Summary:
This patch allows threads not created using `std::thread` to use `std::notify_all_at_thread_exit` by ensuring the TL state has been initialized within `std::notify_all_at_thread_exit`.
Additionally this patch "fixes" a potential oddity in `__thread_local_pointer::reset(pointer)`, which would previously delete the old thread local data. However there should *never* be old thread local data because pthread *should* null it out on thread exit. Unfortunately it's possible that pthread failed to do this according to the spec:
>
> Upon key creation, the value NULL shall be associated with the new key in all active threads. Upon thread creation, the value NULL shall be associated with all defined keys in the new thread.
>
> An optional destructor function may be associated with each key value. At thread exit, if a key value has a non-NULL destructor pointer, and the thread has a non-NULL value associated with that key, the value of the key is set to NULL, and then the function pointed to is called with the previously associated value as its sole argument. The order of destructor calls is unspecified if more than one destructor exists for a thread when it exits.
>
> If, after all the destructors have been called for all non-NULL values with associated destructors, there are still some non-NULL values with associated destructors, then the process is repeated. If, after at least {PTHREAD_DESTRUCTOR_ITERATIONS} iterations of destructor calls for outstanding non-NULL values, there are still some non-NULL values with associated destructors, implementations may stop calling destructors, or they may continue calling destructors until no non-NULL values with associated destructors exist, even though this might result in an infinite loop.
However if pthread fails to delete the value it is probably incorrect for us to do it. Destroying the value performs all of the "at thread exit" actions registered with it but we are way past "at thread exit".
Reviewers: mclow.lists, bcraig, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24159
llvm-svn: 280588
Some of the mutex tests fail on machines with high load. This patch implements
the test directive "// FLAKY_TEST" which allows a test to be run 3 times
before it's considered a failure.
llvm-svn: 280050
Summary:
This patch implements the variadic `lock_guard` paper.
Making `lock_guard` variadic is a ABI breaking change because the specialization `lock_guard<_Mutex>` mangles differently then when it was the primary template. This change only provides variadic `lock_guard` in ABI V2 or when `_LIBCPP_ABI_VARIADIC_LOCK_GUARD` is defined.
Note that in ABI V2 `lock_guard` must always be declared as a variadic template, even in C++03, in order to keep the ABI consistent. For this reason `lock_guard` is forward declared as a variadic template in all standard dialects and therefore depends on variadic templates being provided as an extension in C++03. All supported versions of Clang and GCC provide this extension.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: K-ballo, mclow.lists, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21260
llvm-svn: 272634
This patch addresses the following issues in the test suite:
1. Move "std::bad_array_length" test from std/ to libcxx/ test directory
since the feature is not a part of the standard.
2. Rename "futures.tas" test directory to "futures.task" since that is the
correct stable name.
3. Move tests for "packaged_task<T>::result_type" from std/ to libcxx/
test directory since the typedef is a libc++ extension.
llvm-svn: 271430
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
// Do test.
#else
// Empty test.
#endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.
Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730
llvm-svn: 271108
This patch does the following:
* Remove <__config> includes from some container tests.
* Guards uses of std::launch::any in async tests because it's an extension.
* Move "test/std/extensions" to "test/libcxx/extensions"
* Moves various non-standard tests including those in "sequences/vector",
"std/localization" and "utilities/meta".
llvm-svn: 267981
Summary:
Hi,
When creating a new thread libc++ performs at least 2 allocations. The first allocates a tuple of args and the functor that will be passed to the new thread. The second allocation is for the thread local storage needed internally by libc++. Currently the second allocation happens in the child thread, meaning that if it throws the program will terminate with an uncaught bad alloc.
The solution to this is to allocate ALL memory in the parent thread and then pass it to the child.
See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15638
Reviewers: mclow.lists, danalbert, jroelofs, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13748
llvm-svn: 266851
Fixes a small omission in libcxx that prevents libcxx being built when
-DLIBCXX_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS=0 is specified.
This patch adds XFAILS to all those tests that are currently failing
on the new -fno-exceptions library variant. Follow-up patches will
update the tests (progressively) to cope with the new library variant.
Change-Id: I4b801bd8d8e4fe7193df9e55f39f1f393a8ba81a
llvm-svn: 252598
After months of work there are only 4 tests still failing in C++03.
This patch fixes those tests.
All of the libc++ builders should be green.
llvm-svn: 246275
Summary:
This patch marks *most* tests for `std::promise`, `std::future` and `std::shared_future` as unsupported in C++03. These tests fail in C++03 mode because they attempt to copy a `std::future` even though it is a `MoveOnly` type. AFAIK the missing move-semantics in `std::future` is the only reason these tests fail but without move semantics these classes are useless. For example even though `std::promise::set_value` and `std::promise::set_exception(...)` work in C++03 `std::promise` is still useless because we cannot call `std::promise::get_future(...)`.
