This patch adds a dedicated class to keep track of each function's
layout. It also lays the groundwork for splitting functions into
multiple fragments (as opposed to a strict hot/cold split).
Reviewed By: maksfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129518
This reverts commit 3988bd1398.
Did not build on this bot:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/215/builds/6372
/usr/include/c++/9/bits/predefined_ops.h:177:11: error: no match for call to
‘(llvm::less_first) (std::pair<long unsigned int, llvm::bolt::BinaryBasicBlock*>&, const std::pair<long unsigned int, std::nullptr_t>&)’
177 | { return bool(_M_comp(*__it, __val)); }
One could reuse this functor instead of rolling out your own version.
There were a couple other cases where the code was similar, but not
quite the same, such as it might have an assertion in the lambda or other
constructs. Thus, I've not touched any of those, as it might change the
behavior in some way.
As per https://discourse.llvm.org/t/submitting-simple-nfc-patches/62640/3?u=steakhal
Chris Lattner
> LLVM intentionally has a “yes, you can apply common sense judgement to
> things” policy when it comes to code review. If you are doing mechanical
> patches (e.g. adopting less_first) that apply to the entire monorepo,
> then you don’t need everyone in the monorepo to sign off on it. Having
> some +1 validation from someone is useful, but you don’t need everyone
> whose code you touch to weigh in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126068
Check that the function will be emitted in the final binary. Preserving
old function address is needed in case it is PLT trampiline, that is
currently not moved by the BOLT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122098
AArch64 requires CI to be aligned to 8 bytes due to access instructions
restrictions. E.g. the ldr with imm, where imm must be aligned to 8 bytes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122065
Run tentativeLayoutRelocMode twice only if UseOldText option was passed.
Refactor BF loop to break on condtition met.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121825
The BinaryEmitter uses opts::AlignText value to align the hot text
section. Also check that the opts::AlignText is at least
equal opts::AlignFunctions for the same reason, as described in D121392.
Vladislav Khmelevsky,
Advanced Software Technology Lab, Huawei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121728
The cold text section alignment is set using the maximum alignment value
passed to the emitCodeAlignment. In order to calculate tentetive layout
right we will set the minimum alignment of such sections to the maximum
possible function alignment explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121392
Summary:
Refactor bolt/*/Passes to follow the braces rule for if/else/loop from
[LLVM Coding Standards](https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html).
(cherry picked from FBD33344642)
Summary:
The lower_bound might return the end iterator, the ignoring of which will
cause memory corruption.
Vladislav Khmelevsky,
Advanced Software Technology Lab, Huawei
(cherry picked from FBD33307803)
Summary:
Refactor members of BinaryBasicBlock. Replace some std containers with
ADT equivalents. The size of BinaryBasicBlock on x86-64 Linux is reduced
from 232 bytes to 192 bytes.
(cherry picked from FBD33081850)
Summary:
Moves source files into separate components, and make explicit
component dependency on each other, so LLVM build system knows how to
build BOLT in BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON.
Please use the -c merge.renamelimit=230 git option when rebasing your
work on top of this change.
To achieve this, we create a new library to hold core IR files (most
classes beginning with Binary in their names), a new library to hold
Utils, some command line options shared across both RewriteInstance
and core IR files, a new library called Rewrite to hold most classes
concerned with running top-level functions coordinating the binary
rewriting process, and a new library called Profile to hold classes
dealing with profile reading and writing.
To remove the dependency from BinaryContext into X86-specific classes,
we do some refactoring on the BinaryContext constructor to receive a
reference to the specific backend directly from RewriteInstance. Then,
the dependency on X86 or AArch64-specific classes is transfered to the
Rewrite library. We can't have the Core library depend on targets
because targets depend on Core (which would create a cycle).
Files implementing the entry point of a tool are transferred to the
tools/ folder. All header files are transferred to the include/
folder. The src/ folder was renamed to lib/.
(cherry picked from FBD32746834)
Fabian Parzefall