...because that's what the cost model was intended to do.
As discussed in D12882, this fix has a temporary unintended consequence for
SimplifyCFG: it causes us to not speculate an fdiv. However, two wrongs make
PR24818 right, and two wrongs make PR24343 act right even though it's really
still wrong.
I intend to correct SimplifyCFG and add to CodeGenPrepare to account for this
cost model change and preserve the righteousness for the bug report cases.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24818https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24343
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12882
llvm-svn: 248439
This reverts isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute's use of ReadNone until we
split ReadNone into two pieces: one attribute which reasons about how
the function reasons about memory and another attribute which determines
how it may be speculated, CSE'd, trap, etc.
llvm-svn: 246331
Any call which is side effect free is trivially OK to speculate. We
already had similar logic in EarlyCSE and GVN but we were missing it
from isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute.
This fixes PR24601.
llvm-svn: 246232
These are named following the IEEE-754 names for these
functions, rather than the libm fmin / fmax to avoid
possible ambiguities. Some languages may implement something
resembling fmin / fmax which return NaN if either operand is
to propagate errors. These implement the IEEE-754 semantics
of returning the other operand if either is a NaN representing
missing data.
llvm-svn: 220341
Sanjay Patel