Similar to the ConstantRange::getActiveBits(), and to similarly-named
methods in APInt, returns the bitwidth needed to represent
the given signed constant range
Much like APInt::getActiveBits(), computes how many bits are needed
to be able to represent every value in this constant range,
treating the values as unsigned.
Use the fact that `~X` is equivalent to `-1 - X`, which gives us
fully-precise answer, and we only need to special-handle the wrapped case.
This fires ~16k times for vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed.
A new hidden option -print-changed is added along with code to support
printing the IR as it passes through the opt pipeline in the new pass
manager. Only those passes that change the IR are reported, with others
only having the banner reported, indicating that they did not change the
IR, were filtered out or ignored. Filtering of output via the
-filter-print-funcs is supported and a new supporting hidden option
-filter-passes is added. The latter takes a comma separated list of pass
names and filters the output to only show those passes in the list that
change the IR. The output can also be modified via the -print-module-scope
function.
The code introduces a template base class that generalizes the comparison
of IRs that takes an IR representation as template parameter. The
constructor takes a series of lambdas that provide an event based API
for generalized reporting of IRs as they are changed in the opt pipeline
through the new pass manager.
The first of several instantiations is provided that prints the IR
in a form similar to that produced by -print-after-all with the above
mentioned filtering capabilities. This version, and the others to
follow will be introduced at the upcoming developer's conference.
Reviewed By: aeubanks (Arthur Eubanks), yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban), ychen (Yuanfang Chen)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86360
This patch prevents the `llvm.masked.gather` and `llvm.masked.scatter` intrinsics to be scalarized when invoked on scalable vectors.
The change in `Function.cpp` is needed to prevent the warning that is raised when `getNumElements` is used in place of `getElementCount` on `VectorType` instances. The tests guards for regressions on this change.
The tests makes sure that calls to `llvm.masked.[gather|scatter]` are still scalarized when:
# the intrinsics are operating on fixed size vectors, and
# the compiler is not targeting fixed length SVE code generation.
Reviewed By: efriedma, sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86249
This is needed to support assumed size array of fortran which can have missing upperBound/count
, contrary to current DISubrange support.
Example:
subroutine sub (array1, array2)
integer :: array1 (*)
integer :: array2 (4:9, 10:*)
array1(7:8) = 9
array2(5, 10) = 10
end subroutine
Now the validation check is relaxed for fortran.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87500
We're now getting close to having the necessary analysis/combines etc. for the new generic llvm smax/smin/umax/umin intrinsics.
This patch updates the SSE/AVX integer MINMAX intrinsics to emit the generic equivalents instead of the icmp+select code pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87603
I've amended the isLoadInvariantInLoop function to bail out for
scalable vectors for now since the invariant.start intrinsic is only
ever generated by the clang frontend for thread locals or struct
and class constructors, neither of which support sizeless types.
In addition, the intrinsic itself does not currently support the
concept of a scaled size, which makes it impossible to compare
the sizes of different scalable objects, e.g. <vscale x 32 x i8>
and <vscale x 16 x i8>.
Added new tests here:
Transforms/LICM/AArch64/sve-load-hoist.ll
Transforms/LICM/hoisting.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87227
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch
shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt
assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it
easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use".
As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this
scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the
assumption outlining.
In particular, we shouldn't make assumptions about globals which are
unnamed_addr: we can fold them together with other globals.
Also while I'm here, use isInterposable() instead of trying to
explicitly name all the different kinds of weak linkage.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47090
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87123
A new hidden option -print-changed is added along with code to support
printing the IR as it passes through the opt pipeline in the new pass
manager. Only those passes that change the IR are reported, with others
only having the banner reported, indicating that they did not change the
IR, were filtered out or ignored. Filtering of output via the
-filter-print-funcs is supported and a new supporting hidden option
-filter-passes is added. The latter takes a comma separated list of pass
names and filters the output to only show those passes in the list that
change the IR. The output can also be modified via the -print-module-scope
function.
