Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Vedant Kumar 8359511c62 [CodeExtractor] Remove stale llvm.assume calls from extracted region
During extraction, stale llvm.assume handles may be retained in the
original function. The setup is:

1) CodeExtractor unregisters assumptions in the blocks that are to be
   extracted.

2) Extraction happens. There are now two functions: f1 and f1.extracted.

3) Leftover assumptions in f1 (/not/ removed as they were not in the set of
   blocks to be extracted) now have affected-value llvm.assume handles in
   f1.extracted.

When assumptions for a value used in f1 are looked up, ValueTracking can assert
as some of the handles are in the wrong function. To fix this, simply erase the
llvm.assume calls in the extracted function.

Alternatives include flushing the assumption cache in the original function, or
walking all values used in the original function to prune stale affected-value
handles. Both seem more expensive.

Testing: check-llvm, LNT run with -mllvm -hot-cold-split enabled

rdar://58460728
2020-01-28 17:18:01 -08:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Sergey Dmitriev 807960e6ef [CodeExtractor] Update function's assumption cache after extracting blocks from it
Summary: Assumption cache's self-updating mechanism does not correctly handle the case when blocks are extracted from the function by the CodeExtractor. As a result function's assumption cache may have stale references to the llvm.assume calls that were moved to the outlined function. This patch fixes this problem by removing extracted llvm.assume calls from the function’s assumption cache.

Reviewers: hfinkel, vsk, fhahn, davidxl, sanjoy

Reviewed By: hfinkel, vsk

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57215

llvm-svn: 353500
2019-02-08 06:55:18 +00:00