Summary:
The problem:
LSP specifies that Positions are between characters. Therefore when a position
(or an empty range) is used to target elements of the source code, there is an
ambiguity - should we look left or right of the cursor?
Until now, SelectionTree resolved this to the right except in trivial cases
(where there's whitespace, semicolon, or eof on the right).
This meant that it's unable to e.g. out-line `int foo^()` today.
Complicating this, LSP notwithstanding the cursor is *on* a character in many
editors (mostly terminal-based). In these cases there's no ambiguity - we must
"look right" - but there's also no way to tell in LSP.
(Several features currently resolve this by using getBeginningOfIdentifier,
which tries to rewind and supports end-of-identifier. But this relies on
raw lexing and is limited and buggy).
Precedent: well - most other languages aren't so full of densely packed symbols
that we might want to target. Bias-towards-identifier works well enough.
MS C++ for vscode seems to mostly use bias-toward-identifier too.
The problem with this solution is it doesn't provide any way to target some
things such as the constructor call in Foo^(bar());
Presented solution:
When an ambiguous selection is found, we generate *both* possible selection
trees. We try to run the feature on the rightward tree first, and then on the
leftward tree if it fails.
This is basically do-what-I-mean, the main downside is the need to do this on
a feature-by-feature basis (because each feature knows what "fail" means).
The most complicated instance of this is Tweaks, where the preferred selection
may vary tweak-by-tweak.
Wrinkles:
While production behavior is pretty consistent, this introduces some
inconsistency in testing, depending whether the interface we're testing is
inside or outside the "retry" wrapper.
In particular, for many features like Hover, the unit tests will show production
behavior, while for Tweaks the harness would have to run the loop itself if
we want this.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71345
Summary:
This doesn't cover decls in diagnostics, which use NamedDecl::getNameForDiagnostic().
(That should also be fixed later I think).
This covers some cases of https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/76
(hover, but not outline or sighelp)
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70236
Summary:
Otherwise every client dealing with name location should handle
anonymous names in a special manner.
This seems too error-prone, clients can probably handle anonymous
entities they care about differently.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69511
The Windows triple currently turns on delayed template parsing, which
confuses several unit tests that use templates.
For now, just explicitly disable delayed template parsing. This isn't
ideal, but:
- the Windows triple will soon no longer use delayed template parsing
by default
- there's precedent for this in the clangd unit tests already
- let's get the clangd tests pass on Windows first before making
behavioral changes
Part of PR43592.
llvm-svn: 374718
Summary:
This is the first part of an effort to "unbundle" our libIndex use into separate
concerns (AST traversal, token<->node mapping, node<->decl mapping,
decl<->decl relationshipes).
Currently, clangd relies on libIndex to associate tokens, AST nodes, and decls.
This leads to rather convoluted implementations of e.g. hover and
extract-function, which are not naturally thought of as indexing applications.
The idea is that by decoupling different concerns, we make them easier
to use, test, and combine, and more efficient when only one part is needed.
There are some synergies between e.g. traversal and finding
relationships between decls, hopefully the benefits outweight these.
Reviewers: kadircet, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66751
llvm-svn: 370746
Sam McCall