics are really about sharing local stack allocations, not
frame pointers. I intend to go further and add an `llvm.localaddress()`
intrinsic that returns whatever register (EBP, ESI, ESP, RBX) is being
used to address locals, which should not be confused with the frame
pointer.
Naming suggestions at this point are welcome, I'm happy to re-run sed.
Reviewers: majnemer, nicholas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11011
llvm-svn: 241633
This reverts commit r241602. We had a latent bug in SCCP where we would
make a basic block empty and then proceed to ask questions about it's
terminator.
llvm-svn: 241616
Surprisingly, this is a correctness issue: the mmx type exists for
calling convention purposes, LLVM doesn't have a zero representation for
them.
This partially fixes PR23999.
llvm-svn: 241142
Summary:
nsw are flaky and can often be removed by optimizations. This patch enhances
nsw by leveraging @llvm.assume in the IR. Specifically, NaryReassociate now
understands that
assume(a + b >= 0) && assume(a >= 0) ==> a +nsw b
As a result, it can split more sext(a + b) into sext(a) + sext(b) for CSE.
Test Plan: nary-gep.ll
Reviewers: broune, meheff
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10822
llvm-svn: 241139
This change extends the detection of base pointers for vector constructs to handle arbitrary phi and select nodes. The existing non-vector code already handles those, so this is basically just extending the vector special case to be less special cased. It still isn't generalized vector handling since we can't handle arbitrary vector instructions (e.g. shufflevectors), but it's a lot closer.
The general structure of the change is as follows:
* Extend the base defining value relation over a subset of vector instructions and vector typed phi & select instructions.
* Move scalarization from before base pointer rewriting to after base pointer rewriting. The extension of the BDV relation is sufficient to find vector base phis for vector inputs.
* Preserve the existing special case logic for when the base of a vector element is locally obvious. This general idea could be extended to the scalar case as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10461#inline-84275
llvm-svn: 240850
This previously caused miscompilations as a result of phi nodes receiving
undef incoming values from blocks dominated by such successors.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10726
llvm-svn: 240670
r240214 fixed some UB in IndVarSimplify, and it needed a temporary
`WeakVH` to do it. Add `simplify_type<const WeakVH>` so that this
temporary isn't necessary.
llvm-svn: 240599
We performed a simple, but incomplete, intersection when it came time to
CSE instructions. It didn't handle, for example, the 'exact' flag.
This fixes PR23922.
llvm-svn: 240595
Reassociate mutated existing instructions in order to form negations
which would create additional reassociate opportunities.
This fixes PR23926.
llvm-svn: 240593
Change 1: Unswitching on trivial conditions should always happen regardless of the computed unswitching cost, as really the cost is zero. While there is code to make that happen, the logic that checks the unswitching cost against a threshold was moved to an earlier point (revision 147935) than the point where trivial unswitching is detected, so trivial unswitching is currently blocked by the cost threshold. This change fixes that.
Change 2: Before revision 147935 (from 2012-01-11), the threshold parameter was a per-loop threshold. So an unswitching happened only if the cost of the unswitching was less than the threshold. In an indirect way (and I believe unintentionally), the logic for this since then has been that the threshold is an over-all budget across all loops for all loop unswitching done by a given LoopUnswitch loop pass object. So if an unswitching with cost 100 happens in one function, that in effect reduces the threshold from 100 to 0 for the loops even in another function. This persists for the lifetime of that loop pass object. This makes no difference for most small examples but it is important for large examples. This revision fixes that.
Change 3: The cost is currently calculated as std::min(NumInstructions, 5 * NumBlocks). So a loop with 2 blocks and a million instructions will have an unswitching cost of 10. I changed this to just NumInstructions, as it were before revision 147935, though I'm open to e.g. instead replacing std::min with std::max.
I've tried to make the change minimally invasive while staying with what I think was the original intent of the code.
Submitted on behalf of broune@.
llvm-svn: 240438
As with the previous patch, the goal is to turn the class into a general
loop-versioning class. This patch removes any references to loop
distribution.
llvm-svn: 240352
Calling operator* on a WeakVH whose Value is null hits undefined
behaviour, since we bind the value to a reference. Instead, go through
`operator Value*` so that we work with the pointer itself.