It might be possible to hack `std::move(...)` like we do for `std::unique_ptr` to make the move semantics work but I don't think it is worth the effort. Instead I think we should leave the `<future>` header as-is and mark the failing tests as `UNSUPPORTED`. I don't believe there are any users of `std::future` or `std::promise` in C++03 because they are so unusable. Therefore I am not concerned about losing test coverage and possibly breaking users. However because there are still parts of `<future>` that work in C++03 it would be wrong to `#ifdef` out the entire header.
@mclow.lists Should we take further steps to prevent the use of `std::promise`, `std::future` and `std::shared_future` in C++03?
Note: This patch also cleans up the tests and converts them to use `support/test_allocator.h` instead of a duplicate class in `test/std/futures/test_allocator.h`.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: vsk, mclow.lists, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12135
llvm-svn: 246271
First I removed all of the uses of _LIBCPP_STD_VER and added LIT UNSUPPORTED tags to prevent the tests from being run in older standard dialects.
Second I increased the time tolerances used in some tests when testing with Thread Sanitizer because thread sanitizer make these tests take longer.
llvm-svn: 245793
Because <atomic> can now be used in C++03 there is no need for the test_atomic.h header.
This commit removes the header and converts all usages to use <atomic> instead.
llvm-svn: 245468
std::packaged_task requires variadic templates and is #ifdef out in C++03.
This patch silences the tests in C++03. This patch also rewrites the .fail.cpp tests so that they use clang verify.
llvm-svn: 245413
Summary:
This patch attempts to fix the last 3 TSAN failures on the libc++ bot (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-tsan/builds/143). This patch also adds a `Atomic` test type that can be used where `<atomic>` cannot.
`wait.exception.pass.cpp` and `wait_for.exception.pass.cpp` were failing because the test replaced `std::terminate` with `std::exit`. `std::exit` would asynchronously run the TLS and static destructors and this would cause a race condition. See PR22606 and D8802 for more details.
This is fixed by using `_Exit` to prevent cleanup.
`notify_all_at_thread_exit.pass.cpp` exercises the same race condition but for different reasons. I fixed this test by manually joining the thread before beginning program termination.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11046
llvm-svn: 245389
This patch fixes LWG issue 2422 by removing the DECAY_COPY from call once.
The review can be found here: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10191
llvm-svn: 239654
Within the shared state methods do not unlock the lock guards manually. This
could cause a race condition where the shared state is destroyed before the
method is complete.
llvm-svn: 239577
The test class 'G' reads and writes to the same static variables in its
constructor, destructor and call operator. When threads are
constructed using `std::thread t((G()))` there is a race condition between the
destruction of the temporary and the execution of `G::operator()()`.
The fix is to simply create the input before creating the thread.
llvm-svn: 233946
Summary:
The summary of the bug, provided by Stephan T. Lavavej:
In shared_timed_mutex::try_lock_until() (line 195 in 3.6.0), you need to deliver a notification. The scenario is:
* There are N threads holding the shared lock.
* One thread calls try_lock_until() to attempt to acquire the exclusive lock. It sets the "I want to write" bool/bit, then waits for the N readers to drain away.
* K more threads attempt to acquire the shared lock, but they notice that someone said "I want to write", so they block on a condition_variable.
* At least one of the N readers is stubborn and doesn't release the shared lock.
* The wannabe-writer times out, gives up, and unsets the "I want to write" bool/bit.
At this point, a notification (it needs to be notify_all) must be delivered to the condition_variable that the K wannabe-readers are waiting on. Otherwise, they can block forever without waking up.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, jyasskin
Reviewed By: jyasskin
Subscribers: jyasskin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8796
llvm-svn: 233944
Summary:
Hello Howard,
While running the libc++ tests on our ARM boards, we encounter sporadic failures of the two tests:
test/std/thread/futures/futures.shared_future/wait_until.pass.cpp
test/std/thread/futures/futures.unique_future/wait_until.pass.cpp
The worker thread might not finish yet when the main thread checks its result.
I filed the bug 21998 for this case: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21998
Would you be able to review this please?
Thank you.
Oleg
Reviewers: howard.hinnant, mclow.lists, danalbert, jroelofs, EricWF
Reviewed By: jroelofs, EricWF
Subscribers: EricWF, mclow.lists, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6750
llvm-svn: 228783
Eric Fiselier