The code introduces a template base class that generalizes the comparison
of IRs that takes an IR representation as template parameter. The
constructor takes a series of lambdas that provide an event based API
for generalized reporting of IRs as they are changed in the opt pipeline
through the new pass manager.
The first of several instantiations is provided that prints the IR
in a form similar to that produced by -print-after-all with the above
mentioned filtering capabilities. This version, and the others to
follow will be introduced at the upcoming developer's conference.
See https://hotcrp.llvm.org/usllvm2020/paper/29 for more information.
Reviewed By: yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86360
This also changes -lint from an analysis to a pass. It's similar to
-verify, and that is a normal pass, and lives in llvm/IR.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87057
The 1st try was reverted because I missed an assert that
needed softening.
As discussed in D86798 / rG09652721 , we were potentially
returning a different result for whether an Instruction
is commutable depending on if we call the base class or
derived class method.
This requires relaxing asserts in GVN, but that pass
seems to be working otherwise.
NewGVN requires more work because it uses different
code paths for numbering binops and calls.
As discussed in D86798 / rG09652721 , we were potentially
returning a different result for whether an Instruction
is commutable depending on if we call the base class or
derived class method.
This requires relaxing an assert in GVN, but that pass
seems to be working otherwise.
NewGVN requires more work because it uses different
code paths for numbering binops and calls.
The original take was 6102310d81,
which taught InstSimplify to do that, which seemed better at time,
since we got EarlyCSE support for free.
However, it was proven that we can not do that there,
the simplified-to PHI would not be reachable from the original PHI,
and that is not something InstSimplify is allowed to do,
as noted in the commit ed90f15efb
that reverted it :
> It appears to cause compilation non-determinism and caused stage3 mismatches.
However InstCombine already does many different optimizations,
so it should be a safe place to do it here.
Note that we still can't just compare incoming values ranges,
because there is no guarantee that these PHI's we'd simplify to
were already re-visited and sorted.
However coming up with a test is problematic.
Effects on vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed:
```
| statistic name | baseline | proposed | Δ | % | |%| |
|----------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------|-------:|---------:|---------:|
| instcombine.NumPHICSEs | 0 | 22228 | 22228 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| asm-printer.EmittedInsts | 7942329 | 7942456 | 127 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| assembler.ObjectBytes | 254295632 | 254313792 | 18160 | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| early-cse.NumCSE | 2183283 | 2183272 | -11 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| early-cse.NumSimplify | 550105 | 541842 | -8263 | -1.50% | 1.50% |
| instcombine.NumAggregateReconstructionsSimplified | 73 | 4506 | 4433 | 6072.60% | 6072.60% |
| instcombine.NumCombined | 3640311 | 3666911 | 26600 | 0.73% | 0.73% |
| instcombine.NumDeadInst | 1778204 | 1783318 | 5114 | 0.29% | 0.29% |
| instcount.NumCallInst | 1758395 | 1758804 | 409 | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| instcount.NumInvokeInst | 59478 | 59502 | 24 | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| instcount.NumPHIInst | 330557 | 330549 | -8 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| instcount.TotalBlocks | 1077138 | 1077221 | 83 | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| instcount.TotalFuncs | 101442 | 101441 | -1 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| instcount.TotalInsts | 8831946 | 8832611 | 665 | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| simplifycfg.NumInvokes | 4300 | 4410 | 110 | 2.56% | 2.56% |
| simplifycfg.NumSimpl | 1019813 | 999740 | -20073 | -1.97% | 1.97% |
```
So it fires ~22k times, which is less than ~24k the take 1 did.
It allows foldAggregateConstructionIntoAggregateReuse() to actually work
after PHI-of-extractvalue folds did their thing. Previously SimplifyCFG
would have done this PHI CSE, of all places. Additionally, allows some
more `invoke`->`call` folds to happen (+110, +2.56%).
All in all, expectedly, this catches less things overall,
but all the motivational cases are still caught, so all good.
Rather than calling hasFnAttribute and then calling getFnAttribute
if the attribute exists, its better to just call getFnAttribute and
then check if we got a valid attribute back.