Found by ubsan.
llvm-svn: 240214
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
This is now living in MemoryLocation, which is what it pertains to. It
is also an enum there rather than a static data member which is left
never defined.
llvm-svn: 239886
that it is its own entity in the form of MemoryLocation, and update all
the callers.
This is an entirely mechanical change. References to "Location" within
AA subclases become "MemoryLocation", and elsewhere
"AliasAnalysis::Location" becomes "MemoryLocation". Hope that helps
out-of-tree folks update.
llvm-svn: 239885
A reduction is a special kind of recurrence. In the loop vectorizer we currently
identify basic reductions. Future patches will extend this to identifying basic
recurrences.
llvm-svn: 239835
This change is hopefully NFC. The only tricky part is that I changed the context instruction being used to the branch rather than the comparison. I believe both to be correct, but the branch is strictly more powerful. With the moved code, using the branch instruction is required for the basic block comparison test to return the same result. The previous code was able to directly access both the branch and the comparison where the revised code is not.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9652
llvm-svn: 239797
Summary:
Scalarizer has two data structures that hold information about changes
to the function, Gathered and Scattered. These are cleared in finish()
at the end of runOnFunction() if finish() detects any changes to the
function.
However, finish() was checking for changes by only checking if
Gathered was non-empty. The function visitStore() only modifies
Scattered without touching Gathered. As a result, Scattered could have
ended up having stale data if Scalarizer only scalarized store
instructions. Since the data in Scattered is used during the execution
of the pass, this introduced dangling pointer errors.
The fix is to check whether both Scattered and Gathered are empty
before deciding what to do in finish().
Reviewers: srhines
Reviewed By: srhines
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10422
llvm-svn: 239644
Summary:
A side effect of this change is that it IRBuilder now automatically
created debug info locations for new instructions, which is the
same as debug location of insertion point. This is fine for the
functions in questions (GetStoreValueForLoad and
GetMemInstValueForLoad), as they are used in two situations:
* GVN::processLoad, which tries to eliminate a load. In this case
new instructions would have the same debug location as the load they
eventually replace;
* MaterializeAdjustedValue, which adds new instructions to the end
of the basic blocks, which could later be used to replace the load
definition. In this case we don't yet know the way the load would
be eventually replaced (either by assembling the precomputed values
via PHI, or by using them directly), so just using the basic block
strategy seems to be reasonable. There is also a special case
in the code that *would* adjust the location of the last
instruction replacing the load definition to the location of the
load.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: echristo, dberlin, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10405
llvm-svn: 239585
This only updates one of the uses. The other is used in cases
that may never touch memory, so I'm not sure why this is even
calling it. Perhaps there should be a new, similar hook for such
cases or pass -1 for unknown address space.
llvm-svn: 239540
Determining proper debug locations for instructions created in
PHITransAddr is tricky. We use a simple approach here and simply copy
debug locations from instructions computing load address to
"corresponding" instructions re-creating the address computation
in predecessor basic blocks.
This may not always be correct, given all the rearrangement and
simplification going on, and debug locations may jump around a lot,
as the basic blocks we copy locations between may be very far from
each other.
Still, this would work good in most simple cases (e.g. when chain
of address computing instruction is short, or our mapping turns out
to be 1-to-1), and we desire to have *some* reasonable debug locations
associated with newly inserted instructions.
See http://reviews.llvm.org/D10351 review thread for more details.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: spatel, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10351
llvm-svn: 239479
that was resetting it.
Remove the uses of DisableTailCalls in subclasses of TargetLowering and use
the value of function attribute "disable-tail-calls" instead. Also,
unconditionally add pass TailCallElim to the pipeline and check the function
attribute at the start of runOnFunction to disable the pass on a per-function
basis.
This is part of the work to remove TargetMachine::resetTargetOptions, and since
DisableTailCalls was the last non-fast-math option that was being reset in that
function, we should be able to remove the function entirely after the work to
propagate IR-level fast-math flags to DAG nodes is completed.
