Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Salman Javed 9ff4f2dfea [clang-tidy] Fix #55134 (regression introduced by 5da7c04)
5da7c04 introduced a regression in the NOLINT macro checking loop, replacing the
call to `getImmediateExpansionRange().getBegin()` with
`getImmediateMacroCallerLoc()`, which has similar but subtly different
behaviour.

The consequence is that NOLINTs cannot suppress diagnostics when they are
attached to a token that came from a macro **argument**, rather than elsewhere
in the macro expansion.

Revert to pre-patch behaviour and add test cases to cover this issue.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126138
2022-05-25 11:30:58 +12:00
Salman Javed 5da7c04003 Re-land "Cache the locations of NOLINTBEGIN/END blocks" with fix for build bot 2022-01-27 01:03:27 +13:00
Salman Javed 8e29d19b8d Revert "[clang-tidy] Cache the locations of NOLINTBEGIN/END blocks"
Build warning here:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/57/builds/14322
2022-01-27 00:52:44 +13:00
Salman Javed 19eaad94c4 [clang-tidy] Cache the locations of NOLINTBEGIN/END blocks
Support for NOLINT(BEGIN/END) blocks (implemented in D108560) is
currently costly. This patch aims to improve the performance with the
following changes:

- The use of tokenized NOLINTs instead of a series of repetitive ad-hoc
string operations (`find()`, `split()`, `slice()`, regex matching etc).
- The caching of NOLINT(BEGIN/END) block locations. Determining these
locations each time a new diagnostic is raised is wasteful as it
requires reading and parsing the entire source file.

Move NOLINT-specific code from `ClangTidyDiagnosticConsumer` to new
purpose-built class `NoLintDirectiveHandler`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116085
2022-01-27 00:12:16 +13:00
Carlos Galvez bf6b0d1674 [clang-tidy] Support globbing in NOLINT* expressions
To simplify suppressing warnings (for example, for
when multiple check aliases are enabled).

The globbing format reuses the same code as for
globbing when enabling checks, so the semantics
and behavior is identical.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111208
2021-10-19 16:30:51 +00:00
Salman Javed 722e705f72 Revert 9b944c1843 with fixes
This reintroduces c0687e1984 (Add support
for `NOLINTBEGIN` ... `NOLINTEND` comments) but with fixes to the tests.
2021-09-29 08:00:45 -04:00
Aaron Ballman 9b944c1843 Revert "Add support for `NOLINTBEGIN` ... `NOLINTEND` comments"
This reverts commit c0687e1984.

There are testing failures being caught by bots.
See http://45.33.8.238/linux/56886/step_8.txt as an example.
2021-09-28 14:49:27 -04:00
Salman Javed c0687e1984 Add support for `NOLINTBEGIN` ... `NOLINTEND` comments
Add support for NOLINTBEGIN ... NOLINTEND comments to suppress
clang-tidy warnings over multiple lines. All lines between the "begin"
and "end" markers are suppressed.

Example:

// NOLINTBEGIN(some-check)
<Code with warnings to be suppressed, line 1>
<Code with warnings to be suppressed, line 2>
<Code with warnings to be suppressed, line 3>
// NOLINTEND(some-check)
Follows similar syntax as the NOLINT and NOLINTNEXTLINE comments
that are already implemented, i.e. allows multiple checks to be provided
in parentheses; suppresses all checks if the parentheses are omitted,
etc.

If the comments are misused, e.g. using a NOLINTBEGIN but not
terminating it with a NOLINTEND, a clang-tidy-nolint diagnostic
message pointing to the misuse is generated.

As part of implementing this feature, the following bugs were fixed in
existing code:

IsNOLINTFound(): IsNOLINTFound("NOLINT", Str) returns true when Str is
"NOLINTNEXTLINE". This is because the textual search finds NOLINT as
the stem of NOLINTNEXTLINE.

LineIsMarkedWithNOLINT(): NOLINTNEXTLINEs on the very first line of a
file are ignored. This is due to rsplit('\n\').second returning a blank
string when there are no more newline chars to split on.
2021-09-28 07:53:23 -04:00
Dmitri Gribenko 885c559369 [ClangTidy] Separate tests for infrastructure and checkers
Summary:
This change moves tests for checkers and infrastructure into separate
directories, making it easier to find infrastructure tests. Tests for
checkers are already easy to find because they are named after the
checker. Tests for infrastructure were difficult to find because they
were outnumbered by tests for checkers. Now they are in a separate
directory.

Reviewers: jfb, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri

Subscribers: srhines, nemanjai, aheejin, kbarton, christof, mgrang, arphaman, jfb, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68807

llvm-svn: 374540
2019-10-11 12:05:42 +00:00