There's a special case in hasAttribute for None when pImpl is null. If pImpl is not null we dispatch to pImpl->hasAttribute which will always return false for Attribute::None.
So if we just want to check for None its sufficient to just check that pImpl is null. Which can even be done inline.
This patch adds a helper for that case which I hope will speed up our getSubtargetImpl implementations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86744
This patch fixes this crash https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/Ps8d1e
And gives SROA the ability to remove assumes if it allows promoting an alloca to register
Without removing assumes when it can't promote to register.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86570
This patch changes ElementCount so that the Min and Scalable
members are now private and can only be accessed via the get
functions getKnownMinValue() and isScalable(). In addition I've
added some other member functions for more commonly used operations.
Hopefully this makes the class more useful and will reduce the
need for calling getKnownMinValue().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86065
This patch adjusts the following ARM/AArch64 LLVM IR intrinsics:
- neon_bfmmla
- neon_bfmlalb
- neon_bfmlalt
so that they take and return bf16 and float types. Previously these
intrinsics used <8 x i8> and <4 x i8> vectors (a rudiment from
implementation lacking bf16 IR type).
The neon_vbfdot[q] intrinsics are adjusted similarly. This change
required some additional selection patterns for vbfdot itself and
also for vector shuffles (in a previous patch) because of SelectionDAG
transformations kicking in and mangling the original code.
This patch makes the generated IR cleaner (less useless bitcasts are
produced), but it does not affect the final assembly.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86146
Apparently, we don't do this, neither in EarlyCSE, nor in InstSimplify,
nor in (old) GVN, but do in NewGVN and SimplifyCFG of all places..
While i could teach EarlyCSE how to hash PHI nodes,
we can't really do much (anything?) even if we find two identical
PHI nodes in different basic blocks, same-BB case is the interesting one,
and if we teach InstSimplify about it (which is what i wanted originally,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86530), we get EarlyCSE support for free.
So i would think this is pretty uncontroversial.
On vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed, this has the following effects:
```
| statistic name | baseline | proposed | Δ | % | \|%\| |
|----------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------|-------:|---------:|---------:|
| instsimplify.NumPHICSE | 0 | 23779 | 23779 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| asm-printer.EmittedInsts | 7942328 | 7942392 | 64 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| assembler.ObjectBytes | 273069192 | 273084704 | 15512 | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| correlated-value-propagation.NumPhis | 18412 | 18539 | 127 | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| early-cse.NumCSE | 2183283 | 2183227 | -56 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| early-cse.NumSimplify | 550105 | 542090 | -8015 | -1.46% | 1.46% |
| instcombine.NumAggregateReconstructionsSimplified | 73 | 4506 | 4433 | 6072.60% | 6072.60% |
| instcombine.NumCombined | 3640264 | 3664769 | 24505 | 0.67% | 0.67% |
| instcombine.NumDeadInst | 1778193 | 1783183 | 4990 | 0.28% | 0.28% |
| instcount.NumCallInst | 1758401 | 1758799 | 398 | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| instcount.NumInvokeInst | 59478 | 59502 | 24 | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| instcount.NumPHIInst | 330557 | 330533 | -24 | -0.01% | 0.01% |
| instcount.TotalInsts | 8831952 | 8832286 | 334 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| simplifycfg.NumInvokes | 4300 | 4410 | 110 | 2.56% | 2.56% |
| simplifycfg.NumSimpl | 1019808 | 999607 | -20201 | -1.98% | 1.98% |
```
I.e. it fires ~24k times, causes +110 (+2.56%) more `invoke` -> `call`
transforms, and counter-intuitively results in *more* instructions total.
That being said, the PHI count doesn't decrease that much,
and looking at some examples, it seems at least some of them
were previously getting PHI CSE'd in SimplifyCFG of all places..
I'm adjusting `Instruction::isIdenticalToWhenDefined()` at the same time.
As a comment in `InstCombinerImpl::visitPHINode()` already stated,
there are no guarantees on the ordering of the operands of a PHI node,
so if we just naively compare them, we may false-negatively say that
the nodes are not equal when the only difference is operand order,
which is especially important since the fold is in InstSimplify,
so we can't rely on InstCombine sorting them beforehand.