Out-of-tree users should remove the uses of DisableTailCalls and make changes
to attach attribute "disable-tail-calls"="true" or "false" to the functions in
the IR.
rdar://problem/13752163
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10099
llvm-svn: 239427
on a per-function basis.
Previously some of the passes were conditionally added to ARM's pass pipeline
based on the target machine's subtarget. This patch makes changes to add those
passes unconditionally and execute them conditonally based on the predicate
functor passed to the pass constructors. This enables running different sets of
passes for different functions in the module.
rdar://problem/20542263
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8717
llvm-svn: 239325
Summary:
Using some SCEV functionality helped to entirely remove SCEVCache class and FindConstantPointers SCEV visitor.
Also, this makes the code more universal - I'll take advandate of it in next patches where I start handling additional types of instructions.
Test Plan: Tests would be submitted in subsequent patches.
Reviewers: atrick, chandlerc
Reviewed By: atrick, chandlerc
Subscribers: atrick, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10205
llvm-svn: 239282
Summary:
canUnrollCompletely takes `unsigned` values for `UnrolledCost` and
`RolledDynamicCost` but is passed in `uint64_t`s that are silently
truncated. Because of this, when `UnrolledSize` is a large integer
that has a small remainder with UINT32_MAX, LLVM tries to completely
unroll loops with high trip counts.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10293
llvm-svn: 239218
CVP wants to analyze the condition operand of a select along an edge.
It succeeds in getting back a Constant but not a ConstantInt. Instead,
it gets a ConstantExpr. It then assumes that the Constant must be equal
to false because it isn't equal to true.
Instead, perform an additional comparison.
This fixes PR23752.
llvm-svn: 239217
The new naming is (to me) much easier to understand. Here is a summary
of the new state of the world:
- '*Threshold' is the threshold for full unrolling. It is measured
against the estimated unrolled cost as computed by getUserCost in TTI
(or CodeMetrics, etc). We will exceed this threshold when unrolling
loops where unrolling exposes a significant degree of simplification
of the logic within the loop.
- '*PercentDynamicCostSavedThreshold' is the percentage of the loop's
estimated dynamic execution cost which needs to be saved by unrolling
to apply a discount to the estimated unrolled cost.
- '*DynamicCostSavingsDiscount' is the discount applied to the estimated
unrolling cost when the dynamic savings are expected to be high.
When actually analyzing the loop, we now produce both an estimated
unrolled cost, and an estimated rolled cost. The rolled cost is notably
a dynamic estimate based on our analysis of the expected execution of
each iteration.
While we're still working to build up the infrastructure for making
these estimates, to me it is much more clear *how* to make them better
when they have reasonably descriptive names. For example, we may want to
apply estimated (from heuristics or profiles) dynamic execution weights
to the *dynamic* cost estimates. If we start doing that, we would also
need to track the static unrolled cost and the dynamic unrolled cost, as
only the latter could reasonably be weighted by profile information.
This patch is sadly not without functionality change for the new unroll
analysis logic. Buried in the heuristic management were several things
that surprised me. For example, we never subtracted the optimized
instruction count off when comparing against the unroll heursistics!
I don't know if this just got lost somewhere along the way or what, but
with the new accounting of things, this is much easier to keep track of
and we use the post-simplification cost estimate to compare to the
thresholds, and use the dynamic cost reduction ratio to select whether
we can exceed the baseline threshold.
The old values of these flags also don't necessarily make sense. My
impression is that none of these thresholds or discounts have been tuned
yet, and so they're just arbitrary placehold numbers. As such, I've not
bothered to adjust for the fact that this is now a discount and not
a tow-tier threshold model. We need to tune all these values once the
logic is ready to be enabled.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9966
llvm-svn: 239164
port it to the new pass manager.
All this does is extract the inner "location" class used by AA into its
own full fledged type. This seems *much* cleaner as MemoryDependence and
soon MemorySSA also use this heavily, and it doesn't make much sense
being inside the AA infrastructure.
This will also make it much easier to break apart the AA infrastructure
into something that stands on its own rather than using the analysis
group design.
There are a few places where this makes APIs not make sense -- they were
taking an AliasAnalysis pointer just to build locations. I'll try to
clean those up in follow-up commits.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10228
llvm-svn: 239003
Philip Reames