This option evaluates an expression and, if the result is of pointer type, treats it as if it was an array of that many elements and displays such elements
This has a couple subtle points but is mostly as straightforward as it sounds
Add a parray N <expr> alias for this new mode
Also, extend the --object-description mode to do the moral equivalent of the above but display each element in --object-description mode
Add a poarray N <expr> alias for this
llvm-svn: 267372
Summary:
The original breakpoint location test was failing for linux, because the compilers here tend to
merge the full-object and subobject destructors even at -O0 (as a result, we are getting only 2
breakpoint locations, and not 4 as the test expected. The fixup in r266164 substantially weakened
the test, as it now did not check whether both kinds of destructors were being found.
Because of these contraints, I have altered the logic of the test. It sets the
breakpoint by name, and then independently verifies that the breakpoint is set on the correct
demangled symbol name (which is not very meaningful since both kinds of destructors demangle to
the same name) *and* the correct symbol address (which is obtained by looking up the mangled
symbol name).
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: ovyalov, zturner, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19052
llvm-svn: 266416
The android dirty stderr problem has uncovered an issue where lldbutil.expect_state_changes was
reading events other than state change events, which resulted in general confusion. Make it more
strict to accept *only* state changes.
llvm-svn: 266327
A number of test cases were failing on big-endian systems simply due to
byte order assumptions in the tests themselves, and no underlying bug
in LLDB.
These two test cases:
tools/lldb-server/lldbgdbserverutils.py
python_api/process/TestProcessAPI.py
actually check for big-endian target byte order, but contain Python errors
in the corresponding code paths.
These test cases:
functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-python-synth/TestDataFormatterPythonSynth.py
functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-smart-array/TestDataFormatterSmartArray.py
functionalities/data-formatter/synthcapping/TestSyntheticCapping.py
lang/cpp/frame-var-anon-unions/TestFrameVariableAnonymousUnions.py
python_api/sbdata/TestSBData.py (first change)
could be fixed to check for big-endian target byte order and update the
expected result strings accordingly. For the two synthetic tests, I've
also updated the source to make sure the fake_a value is always nonzero
on both big- and little-endian platforms.
These test case:
python_api/sbdata/TestSBData.py (second change)
functionalities/memory/cache/TestMemoryCache.py
simply accessed memory with the wrong size, which wasn't noticed on LE
but fails on BE.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18985
llvm-svn: 266315
This fixes several test case failure on s390x caused by the fact that
on this platform, the default "char" type is unsigned.
- In ClangASTContext::GetBuiltinTypeForEncodingAndBitSize we should return
an explicit *signed* char type for encoding eEncodingSint and bit size 8,
instead of the default platform char type (which may be unsigned).
This fix matches existing code in ClangASTContext::GetIntTypeFromBitSize,
and fixes the TestClangASTContext.TestBuiltinTypeForEncodingAndBitSize
unit test case.
- The test/expression_command/char/TestExprsChar.py test case is known to
fail on platforms defaulting to unsigned char (pr23069), and just needs
to be xfailed on s390x like on arm.
- The test/functionalities/watchpoint/watchpoint_on_vectors/main.c test
case defines a vector of "char" and implicitly assumes to be signed.
Use an explicit "signed char" instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18979
llvm-svn: 266309
This patch adds support for Linux on SystemZ:
- A new ArchSpec value of eCore_s390x_generic
- A new directory Plugins/ABI/SysV-s390x providing an ABI implementation
- Register context support
- Native Linux support including watchpoint support
- ELF core file support
- Misc. support throughout the code base (e.g. breakpoint opcodes)
- Test case updates to support the platform
This should provide complete support for debugging the SystemZ platform.
Not yet supported are optional features like transaction support (zEC12)
or SIMD vector support (z13).
There is no instruction emulation, since our ABI requires that all code
provide correct DWARF CFI at all PC locations in .eh_frame to support
unwinding (i.e. -fasynchronous-unwind-tables is on by default).
