For exception handling, LSDA call sites have to be emitted for each
fragment individually. With this patch, call sites and respective LSDA
symbols are generated and associated with each fragment of their
function, such that they can be used by the emitter.
Reviewed By: maksfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132052
To enable split strategies that require view of the entire CFG (e.g. to
estimate cost of path from entry block), with this patch, all blocks of
a function are passed to `SplitStrategy::fragment`. Because this might
move non-outlineable blocks into a split fragment, these blocks are
moved back into the main fragment after fragmenting. This also gives
strategies the option to specify whether empty fragments should be
kept or removed.
Reviewed By: maksfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132423
This introduces an abstract base class for splitting strategies to
document the interface a strategy needs to implement, and also to avoid
code bloat of the `splitFunction` method.
Reviewed By: maksfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132054
This patch adds exception handling trampolines when a function is split
into more than two fragments. Trampolines are tracked per-fragment, such
that they can be removed if splitting is reversed.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132048
This adds a strategy to split functions into a random number of
fragments at randomly chosen split points.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130647
This adds a function splitting strategy that splits each outlineable
basic block into its own fragment. This is exposed through a new command
line option `--split-strategy`.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129827
This patch adds support to generate any number of sections that are
assigned to fragments of functions that are split more than two-way.
With this, a function's *nth* split fragment goes into section
`.text.cold.n`.
This also changes `FunctionLayout::erase` to make sure, that there are
no empty fragments at the end of the function. This sometimes happens
when blocks are erased from the function. To avoid creating symbols
pointing to these fragments, they need to be removed.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130521
This patch adds a dedicated class to keep track of each function's
layout. It also lays the groundwork for splitting functions into
multiple fragments (as opposed to a strict hot/cold split).
Reviewed By: maksfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129518
As we are moving towards support for multiple fragments, loops that
iterate over all basic blocks of a function, but do not depend on the
order of basic blocks in the final layout, should iterate over binary
functions directly, rather than the layout.
Eventually, all loops using the layout list should either iterate over
the function, or be aware of multiple layouts. This patch replaces
references to binary function's block layout with the binary function
itself where only little code changes are necessary.
Reviewed By: maksfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129585
When SplitFunctions pass adds a trampoline code for exception landing
pads (limited to shared objects), it may increase the size of the hot
fragment making it larger than the whole function pre-split. When this
happens, the pass reverts the splitting action by restoring the original
block order and marking all blocks hot.
However, if createEHTrampolines() added new blocks to the CFG and
modified invoke instructions, simply restoring the original block layout
will not suffice as the new CFG has more blocks.
For proper backout of the split, modify the original layout by merging
in trampoline blocks immediately before their matching targets. As a
result, the number of blocks increases, but the number of instructions
and the function size remains the same as pre-split.
Add an assertion for the number of blocks when updating a function
layout.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128696
For test purposes, we want to split functions at a random split point
to be able to test different layouts without relying on the profile.
This patch introduces an option, that randomly chooses a split point
to partition blocks of a function into hot and cold regions.
Reviewed By: Amir, yota9
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128773
The SplitFunctions pass does not distinguish between various splitting
modes anymore. This change updates the command line interface to
reflect this behavior by deprecating values passed to the
--split-function option.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128558
Add functionality to allow splitting code with C++ exceptions in shared
libraries and PIEs. To overcome a limitation in exception ranges format,
for functions with fragments spanning multiple sections, add trampoline
landing pads in the same section as the corresponding throwing range.
Reviewed By: Amir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127936
Summary:
Refactor bolt/*/Passes to follow the braces rule for if/else/loop from
[LLVM Coding Standards](https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html).
(cherry picked from FBD33344642)
Summary:
Switched members of BinaryFunction to ADT where it was possible and
made sense. As a result, the size of BinaryFunction on x86-64 Linux
reduced from 1624 bytes to 1448.
(cherry picked from FBD32981555)
Summary:
Moves source files into separate components, and make explicit
component dependency on each other, so LLVM build system knows how to
build BOLT in BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON.
Please use the -c merge.renamelimit=230 git option when rebasing your
work on top of this change.
To achieve this, we create a new library to hold core IR files (most
classes beginning with Binary in their names), a new library to hold
Utils, some command line options shared across both RewriteInstance
and core IR files, a new library called Rewrite to hold most classes
concerned with running top-level functions coordinating the binary
rewriting process, and a new library called Profile to hold classes
dealing with profile reading and writing.
To remove the dependency from BinaryContext into X86-specific classes,
we do some refactoring on the BinaryContext constructor to receive a
reference to the specific backend directly from RewriteInstance. Then,
the dependency on X86 or AArch64-specific classes is transfered to the
Rewrite library. We can't have the Core library depend on targets
because targets depend on Core (which would create a cycle).
Files implementing the entry point of a tool are transferred to the
tools/ folder. All header files are transferred to the include/
folder. The src/ folder was renamed to lib/.
(cherry picked from FBD32746834)
Fabian Parzefall