All these tests already explicitly test against both legacy PM and NPM.
$ sed -i 's/ -attributor / -attributor -enable-new-pm=0 /g' $(rg --path-separator // -l -- -passes=)
$ sed -i 's/ -attributor-cgscc / -attributor-cgscc -enable-new-pm=0 /g' $(rg --path-separator // -l -- -passes=)
Now all tests in Transforms/Attributor/ pass under NPM.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84813
Summary:
All tests are updated, except wrapper.ll since it is not working nicely
with newly created functions.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, uenoku, baziotis, homerdin
Subscribers: arphaman, jfb, kuter, bbn, okura, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84130
For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the
datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR
later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the
datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default
datalayout.
The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow
overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this,
some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target.
Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new
machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the
datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information
from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools
to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time.
Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback.
(clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at
least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a
datalayout is not something frontends should generate.
This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen
regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with
a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the
overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the
default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one
AMDGPU test.
Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just
fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
We now use getPointerDereferenceableBytes to determine `nonnull` and
`dereferenceable` facts from the IR. We also use getPointerAlignment in
AAAlign for the same reason. The latter can interfere with callbacks so
we do restrict it to non-function-pointers for now.
Before we eagerly put dependences into the QueryMap as soon as we
encountered them (via `Attributor::getAAFor<>` or
`Attributor::recordDependence`). Now we will wait to see if the
dependence is useful, that is if the target is not already in a fixpoint
state at the end of the update. If so, there is no need to record the
dependence at all.
Due to the abstraction via `Attributor::updateAA` we will now also treat
the very first update (during attribute creation) as we do subsequent
updates.
Finally this resolves the problematic usage of QueriedNonFixAA.
---
Single run of the Attributor module and then CGSCC pass (oldPM)
for SPASS/clause.c (~10k LLVM-IR loc):
Before:
```
calls to allocation functions: 554675 (389245/s)
temporary memory allocations: 101574 (71280/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 28.46MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 116.26MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```
After:
```
calls to allocation functions: 512465 (345559/s)
temporary memory allocations: 98832 (66643/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 22.54MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 106.58MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```
Difference:
```
calls to allocation functions: -42210 (-727758/s)
temporary memory allocations: -2742 (-47275/s)
peak heap memory consumption: -5.92MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B
```
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
Query AAValueSimplify on pointers in memory accessing instructions to take
advantage of the constant propagation (or any other value simplification) of such values.
We used coarse-grained liveness before, thus we looked if the
instruction was executed, but we did not use fine-grained liveness,
hence if the instruction was needed or could be deleted even if the
surrounding ones are live. This patches introduces this level of
liveness checks together with other liveness queries, e.g., for uses.
For more control we enforce that all liveness queries go through the
Attributor.
Test have been adjusted to reflect the changes or augmented to prevent
deletion of the parts we want to check.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73313
As part of the Attributor manifest we want to change the signature of
functions. This patch introduces a fairly generic interface to do so.
As a first, very simple, use case, we remove unused arguments. A second
use case, pointer privatization, will be committed with this patch as
well.
A lot of the code and ideas are taken from argument promotion and we
run all argument promotion tests through this framework as well.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68765
Especially for callbacks, annotating the call site arguments is
important. Doing so exposed a too strong dependence of AAMemoryBehavior
on AANoCapture since we handle the case of potentially captured pointers
explicitly.
The changes to the tests are all mechanical.
Summary: This patch makes `AAValueSimplify` use `changeUsesAfterManifest` in `manifest`. This will invoke simple folding after the manifest.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71972
sstefan1