unable to handle cases such as __asm mov eax, 8*-8.
This patch also attempts to simplify the state machine. Further, the error
reporting has been improved. Test cases included, but more will be added to
the clang side shortly.
rdar://13668445
llvm-svn: 179719
immediate displacement. Specifically, add support for generating the proper IR.
We've been able to parse this for some time now. Test case to be added on the
clang side.
Part of rdar://13453209
llvm-svn: 179393
can build up the identifier string. No test case as support for looking up
these type of identifiers hasn't been implemented on the clang side.
Part of rdar://13499009
llvm-svn: 179336
wasn't always the start of the operand. If there was a symbol reference, then
Start pointed to that token. It's very likely there are other places that need
to be updated.
llvm-svn: 179210
Test cases that regressed due to r179115, plus a few more, were added in
r179182. Original commit message below:
[ms-inline asm] Use parsePrimaryExpr in lieu of parseExpression if we need to
parse an identifier. Otherwise, parseExpression may parse multiple tokens,
which makes it impossible to properly compute an immediate displacement.
An example of such a case is the source operand (i.e., [Symbol + ImmDisp]) in
the below example:
__asm mov eax, [Symbol + ImmDisp]
Part of rdar://13611297
llvm-svn: 179187
parse an identifier. Otherwise, parseExpression may parse multiple tokens,
which makes it impossible to properly compute an immediate displacement.
An example of such a case is the source operand (i.e., [Symbol + ImmDisp]) in
the below example:
__asm mov eax, [Symbol + ImmDisp]
The existing test cases exercise this patch.
rdar://13611297
llvm-svn: 179115
rather than deriving the StringRef from the Start and End SMLocs.
Using the Start and End SMLocs works fine for operands such as [Symbol], but
not for operands such as [Symbol + ImmDisp]. All existing test cases that
reference a variable exercise this patch.
rdar://13602265
llvm-svn: 179109
memory operands.
Essentially, this layers an infix calculator on top of the parsing state
machine. The scale on the index register is still expected to be an immediate
__asm mov eax, [eax + ebx*4]
and will not work with more complex expressions. For example,
__asm mov eax, [eax + ebx*(2*2)]
The plus and minus binary operators assume the numeric value of a register is
zero so as to not change the displacement. Register operands should never
be an operand for a multiply or divide operation; the scale*indexreg
expression is always replaced with a zero on the operand stack to prevent
such a case.
rdar://13521380
llvm-svn: 178881
qualifiers.
This patch only adds support for parsing these identifiers in the
X86AsmParser. The front-end interface isn't capable of looking up
these identifiers at this point in time. The end result is the
compiler now errors during object file emission, rather than at
parse time. Test case coming shortly.
Part of rdar://13499009 and PR13340
llvm-svn: 178566
an X86Operand, but also performs a Sema lookup and adds the sizing directive
when appropriate. Use this when parsing a bracketed statement. This is
necessary to get the instruction matching correct as well. Test case coming
on clang side.
rdar://13455408
llvm-svn: 177439
This is necessary not only for representing empty ranges, but for handling
multibyte characters in the input. (If the end pointer in a range refers to
a multibyte character, should it point to the beginning or the end of the
character in a char array?) Some of the code in the asm parsers was already
assuming this anyway.
llvm-svn: 171765
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
When an instruction as written requires 32-bit mode and we're assembling
in 64-bit mode, or vice-versa, issue a more specific diagnostic about
what's wrong.
rdar://12700702
llvm-svn: 167937
[register].field
The operator returns the value at the location pointed to by register plus the
offset of field within its structure or union. This patch only handles
immediate fields (i.e., [eax].4). The original displacement has to be a
MCConstantExpr as well.
Part of rdar://12470415 and rdar://12470514
llvm-svn: 166632
see the offsetof operator. Previously, we were matching something like MOVrm
in the front-end and later matching MOVrr in the back-end. This change makes
things more consistent. It also fixes cases where we can't match against a
memory operand as the source (test cases coming).
