At the least it should be guarded by some kind of target hook.
It also introduced catastrophic compile time and code quality
regressions on some out of tree targets (test case still being
reduced/sanitized).
Sanjay agreed with reverting this patch until these issues can be
resolved.
llvm-svn: 236199
This is a compromise: with this simple patch, we should always handle a chain of exactly 3
operations optimally, but we're not generating the optimal balanced binary tree for a longer
sequence.
In general, this transform will reduce the dependency chain for a sequence of instructions
using N operands from a worst case N-1 dependent operations to N/2 dependent operations.
The optimal balanced binary tree would reduce the chain to log2(N).
The trade-off for not dealing with longer sequences is: (1) we have less complexity in the
compiler, (2) we avoid unknown compile-time blowup calculating a balanced tree, and (3) we
don't need to worry about the increased register pressure required to parallelize longer
sequences. It also seems unlikely that we would ever encounter really long strings of
dependent ops like that in the wild, but I'm not sure how to verify that speculation.
FWIW, I see no perf difference for test-suite running on btver2 (x86-64) with -ffast-math
and this patch.
We can extend this patch to cover other associative operations such as fmul, fmax, fmin,
integer add, integer mul.
This is a partial fix for:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17305
and if extended:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21768https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23116
The issue also came up in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8941
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9232
llvm-svn: 236031
Owen Anderson