Also, forgot to say in the commit message of r212238: Library authors will
see a warning about this issue if they build with -Wsystem-headers.
llvm-svn: 212243
r210091 made initialization checking more strict in c++11 mode. LWG2193 is
about changing standard libraries to still be valid under these new rules,
but older libstdc++ (e.g. libstdc++4.6 in -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG=1 mode, or stlport)
do not implement that yet. So fall back to the C++03 semantics for container
classes in system headers below the std namespace.
llvm-svn: 212238
ARMv8 adds (to both AArch32 and AArch64) acquiring and releasing
variants of the exclusive operations, in line with the C++11 memory
model.
This adds support for two new intrinsics to expose them to C & C++
developers directly: __builtin_arm_ldaex and __builtin_arm_stlex, in
direct analogy with the versions with no implicit barrier.
rdar://problem/15885451
llvm-svn: 212175
C++ [basic.start.main]p1: "It shall have a return type of type int"
ISO C is also clear about this, so only accept 'int' with qualifiers in GNUMode
C.
llvm-svn: 212171
Fixes PR20110, where Clang hits an assertion failure when it expects that the
sub-expression of a bit cast to pointer to also be a pointer, but gets a value
instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4280
llvm-svn: 212160
This source range is useful for all kinds of diagnostic QOI and refactoring
work, so let's make it more discoverable.
This commit also makes use of the new function to enhance various diagnostics
relating to return types and resolves an old FIXME.
llvm-svn: 212154
We'll want to share the implementation if anything else decides to check
for reserved names in future, so make this little snippet of code more
discoverable.
Also remove the __va_list_tag and __builtin_va_list special-case
checks. They're leftovers from before when the reserved name logic was
added.
No change in functionality.
llvm-svn: 212006
when casting a retainable object to a objc_bridge_related
CF type with the suggestion of applying the method
specified in the bridging attribute to the object.
// rdar://15932435
llvm-svn: 211807
Previously dllimport variables inside of template arguments relied on
not using the C++11 codepath when -fms-compatibility was set.
While this allowed us to achieve compatibility with MSVC, it did so at
the expense of MingW.
Instead, try to use the DeclRefExpr we dig out of the template argument.
If it has the dllimport attribute, accept it and skip the C++11
null-pointer check.
llvm-svn: 211766
This is a follow-up to David's r211677. For the following code,
we would end up referring to 'foo' in the initializer for 'arr',
and then fail to link, because 'foo' is dllimport and needs to be
accessed through the __imp_?foo.
__declspec(dllimport) extern const char foo[];
const char* f() {
static const char* const arr[] = { foo };
return arr[0];
}
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4299
llvm-svn: 211736
Consider the following code:
template <typename T> class Base {};
class __declspec(dllexport) class Derived : public Base<int> {}
When the base of an exported or imported class is a class template
specialization, MSVC will propagate the dll attribute to the base.
In the example code, Base<int> becomes a dllexported class.
This commit makes Clang do the proopagation when the base hasn't been
instantiated yet, and warns about it being unsupported otherwise.
This is different from MSVC, which allows changing a specialization
back and forth between dllimport and dllexport and seems to let the
last one win. Changing the dll attribute after instantiation would be
hard for us, and doesn't seem to come up in practice, so I think this
is a reasonable limitation to have.
MinGW doesn't do this kind of propagation.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4264
llvm-svn: 211725
Types defined in function prototype are diagnosed earlier in C++ compilation.
They are put into declaration context where the prototype is introduced. Later on,
when FunctionDecl object is created, these types are moved into the function context.
This patch fixes PR19018 and PR18963.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4145
llvm-svn: 211718
than one method with mismatched type of same selector name.
clang issues a warning to point this out since it may cause
undefined behavior. There are cases though that some APIs
don't care about user methods and such warnings are perceived as
noise. This patch allows users to add paren delimiters around
selector name to turn off such warnings. So, @selector((save:)) will
turn off the warning. It also provides 'fixit' so user knows
what to do. // rdar://16458579
llvm-svn: 211611
Something went wrong with r211426, it is an older version of this code
and should not have been committed. It was reverted with r211434.
Original commit message:
We didn't properly implement support for the sized integer suffixes.
Suffixes like i16 were essentially ignored instead of mapping them to
the appropriately sized integer type.
This fixes PR20008.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4132
llvm-svn: 211441
This reverts commit r211426.
This broke the arm bots. The crash can be reproduced on X86 by running.
./bin/clang -cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fms-extensions ~/llvm/clang/test/Lexer/ms-extensions.c -triple arm-linux
llvm-svn: 211434
We didn't properly implement support for the sized integer suffixes.
Suffixes like i16 were essentially ignored instead of mapping them to
the appropriately sized integer type.
This fixes PR20008.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4132
llvm-svn: 211426
and is unrelated to the NEON intrinsics in arm_neon.h. On little
endian machines it works fine, however on big endian machines it
exhibits surprising behaviour:
uint32x2_t x = {42, 64};
return vget_lane_u32(x, 0); // Will return 64.
Because of this, explicitly call out that it is unsupported on big
endian machines.
This patch will emit the following warning in big-endian mode:
test.c:3:15: warning: vector initializers are a GNU extension and are not compatible with NEON intrinsics [-Wgnu]
int32x4_t x = {0, 1, 2, 3};
^
test.c:3:15: note: consider using vld1q_s32() to initialize a vector from memory, or vcombine_s32(vcreate_s32(), vcreate_s32()) to initialize from integer constants
1 warning generated.
llvm-svn: 211362
When adding the implicit compound statement (required for Codegen?), the
end location was previously overridden by the start location, probably
based on the assumptions:
* The location of the compound statement should be the member's location
* The compound statement if present is the last element of a FunctionDecl
This patch changes the location of the compound statement to the
member's end location.
Code review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4175
llvm-svn: 211344
a qualified-id type because pointer is object of a forward
class declaration, include this info in a diagnostic note.
// rdar://10751015
llvm-svn: 211324
This patch fixes a crash when handling malformed arguments to loop pragmas such
as: "#pragma clang loop vectorize(()". Essentially any argument which is not an
identifier or constant resulted in a crash. This patch also changes a couple of
the error messages which weren't quite correct. New behavior with this patch vs
old behavior:
#pragma clang loop vectorize(1)
OLD: error: missing keyword; expected 'enable' or 'disable'
NEW: error: invalid argument; expected 'enable' or 'disable'
#pragma clang loop vectorize()
OLD: error: expected ')'
NEW: error: missing argument to loop pragma 'vectorize'
#pragma clang loop vectorize_width(bad)
OLD: error: missing value; expected a positive integer value
NEW: error: invalid argument; expected a positive integer value
#pragma clang loop vectorize(bad)
OLD: invalid keyword 'bad'; expected 'enable' or 'disable'
NEW: error: invalid argument; expected 'enable' or 'disable'
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4197
Patch by Mark Heffernan
llvm-svn: 211292
Fariborz Jahanian