Part of rdar://12470317
llvm-svn: 166592
non-zero value as we don't know the actual value at this point. This is
necessary to get the matching correct in some cases. However, the actual value
set as the base register doesn't matter, since we're just matching not emitting.
llvm-svn: 166523
a memory operand. Retain this information and then add the sizing directives
to the IR. This allows the backend to do proper instruction selection.
llvm-svn: 166316
the interface between the front-end and the MC layer when parsing inline
assembly. Unfortunately, this is too deep into the parsing stack. Specifically,
we're unable to handle target-independent assembly (i.e., assembly directives,
labels, etc.). Note the MatchAndEmitInstruction() isn't the correct
abstraction either. I'll be exposing target-independent hooks shortly, so this
is really just a cleanup.
llvm-svn: 165858
of operand is specific to MS-style inline assembly and should not be generated
when parsing normal assembly.
The purpose of the wildcard operands are to allow the AsmParser to match
multiple instructions (i.e., MCInsts) to a given ms-style asm statement. For
the time being the matcher just returns the first match. This patch only
implements wildcard matches for memory operands. Support for register
wildcards will be added in the near future.
llvm-svn: 165057
map constraints and MCInst operands to inline asm operands. This replaces the
getMCInstOperandNum() function.
The logic to determine the constraints are not in place, so we still default to
a register constraint (i.e., "r"). Also, we no longer build the MCInst but
rather return just the opcode to get the MCInstrDesc.
llvm-svn: 164979
gas accepts this and it seems to be common enough to be worth supporting. This
doesn't affect the parsing of reg operands outside of .cfi directives.
llvm-svn: 163390
MatchInstructionImpl() function.
These values are used by the ConvertToMCInst() function to index into the
ConversionTable. The values are also needed to call the GetMCInstOperandNum()
function.
llvm-svn: 163101
Assertion failed: (Start.isValid() == End.isValid() && "Start and end should
either both be valid or both be invalid!")
when parsing inline asm. SMLoc assumes that the first char * in the source is
invalid. However, when parsing an inline asm the mnemonic is at this location.
I don't want to change SMLoc, so use a trivial workaround.
llvm-svn: 162381
this is the index of the operand that failed to match.
Note: This may cause a buildbot failure due to an API mismatch in clang. Should
recover with my next commit to clang.
llvm-svn: 162295
This new API will be used by clang to parse ms-style inline asms.
One goal of this project is to use this style of inline asm for targets other
then x86. Therefore, this API needs to be implemented for non-x86 targets at
some point in the future.
llvm-svn: 161624
rdar://10873652
As part of this I updated the llvm-mc disassembler C API to always call the
SymbolLookUp call back even if there is no getOpInfo call back. If there is a
getOpInfo call back that is tried first and then if that gets no information
then the SymbolLookUp is called. I also made the code more robust by
memset(3)'ing to zero the LLVMOpInfo1 struct before then setting
SymbolicOp.Value before for the call to getOpInfo. And also don't use any
values from the LLVMOpInfo1 struct if getOpInfo returns 0. And also don't
use any of the ReferenceType or ReferenceName values from SymbolLookUp if it
returns NULL. rdar://10873563 and rdar://10873683
For the X86 target also fixed bugs so the annotations get printed.
Also fixed a few places in the ARM target that was not producing symbolic
operands for some instructions. rdar://10878166
llvm-svn: 151267
In att style asm syntax memory operand size is derived from suffix attached with mnemonic. In intel style asm syntax it is part of memory operand hence predicate method check is required to select appropriate instruction.
llvm-svn: 148006
the X86 asmparser to produce ranges in the one case that was annoying me, for example:
test.s:10:15: error: invalid operand for instruction
movl 0(%rax), 0(%edx)
^~~~~~~
It should be straight-forward to enhance filecheck, tblgen, and/or the .ll parser to use
ranges where appropriate if someone is interested.
llvm-svn: 142106
Allow a target assembly parser to do context sensitive constraint checking
on a potential instruction match. This will be used, for example, to handle
Thumb2 IT block parsing.
llvm-svn: 137675
This can happen in cases where TableGen generated asm matcher cannot check
whether a register operand is in the right register class. e.g. mem operands.
rdar://8204588
llvm-svn: 136292
llvm-mc gives an "invalid operand" error for instructions that take an unsigned
immediate which have the high bit set such as:
pblendw $0xc5, %xmm2, %xmm1
llvm-mc treats all x86 immediates as signed values and range checks them.
