Fixes this bug: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24504
TokenAnnotator::spaceRequiredBetween was handling TT_ForEachMacro but
not TT_ObjCForIn, so lines that look like:
for (id nextObject in (NSArray *)myArray)
would incorrectly turn into:
for (id nextObject in(NSArray *)myArray)
Patch by Kent Sutherland, thank you.
llvm-svn: 249553
control the individual braces. The existing choices for brace wrapping
are now merely presets for the different flags that get expanded upon
calling the reformat function.
All presets have been chose to keep the existing formatting, so there
shouldn't be any difference in formatting behavior.
Also change the dump_format_style.py to properly document the nested
structs that are used to keep these flags discoverable among all the
configuration flags.
llvm-svn: 248802
JavaScript allows keywords to appear in IdenfierName positions, e.g.
fields, or object literal members, but not as plain identifiers.
Patch by Martin Probst. Thank you!
llvm-svn: 248714
Before:
DEPRECATED("Use NewClass::NewFunction instead.") int OldFunction(
const string ¶meter) {}
Could not be formatted at all, as clang-format would both require and
disallow the break before "int".
llvm-svn: 245846
This is a bit of a step back of what we did in r222531, as there are
some corner cases in C++, where this kind of formatting is really bad.
Example:
Before:
virtual aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(std::function<bool()> IsKindWeWant = [&]() {
return true;
}, aaaaa aaaaaaaaa);
After:
virtual aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(std::function<bool()> IsKindWeWant =
[&]() { return true; },
aaaaa aaaaaaaaa);
The block formatting logic in JavaScript will probably go some other changes,
too, and we'll potentially be able to make the rules more consistent again. For
now, this seems to be the best approach for C++.
llvm-svn: 245694
Before:
class Test {
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa): aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {}
}
After:
class Test {
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa):
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {}
}
llvm-svn: 241908
__attribute__ was treated as the name of a function definition, with the
tokens in parentheses being the parameter list. This formats incorrectly
with AlwaysBreakAfterDefinitionReturnType. Fix it by treating
__attribute__ like decltype.
Patch by Strager Neds, thank you.
llvm-svn: 241439
This makes this consistent with non-typescript enums.
Also shuffle the language-dependent stuff in mustBreakBefore to a
single location.
Patch initiated by Martin Probst.
llvm-svn: 239894
Before:
int c = []() -> int *{ return 2; }();
After:
int c = []() -> int * { return 2; }();
Based on patch by James Dennett (http://reviews.llvm.org/D10410), thank you!
llvm-svn: 239600
assignments as enums.
Top level object literals are treated as enums, and their k/v pairs are put on
separate lines:
X.Y = {
A: 1,
B: 2
};
However assignments within blocks should not be affected:
function x() {
y = {a:1, b:2};
}
This change fixes the second case. Patch by Martin Probst.
llvm-svn: 239462
I have not succeeded in writing a proper test case for this yet and we
also need to solve the underlying fundamental problem of trying too
many combinations with nested blocks (basically this somewhat works
around our Dijkstra algorithm). Preventing this linebreak is good
anyways as usually the penalties never make us choose it (that's why I
can't create a test) and it also looks ugly.
Also cleaned up state comparison code that I discovered while hunting
this down.
llvm-svn: 239398
Before:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t) -> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a)
.aaaaaaaa());
After:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t)
-> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a).aaaaaaaa());
Also add a test case for a difficult template parsing case I stumbled accross.
Needs fixing.
llvm-svn: 239149
This is a more correct representation than using "Equality" introduced
in r238942 which was a quick fix to solve an actual regression.
According to the typescript spec, arrows behave like "low-precedence"
assignments.
Before:
var a = a.aaaaaaa((a: a) => aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbbb) &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbb));
After:
var a = a.aaaaaaa((a: a) => aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbbb) &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbb));
llvm-svn: 239137
Before:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> = [
new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(),
new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()
];
After:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> =
[new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(), new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()];
llvm-svn: 238909
Before:
someFunction(() =>
{
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
After:
someFunction(() => {
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
This is still bad, but at least it is consistent with what we do for other
function literals. Added corresponding tests.
llvm-svn: 238736
method expressions and array literals. They should not bind stronger
than regular parentheses or the braces of braced lists.
Specific test case in JavaScript:
Before:
var aaaaa: List<
SomeThing> = [new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(), new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()];
After:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> = [
new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(),
new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()
];
llvm-svn: 238400
Specifically, don't add a space before it.
Before:
someFunction(... a);
var x = [1, 2, ... a];
After:
someFunction(...a);
var x = [1, 2, ...a];
llvm-svn: 238183
"void (*my_function)(void)" should become "void (*my_function) (void)" when
SpaceBeforeParens is set to 'Always'
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9835
llvm-svn: 237704
Before:
for (SmallVectorImpl<TemplateIdAnnotationn *>::iterator I =
Container.begin(),
E = Container.end();
I != E; ++I)
After:
for (SmallVectorImpl<TemplateIdAnnotationn *>::iterator
I = Container.begin(),
E = Container.end();
I != E; ++I)
This fixes llvm.org/PR23544.
llvm-svn: 237688
Before:
[call aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.
aaaaaaaa];
After:
[call aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaa];
This merely papers over the fact that we aren't parsing ObjC method calls
correctly. Also, the indentation is weird.
llvm-svn: 237681
Before:
ASSERT("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa")
<< aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
<< bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
After:
ASSERT("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa") << aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
<< bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
Also cleanup implementation a bit and only mark closing parenthesis of
these annotations.
llvm-svn: 237567
Generally, clang-format tries to keep label-value pairs on a single
line for stream operators. However, we should not do that if there is
just a single such pair, as that doesn't help much.
Before:
llvm::errs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaa: " << aaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaa);
After:
llvm::errs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaa: "
<< aaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaa);
Also remove old test case that was testing actual behavior any more.
llvm-svn: 237535
Some compilers ignore everything after a semicolon in such inline asm
blocks and thus, the closing brace must not be moved to the previous
line.
llvm-svn: 236946
Optional methods use ? tokens like this:
interface X { y?(): z; }
It seems easiest to detect and disambiguate these from ternary
expressions by checking if the code is in a declaration context. Turns
out that that didn't quite work properly for interfaces in Java and JS,
and for JS file root contexts.
Patch by Martin Probst, thank you.
llvm-svn: 236488
Parameters can have templated types and default values (= ...), which is
another location in which a template closer should be followed by
whitespace.
Patch by Martin Probst, thank you.
llvm-svn: 236382
This is now obvious as the pointer alignment behavior was changed.
Before (even with pointer alignment "Left"):
MACRO Constructor(const int &i) : a(a), b(b) {}
After:
MACRO Constructor(const int& i) : a(a), b(b) {}
llvm-svn: 235301
Daniel Jasper