Assertion failed: (Start.isValid() == End.isValid() && "Start and end should
either both be valid or both be invalid!")
when parsing inline asm. SMLoc assumes that the first char * in the source is
invalid. However, when parsing an inline asm the mnemonic is at this location.
I don't want to change SMLoc, so use a trivial workaround.
llvm-svn: 162381
this is the index of the operand that failed to match.
Note: This may cause a buildbot failure due to an API mismatch in clang. Should
recover with my next commit to clang.
llvm-svn: 162295
This new API will be used by clang to parse ms-style inline asms.
One goal of this project is to use this style of inline asm for targets other
then x86. Therefore, this API needs to be implemented for non-x86 targets at
some point in the future.
llvm-svn: 161624
rdar://10873652
As part of this I updated the llvm-mc disassembler C API to always call the
SymbolLookUp call back even if there is no getOpInfo call back. If there is a
getOpInfo call back that is tried first and then if that gets no information
then the SymbolLookUp is called. I also made the code more robust by
memset(3)'ing to zero the LLVMOpInfo1 struct before then setting
SymbolicOp.Value before for the call to getOpInfo. And also don't use any
values from the LLVMOpInfo1 struct if getOpInfo returns 0. And also don't
use any of the ReferenceType or ReferenceName values from SymbolLookUp if it
returns NULL. rdar://10873563 and rdar://10873683
For the X86 target also fixed bugs so the annotations get printed.
Also fixed a few places in the ARM target that was not producing symbolic
operands for some instructions. rdar://10878166
llvm-svn: 151267
In att style asm syntax memory operand size is derived from suffix attached with mnemonic. In intel style asm syntax it is part of memory operand hence predicate method check is required to select appropriate instruction.
llvm-svn: 148006
the X86 asmparser to produce ranges in the one case that was annoying me, for example:
test.s:10:15: error: invalid operand for instruction
movl 0(%rax), 0(%edx)
^~~~~~~
It should be straight-forward to enhance filecheck, tblgen, and/or the .ll parser to use
ranges where appropriate if someone is interested.
llvm-svn: 142106
Allow a target assembly parser to do context sensitive constraint checking
on a potential instruction match. This will be used, for example, to handle
Thumb2 IT block parsing.
llvm-svn: 137675
This can happen in cases where TableGen generated asm matcher cannot check
whether a register operand is in the right register class. e.g. mem operands.
rdar://8204588
llvm-svn: 136292
llvm-mc gives an "invalid operand" error for instructions that take an unsigned
immediate which have the high bit set such as:
pblendw $0xc5, %xmm2, %xmm1
llvm-mc treats all x86 immediates as signed values and range checks them.
A small number of x86 instructions use the imm8 field as a set of bits.
This change only changes those instructions and where the high bit is not
ignored. The others remain unchanged.
llvm-svn: 136287
Chad Rosier