A small number of x86 instructions use the imm8 field as a set of bits.
This change only changes those instructions and where the high bit is not
ignored. The others remain unchanged.
llvm-svn: 136287
Update the debug output interface for MCParsedAsmOperand to have a print()
method which takes an output stream argument, an << operator which invokes
the print method using the given stream, and a dump() method which prints
the operand to the dbgs() stream. This makes the interface more consistent
with the rest of LLVM, and more convenient to use at the debugger command
line.
llvm-svn: 135043
and MCSubtargetInfo.
- Added methods to update subtarget features (used when targets automatically
detect subtarget features or switch modes).
- Teach X86Subtarget to update MCSubtargetInfo features bits since the
MCSubtargetInfo layer can be shared with other modules.
- These fixes .code 16 / .code 32 support since mode switch is updated in
MCSubtargetInfo so MC code emitter can do the right thing.
llvm-svn: 134884
CPU, and feature string. Parsing some asm directives can change
subtarget state (e.g. .code 16) and it must be reflected in other
modules (e.g. MCCodeEmitter). That is, the MCSubtargetInfo instance
must be shared.
llvm-svn: 134795
- Each target asm parser now creates its own MCSubtatgetInfo (if needed).
- Changed AssemblerPredicate to take subtarget features which tablegen uses
to generate asm matcher subtarget feature queries. e.g.
"ModeThumb,FeatureThumb2" is translated to
"(Bits & ModeThumb) != 0 && (Bits & FeatureThumb2) != 0".
llvm-svn: 134678
instructions. I choose to handle this with an asmparser hack,
though it could be handled by changing all the instruction definitions
to allow be "setneb" instead of "setne". The asm parser hack is
better in this case, because we want the disassembler to produce
setne, not setneb.
llvm-svn: 120260
sahf movl 344(%rdi),%r14d
we used to produce:
t.s:2:1: error: unexpected token in argument list
^
we now produce:
t.s:1:11: error: unexpected token in argument list
sahf movl 344(%rdi),%r14d
^
rdar://8581401
llvm-svn: 119676
shift-by-1 instructions, where the asmstring doesn't contain
the implicit 1. It turns out that a bunch of these rotate
instructions were completely broken because they used 1
instead of $1.
This fixes assembly mismatches on "rclb $1, %bl" and friends,
where we used to generate the 3 byte form, we now generate the
proper 2-byte form.
llvm-svn: 118355
floating point stack instructions instead of looking for b/w/l/q.
This fixes issues where we'd accidentally match fistp to fistpl,
when it is in fact an ambiguous instruction.
This changes the behavior of llvm-mc to reject fstp, which was the
correct fix for rdar://8456389:
t.s:1:1: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit suffix (could be 'fstps', 'fstpl', or 'fstpt')
fstp (%rax)
it also causes us to correctly reject fistp and fist, which addresses
PR8528:
t.s:2:1: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit suffix (could be 'fistps', or 'fistpl')
fistp (%rax)
^
t.s:3:1: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit suffix (could be 'fists', or 'fistl')
fist (%rax)
^
Thanks to Ismail Donmez for tracking down the issue here!
llvm-svn: 118346
aliases installed and working. They now work when the
matched pattern and the result instruction have exactly
the same operand list.
This is now enough for us to define proper aliases for
movzx and movsx, implementing rdar://8017633 and PR7459.
Note that we do not accept instructions like:
movzx 0(%rsp), %rsi
GAS accepts this instruction, but it doesn't make any
sense because we don't know the size of the memory
operand. It could be 8/16/32 bits.
llvm-svn: 117901
directives, allowing things like this:
def : MnemonicAlias<"pop", "popl">, Requires<[In32BitMode]>;
def : MnemonicAlias<"pop", "popq">, Requires<[In64BitMode]>;
Move the rest of the X86 MnemonicAliases over to the .td file.
llvm-svn: 117830
Chad Rosier