Previously, I was assuming that S_DEFRANGE_SUBFIELD_REGISTERs are always in the
increasing order of offset_in_parent until I saw a counter example.
Using `std::map` so that they are sorted by offset_in_parent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124061
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary:
The DWARFExpression methods have a lot of arguments. This removes two of
them by removing the ability to slice the expression via two offset+size
parameters. This is a functionality that it is not always needed, and
when it is, we already have a different handy way of slicing a data
extractor which we can use instead.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66745
llvm-svn: 370027
Like many of our DWARF classes, the DWARFExpression can be initialized
in several ways. One such way was through a constructor that takes just
the compile unit. This constructor is used to initialize both empty
DWARFExpressions, and DWARFExpression that will be populated later.
To make the distinction more clear, I changed the constructor to a
default constructor and updated its call sites. Where the
DWARFExpression was being populated later, I replaced that with a call
to the copy assignment constructor.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62425
llvm-svn: 361849
Summary:
This is coming from the discussion in D55356 (the most interesting part
happened on the mailing list, so it isn't reflected on the review page).
In short the issue is that lldb assumes that all bytes of a module image
in memory will be backed by a "section". This isn't the case for PECOFF
files because the initial bytes of the module image will contain the
file header, which does not correspond to any normal section in the
file. In particular, this means it is not possible to implement
GetBaseAddress function for PECOFF files, because that's supposed point
to the first byte of that header.
If my (limited) understanding of how PECOFF files work is correct, then
the OS is expecded to load the entire module into one continuous chunk
of memory. The address of that chunk (+/- ASLR) is given by the "image
base" field in the COFF header, and it's size by "image size". All of
the COFF sections are then loaded into this range.
If that's true, then we can model this behavior in lldb by creating a
"container" section to represent the entire module image, and then place
other sections inside that. This would make be consistent with how MachO
and ELF files are modelled (except that those can have multiple
top-level containers as they can be loaded into multiple discontinuous
chunks of memory).
This change required a small number of fixups in the PDB plugins, which
assumed a certain order of sections within the object file (which
obivously changes now). I fix this by changing the lookup code to use
section IDs (which are unchanged) instead of indexes. This has the nice
benefit of removing spurious -1s in the plugins as the section IDs in
the pdbs match the 1-based section IDs in the COFF plugin.
Besides making the implementation of GetBaseAddress possible, this also
improves the lookup of addresses in the gaps between the object file
sections, which will now be correctly resolved as belonging to the
object file.
Reviewers: zturner, amccarth, stella.stamenova, clayborg, lemo
Reviewed By: clayborg, lemo
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56537
llvm-svn: 353916
stored relative to VFRAME
Summary:
This patch makes LLDB able to retrieve proper values for function arguments and
local variables stored in PDB relative to VFRAME register.
Patch contains retrieval of corresponding FPO table entries from PDB and a
generic translator from FPO programs to DWARF expressions to get correct VFRAME
value.
Patch also improves variables-locations.test and makes this test passable on
x86.
Patch By: leonid.mashinsky
Reviewers: zturner, asmith, stella.stamenova, aleksandr.urakov
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: arphaman, labath, mgorny, aprantl, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55122
llvm-svn: 352845
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch adds support for parsing and evaluating local variables.
using the native pdb plugin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55575
llvm-svn: 349067
Zequan Wu