This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
Make the stack alignment register (AP) reserved in the given function. This
will make it available everywhere in the function, and allow aligned access
to vector register spill slots.
Some cl::ZeroOrMore were added to avoid the `may only occur zero or one times!`
error. More were added due to cargo cult. Since the error has been removed,
cl::ZeroOrMore is unneeded.
Also remove cl::init(false) while touching the lines.
Since this method can apply to cmpxchg operations, make sure it's clear
what value we're actually retrieving. This will help ensure we don't
accidentally ignore the failure ordering of cmpxchg in the future.
We could potentially introduce a getOrdering() method on AtomicSDNode
that asserts the operation isn't cmpxchg, but not sure that's
worthwhile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103338
Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false.
This means that the behavior of needsStackRealignment does not correspond to
it's name and description; a function might need stack realignment, but if it
is not possible then this function returns false. Furthermore,
needsStackRealignment is not virtual and therefore some backends have made use
of canRealignStack to indicate whether a function needs stack realignment.
This patch attempts to clarify the situation by separating them and introducing
new names:
- shouldRealignStack - true if there is any reason the stack should be
realigned
- canRealignStack - true if we are still able to realign the stack (e.g. we
can still reserve/have reserved a frame pointer)
- hasStackRealignment = shouldRealignStack && canRealignStack (not target
customisable)
Targets can now override shouldRealignStack to indicate that stack realignment
is required.
This change will make it easier in a future change to handle the case where we
need to realign the stack but can't do so (for example when the register
allocator creates an aligned spill after the frame pointer has been
eliminated).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98716
Change-Id: Ib9a4d21728bf9d08a545b4365418d3ffe1af4d87
To accommodate frame layouts that have both fixed and scalable objects
on the stack, describing a stack location or offset using a pointer + uint64_t
is not sufficient. For this reason, we've introduced the StackOffset class,
which models both the fixed- and scalable sized offsets.
The TargetFrameLowering::getFrameIndexReference is made to return a StackOffset,
so that this can be used in other interfaces, such as to eliminate frame indices
in PEI or to emit Debug locations for variables on the stack.
This patch is purely mechanical and doesn't change the behaviour of how
the result of this function is used for fixed-sized offsets. The patch adds
various checks to assert that the offset has no scalable component, as frame
offsets with a scalable component are not yet supported in various places.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90018
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76348
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72701
The patch adds a new option ABI for Hexagon. It primary deals with
the way variable arguments are passed and is use in the Hexagon Linux Musl
environment.
If a callee function has a variable argument list, it must perform the
following operations to set up its function prologue:
1. Determine the number of registers which could have been used for passing
unnamed arguments. This can be calculated by counting the number of
registers used for passing named arguments. For example, if the callee
function is as follows:
int foo(int a, ...){ ... }
... then register R0 is used to access the argument ' a '. The registers
available for passing unnamed arguments are R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5.
2. Determine the number and size of the named arguments on the stack.
3. If the callee has named arguments on the stack, it should copy all of these
arguments to a location below the current position on the stack, and the
difference should be the size of the register-saved area plus padding
(if any is necessary).
The register-saved area constitutes all the registers that could have
been used to pass unnamed arguments. If the number of registers forming
the register-saved area is odd, it requires 4 bytes of padding; if the
number is even, no padding is required. This is done to ensure an 8-byte
alignment on the stack. For example, if the callee is as follows:
int foo(int a, ...){ ... }
... then the named arguments should be copied to the following location:
current_position - 5 (for R1-R5) * 4 (bytes) - 4 (bytes of padding)
If the callee is as follows:
int foo(int a, int b, ...){ ... }
... then the named arguments should be copied to the following location:
current_position - 4 (for R2-R5) * 4 (bytes) - 0 (bytes of padding)
4. After any named arguments have been copied, copy all the registers that
could have been used to pass unnamed arguments on the stack. If the number
of registers is odd, leave 4 bytes of padding and then start copying them
on the stack; if the number is even, no padding is required. This
constitutes the register-saved area. If padding is required, ensure
that the start location of padding is 8-byte aligned. If no padding is
required, ensure that the start location of the on-stack copy of the
first register which might have a variable argument is 8-byte aligned.
5. Decrement the stack pointer by the size of register saved area plus the
padding. For example, if the callee is as follows:
int foo(int a, ...){ ... } ;
... then the decrement value should be the following:
5 (for R1-R5) * 4 (bytes) + 4 (bytes of padding) = 24 bytes
The decrement should be performed before the allocframe instruction.
Increment the stack-pointer back by the same amount before returning
from the function.
1. Add pseudos PS_vloadrv_ai and PS_vstorerv_ai: those are now used
for single vector registers in loadRegFromStackSlot (and store...).
2. Remove pseudos PS_vloadrwu_ai and PS_vstorerwu_ai. The alignment is
now checked when expanding spill pseudos (both in frame lowering
and in expand-post-ra-pseudos), and a proper instruction is generated.
3. Update MachineMemOperands when dealigning vector spill slots.
4. Return vector predicate registers in getCallerSavedRegs.
This adds a flag to LLVM and clang to always generate a .debug_frame
section, even if other debug information is not being generated. In
situations where .eh_frame would normally be emitted, both .debug_frame
and .eh_frame will be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67216
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
Create method `optForNone()` testing for the function level equivalent of
`-O0` and refactor appropriately.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59852
llvm-svn: 357638
As requested during review of D57601, be equally conservative for atomic MMOs as for volatile MMOs in all in tree backends. At the moment, all atomic MMOs are also volatile, but I'm about to change that.
Reviewed as part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D58490, with other backends still pending review.
llvm-svn: 354740
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Eliminate the stack frame in functions with the noreturn nounwind
attributes, and when the noreturn-stack-elim target feature is
enabled. This reduces the code and stack space needed for noreturn
functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54210
llvm-svn: 346532
Change the type in a couple of lists and sets that only store physical
registers from unsigned to MCPhysRegs. The later is only 16bits and
saves us a bit of memory.
llvm-svn: 346254
Kazu Hirata