Fixing this for the general case is costly (geomean +0.02%),
and does not appear to catch anything in test-suite, but for
the same-BB case, it's trivial, so let's fix at least that.
As per http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=04879086b44348cad600a0a1ccbe1f7776cc3cf9&to=82bdedb888b945df1e9f130dd3ac4dd3c96e2925&stat=instructions
this appears to cause geomean +0.03% compile time increase (regression),
but geomean -0.01%..-0.04% code size decrease (improvement).
This reverts commit 8d5f64c4ed.
Thanks to Eli Friedma for pointing out that this check is not appropiate here,
this check will be moved to the Lint pass.
As FIXME said, they really should be checking for a single user,
not use, so let's do that. It is not *that* unusual to have
the same value as incoming value in a PHI node, not unlike
how a PHI may have the same incoming basic block more than once.
There isn't a nice way to do that, Value::users() isn't uniqified,
and Value only tracks it's uses, not Users, so the check is
potentially costly since it does indeed potentially involes
traversing the entire use list of a value.
This adapts the verifier checks for intrinsic get.active.lane.mask to the new
semantics of it as described in D86147. I.e., the second argument %n, which
corresponds to the loop tripcount, must be greater than 0 if it is a constant,
so check that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86301
Changes:
* Change `ToVectorTy` to deal directly with `ElementCount` instances.
* `VF == 1` replaced with `VF.isScalar()`.
* `VF > 1` and `VF >=2` replaced with `VF.isVector()`.
* `VF <=1` is replaced with `VF.isZero() || VF.isScalar()`.
* Replaced the uses of `llvm::SmallSet<ElementCount, ...>` with
`llvm::SmallSetVector<ElementCount, ...>`. This avoids the need of an
ordering function for the `ElementCount` class.
* Bits and pieces around printing the `ElementCount` to string streams.
To guarantee that this change is a NFC, `VF.Min` and asserts are used
in the following places:
1. When it doesn't make sense to deal with the scalable property, for
example:
a. When computing unrolling factors.
b. When shuffle masks are built for fixed width vector types
In this cases, an
assert(!VF.Scalable && "<mgs>") has been added to make sure we don't
enter coepaths that don't make sense for scalable vectors.
2. When there is a conscious decision to use `FixedVectorType`. These
uses of `FixedVectorType` will likely be removed in favour of
`VectorType` once the vectorizer is generic enough to deal with both
fixed vector types and scalable vector types.
3. When dealing with building constants out of the value of VF, for
example when computing the vectorization `step`, or building vectors
of indices. These operation _make sense_ for scalable vectors too,
but changing the code in these places to be generic and make it work
for scalable vectors is to be submitted in a separate patch, as it is
a functional change.
4. When building the potential VFs in VPlan. Making the VPlan generic
enough to handle scalable vectorization factors is a functional change
that needs a separate patch. See for example `void
LoopVectorizationPlanner::buildVPlans(unsigned MinVF, unsigned
MaxVF)`.
5. The class `IntrinsicCostAttribute`: this class still uses `unsigned
VF` as updating the field to use `ElementCount` woudl require changes
that could result in changing the behavior of the compiler. Will be done
in a separate patch.
7. When dealing with user input for forcing the vectorization
factor. In this case, adding support for scalable vectorization is a
functional change that migh require changes at command line.
Note that in some places the idiom
```
unsigned VF = ...
auto VTy = FixedVectorType::get(ScalarTy, VF)
```
has been replaced with
```
ElementCount VF = ...
assert(!VF.Scalable && ...);
auto VTy = VectorType::get(ScalarTy, VF)
```
The assertion guarantees that the new code is (at least in debug mode)
functionally equivalent to the old version. Notice that this change had been
possible because none of the methods that are specific to `FixedVectorType`
were used after the instantiation of `VTy`.
Reviewed By: rengolin, ctetreau
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85794
Changes:
* Change `ToVectorTy` to deal directly with `ElementCount` instances.