The implementation follows existing platforms in a mostly straightforward
manner. A couple of things that are different:
- We do not use PTRACE_PEEKUSER / PTRACE_POKEUSER to access single registers,
since some registers (access register) reside at offsets in the user area
that are multiples of 4, but the PTRACE_PEEKUSER interface only allows
accessing aligned 8-byte blocks in the user area. Instead, we use a s390
specific ptrace interface PTRACE_PEEKUSR_AREA / PTRACE_POKEUSR_AREA that
allows accessing a whole block of the user area in one go, so in effect
allowing to treat parts of the user area as register sets.
- SystemZ hardware does not provide any means to implement read watchpoints,
only write watchpoints. In fact, we can only support a *single* write
watchpoint (but this can span a range of arbitrary size). In LLDB this
means we support only a single watchpoint. I've set all test cases that
require read watchpoints (or multiple watchpoints) to expected failure
on the platform. [ Note that there were two test cases that install
a read/write watchpoint even though they nowhere rely on the "read"
property. I've changed those to simply use plain write watchpoints. ]
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18978
llvm-svn: 266308
When run with the multiprocess test runner, the getchar() trick doesn't work, so ninja check-lldb would fail on this test, but running the test directly worked fine.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19035
llvm-svn: 266145
(lldb) b ~Foo
(lldb) b Foo::~Foo
(lldb) b Bar::Foo::~Foo
Improved out C++ breakpoint locations tests as well to cover this issue.
<rdar://problem/25577252>
llvm-svn: 266139
The result variables aren't useful, and if you have a breakpoint on a
common function you can generate a lot of these. So I changed the
code that checks the condition to set ResultVariableIsInternal in the
EvaluateExpressionOptions that we pass to the execution.
Unfortunately, the check for this variable was done in the wrong place
(the static UserExpression::Evaluate) which is not how breakpoint
conditions execute expressions (UserExpression::Execute). So I moved
the check to UserExpression::Execute (which Evaluate also calls) and made the
overridden method DoExecute.
llvm-svn: 266093
this test was unintentionally XFAILed due to a change in the behavior of the expectedFailure
decorator. Fix that. Also, mark the test as debug-info independent while I'm in there.
llvm-svn: 266072
Previously we had 3 different method to run shell commands on the
target and 4 copy of code waiting until a given file appears on the
target device (used for syncronization). This CL merges these methods
to 1 run_platform_command and 1 wait_for_file_on_target functions
located in some utility classes.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18789
llvm-svn: 265398
Summary:
There was a bug in linux core file handling, where if there was a running process with the same
process id as the id in the core file, the core file debugging would fail, as we would pull some
pieces of information (ProcessInfo structure) from the running process instead of the core file.
I fix this by routing the ProcessInfo requests through the Process class and overriding it in
ProcessElfCore to return correct data.
A (slightly convoluted) test is included.
Reviewers: clayborg, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18697
llvm-svn: 265391
Teach LLDB that different shells have different characters they are sensitive to, and use that knowledge to do shell-aware escaping
This helps solve a class of problems on OS X where LLDB would try to launch via sh, and run into problems if the command line being passed to the inferior contained such special markers (hint: the shell would error out and we'd fail to launch)
This makes those launch scenarios work transparently via shell expansion
Slightly improve the error message when this kind of failure occurs to at least suggest that the user try going through 'process launch' directly
Fixes rdar://problem/22749408
llvm-svn: 265357
This addresses the same problem as r264846 (the test not expecting the situation when two thread
hit the watchpoint simultaneously), but for a different test.
llvm-svn: 265294
Enrico has a bug on him to make this work across older libcxx list
and newer libcxx list simultaneously. Needed in preparation of
getting the OS X public CI to run the TSAN tests.
tracked by:
rdar://25499635
llvm-svn: 265188
Summary:
the inferior in the test deliberately does not lock a mutex when accessing the watched variable.
The reason for that is unclear as, based on the logs, the original intention of the test was to
check whether watchpoints get propagated to newly created threads, which should work fine even
with a mutex. Furthermore, in the unlikely event (which I have still observed happening from time
to time) that two threads do manage the execute the "critical section" simultaneously, the test
will fail, as it is expecting the watchpoint "hit count" to be 1, but in this case it will be 2.
Given this, I have simply chose to lock the mutex always, so that we have more predictible
behavior. Watchpoints being hit simultaneously is still (and correctly!) tested by
TestConcurrentEvents.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18558
llvm-svn: 264846
Enrico Granata