Enable enableMultipleCopyHints() on X86.
Original Patch by @jonpa:
While enabling the mischeduler for SystemZ, it was discovered that for some reason a test needed one extra seemingly needless COPY (test/CodeGen/SystemZ/call-03.ll). The handling for that is resulted in this patch, which improves the register coalescing by providing not just one copy hint, but a sorted list of copy hints. On SystemZ, this gives ~12500 less register moves on SPEC, as well as marginally less spilling.
Instead of improving just the SystemZ backend, the improvement has been implemented in common-code (calculateSpillWeightAndHint(). This gives a lot of test failures, but since this should be a general improvement I hope that the involved targets will help and review the test updates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38128
llvm-svn: 342578
We now emit a move of -1 before the cmov and do the addition after the cmov just like the case with an extra addition.
This may be slightly worse for code size, but is more consistent with other compilers. And we might be able to hoist the mov -1 outside of loops.
llvm-svn: 338613
Summary:
These changes cover the PR#31399.
Now the ffs(x) function is lowered to (x != 0) ? llvm.cttz(x) + 1 : 0
and it corresponds to the following llvm code:
%cnt = tail call i32 @llvm.cttz.i32(i32 %v, i1 true)
%tobool = icmp eq i32 %v, 0
%.op = add nuw nsw i32 %cnt, 1
%add = select i1 %tobool, i32 0, i32 %.op
and x86 asm code:
bsfl %edi, %ecx
addl $1, %ecx
testl %edi, %edi
movl $0, %eax
cmovnel %ecx, %eax
In this case the 'test' instruction can't be eliminated because
the 'add' instruction modifies the EFLAGS, namely, ZF flag
that is set by the 'bsf' instruction when 'x' is zero.
We now produce the following code:
bsfl %edi, %ecx
movl $-1, %eax
cmovnel %ecx, %eax
addl $1, %eax
Patch by Ivan Kulagin
Reviewers: davide, craig.topper, spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48765
llvm-svn: 336768
Summary:
Same idea as D48529, but restricted to X86 and done very late to avoid any surprises where subtract might be better for DAG combining.
This seems like the safest way to do this trick. And we consider doing it as a DAG combine later.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48557
llvm-svn: 335575
Allowed folding for "and/or" binops with non-constant operand if
arguments of select are 0/-1 values.
Normally this code with "and" opcode does not get to a DAG combiner
and simplified yet in the InstCombine. However AMDGPU produces it
during lowering and InstCombine has no chance to optimize it out.
In turn the same pattern with "or" opcode can reach DAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48301
llvm-svn: 335250
Previously this folding was done only if select is a first operand.
However, for non-commutative operations constant may go before
select.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48223
llvm-svn: 335167
Simon Pilgrim