* `VF == 1` replaced with `VF.isScalar()`.
* `VF > 1` and `VF >=2` replaced with `VF.isVector()`.
* `VF <=1` is replaced with `VF.isZero() || VF.isScalar()`.
* Add `<` operator to `ElementCount` to be able to use
`llvm::SmallSetVector<ElementCount, ...>`.
* Bits and pieces around printing the ElementCount to string streams.
* Added a static method to `ElementCount` to represent a scalar.
To guarantee that this change is a NFC, `VF.Min` and asserts are used
in the following places:
1. When it doesn't make sense to deal with the scalable property, for
example:
a. When computing unrolling factors.
b. When shuffle masks are built for fixed width vector types
In this cases, an
assert(!VF.Scalable && "<mgs>") has been added to make sure we don't
enter coepaths that don't make sense for scalable vectors.
2. When there is a conscious decision to use `FixedVectorType`. These
uses of `FixedVectorType` will likely be removed in favour of
`VectorType` once the vectorizer is generic enough to deal with both
fixed vector types and scalable vector types.
3. When dealing with building constants out of the value of VF, for
example when computing the vectorization `step`, or building vectors
of indices. These operation _make sense_ for scalable vectors too,
but changing the code in these places to be generic and make it work
for scalable vectors is to be submitted in a separate patch, as it is
a functional change.
4. When building the potential VFs in VPlan. Making the VPlan generic
enough to handle scalable vectorization factors is a functional change
that needs a separate patch. See for example `void
LoopVectorizationPlanner::buildVPlans(unsigned MinVF, unsigned
MaxVF)`.
5. The class `IntrinsicCostAttribute`: this class still uses `unsigned
VF` as updating the field to use `ElementCount` woudl require changes
that could result in changing the behavior of the compiler. Will be done
in a separate patch.
7. When dealing with user input for forcing the vectorization
factor. In this case, adding support for scalable vectorization is a
functional change that migh require changes at command line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85794
This patch adds support for representing Fortran `character(n)`.
Primarily patch is based out of D54114 with appropriate modifications.
Test case IR is generated using our downstream classic-flang. We're in process
of upstreaming flang PR's but classic-flang has dependencies on llvm, so
this has to get in first.
Patch includes functional test case for both IR and corresponding
dwarf, furthermore it has been manually tested as well using GDB.
Source snippet:
```
program assumedLength
call sub('Hello')
call sub('Goodbye')
contains
subroutine sub(string)
implicit none
character(len=*), intent(in) :: string
print *, string
end subroutine sub
end program assumedLength
```
GDB:
```
(gdb) ptype string
type = character (5)
(gdb) p string
$1 = 'Hello'
```
Reviewed By: aprantl, schweitz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86305
Extend the `applyUpdates` in DominatorTree to allow a post CFG view,
different from the current CFG.
This patch implements the functionality of updating an already up to
date DT, to the desired PostCFGView.
Combining a set of updates towards an up to date DT and a PostCFGView is
not yet supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85472
If some of gc live value are not used in gc.relocate we can remove them
from gc-live bundle of statepoint instruction.
Also the CL removes duplicated Values in gc-live bundle.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: dantrushin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85959
Currently ConstantExpr::getWithOperands does not handle FNeg and
subsequently treats FNeg as binary operator, leading to an assertion
failure or segmentation fault if built without assertions.
Originally I reproduced this with llvm-dis on a bitcode file, which I
unfortunately cannot share and also cannot really reduce.
But PR45426 describes the same issue and has a reproducer with Clang, so
I'll go with that.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86274
Both AfterPass and AfterPassInvalidated pass instrumentation
callbacks get additional parameter of type PreservedAnalyses.
This patch was created by @fedor.sergeev. I have just slightly
changed it.
Reviewers: fedor.sergeev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81555
We don't need a std::string for a literal string, we can use a
StringRef.
The addition of StringRefs produces a Twine that we can just call
str() without converting to a SmallString ourselves. Twine will
do that internally.
Roman Lebedev