The parser assumes that the lexer never emits coloncolon token for C code, but this assumption no longer holds in C2x attribute namespaces. As a result, stray coloncolon tokens out of attributes cause assertion failures and hangs in release build, which this patch tries to handle.
Crash input minimal example: `T n::v`
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133248
Allow register binding attribute on variables.
Report warning when register binding attribute applies to local variable or static variable.
It will be ignored in this case.
Type check for register binding is tracked with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57886.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134617
This implements WG14 N2927 and WG14 N2930, which together define the
feature for typeof and typeof_unqual, which get the type of their
argument as either fully qualified or fully unqualified. The argument
to either operator is either a type name or an expression. If given a
type name, the type information is pulled directly from the given name.
If given an expression, the type information is pulled from the
expression. Recursive use of these operators is allowed and has the
expected behavior (the innermost operator is resolved to a type, and
that's used to resolve the next layer of typeof specifier, until a
fully resolved type is determined.
Note, we already supported typeof in GNU mode as a non-conforming
extension and we are *not* exposing typeof_unqual as a non-conforming
extension in that mode, nor are we exposing typeof or typeof_unqual as
a nonconforming extension in other language modes. The GNU variant of
typeof supports a form where the parentheses are elided from the
operator when given an expression (e.g., typeof 0 i = 12;). When in C2x
mode, we do not support this extension.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134286
This patch implements P0634r3 that removes the need for 'typename' in certain contexts.
For example,
```
template <typename T>
using foo = T::type; // ok
```
This is also allowed in previous language versions as an extension, because I think it's pretty useful. :)
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53847
This is first part for support cbuffer/tbuffer.
The format for cbuffer/tbuffer is
BufferType [Name] [: register(b#)] { VariableDeclaration [: packoffset(c#.xyzw)]; ... };
More details at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/direct3dhlsl/dx-graphics-hlsl-constants
New keyword 'cbuffer' and 'tbuffer' are added.
New AST node HLSLBufferDecl is added.
Build AST for simple cbuffer/tbuffer without attribute support.
The special thing is variables declared inside cbuffer is exposed into global scope.
So isTransparentContext should return true for HLSLBuffer.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129883
LLVM contains a helpful function for getting the size of a C-style
array: `llvm::array_lengthof`. This is useful prior to C++17, but not as
helpful for C++17 or later: `std::size` already has support for C-style
arrays.
Change call sites to use `std::size` instead. Leave the few call sites that
use a locally defined `array_lengthof` that are meant to test previous bugs
with NTTPs in clang analyzer and SemaTemplate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133520
In Parser::ParseUsingDeclaration(...) when we call ParseEnumSpecifier(...) it is
not calling SetTypeSpecError() on DS when it detects an error. That means that
DS is left set to TST_unspecified. When we then pass DS into
Sema::ActOnUsingEnumDeclaration(...) we hit an llvm_unreachable(...) since it
expects it to be one of three states TST_error, TST_enum or TST_typename.
This fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57347
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132695
Adds
* `__add_lvalue_reference`
* `__add_pointer`
* `__add_rvalue_reference`
* `__decay`
* `__make_signed`
* `__make_unsigned`
* `__remove_all_extents`
* `__remove_extent`
* `__remove_const`
* `__remove_volatile`
* `__remove_cv`
* `__remove_pointer`
* `__remove_reference`
* `__remove_cvref`
These are all compiler built-in equivalents of the unary type traits
found in [[meta.trans]][1]. The compiler already has all of the
information it needs to answer these transformations, so we can skip
needing to make partial specialisations in standard library
implementations (we already do this for a lot of the query traits). This
will hopefully improve compile times, as we won't need use as much
memory in such a base part of the standard library.
[1]: http://wg21.link/meta.trans
Co-authored-by: zoecarver
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116203
Adds
* `__add_lvalue_reference`
* `__add_pointer`
* `__add_rvalue_reference`
* `__decay`
* `__make_signed`
* `__make_unsigned`
* `__remove_all_extents`
* `__remove_extent`
* `__remove_const`
* `__remove_volatile`
* `__remove_cv`
* `__remove_pointer`
* `__remove_reference`
* `__remove_cvref`
These are all compiler built-in equivalents of the unary type traits
found in [[meta.trans]][1]. The compiler already has all of the
information it needs to answer these transformations, so we can skip
needing to make partial specialisations in standard library
implementations (we already do this for a lot of the query traits). This
will hopefully improve compile times, as we won't need use as much
memory in such a base part of the standard library.
[1]: http://wg21.link/meta.trans
Co-authored-by: zoecarver
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116203
C99 6.7.4p2 clarifies that a function specifier can only be used in the
declaration of a function. _Noreturn is a function specifier, so it is
a constraint violation to write it on a structure or union field, but
we missed that case.
Fixes#56800
report an error when encountering 'while' token parsing declarator
```
clang/test/Parser/while-loop-outside-function.c:3:1: error: while loop outside of a function
while // expected-error {{while loop outside of a function}}
^
clang/test/Parser/while-loop-outside-function.c:7:1: error: while loop outside of a function
while // expected-error {{while loop outside of a function}}
^
```
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/34462
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129573
"Ascii" StringLiteral instances are actually narrow strings
that are UTF-8 encoded and do not have an encoding prefix.
(UTF8 StringLiteral are also UTF-8 encoded strings, but with
the u8 prefix.
To avoid possible confusion both with actuall ASCII strings,
and with future works extending the set of literal encodings
supported by clang, this rename StringLiteral::isAscii() to
isOrdinary(), matching C++ standard terminology.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128762
Before D126061, Clang would warn about this code
```
struct X {
[[deprecated]] struct Y {};
};
```
with the warning
attribute 'deprecated' is ignored, place it after "struct" to apply attribute to type declaration
D126061 inadvertently caused this warning to no longer be emitted. This patch
restores the previous behavior.
The reason for the bug is that after D126061, C++11 attributes applied to a
member declaration are no longer placed in `DS.getAttributes()` but are instead
tracked in a separate list (`DeclAttrs`). In the case of a free-standing
decl-specifier-seq, we would simply ignore the contents of this list. Instead,
we now pass the list on to `Sema::ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec()` so that it can
issue the appropriate warning.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128499
For backwards compatiblity, we emit only a warning instead of an error if the
attribute is one of the existing type attributes that we have historically
allowed to "slide" to the `DeclSpec` just as if it had been specified in GNU
syntax. (We will call these "legacy type attributes" below.)
The high-level changes that achieve this are:
- We introduce a new field `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (with appropriate
accessors) to store C++11 attributes occurring in the attribute-specifier-seq
at the beginning of a simple-declaration (and other similar declarations).
Previously, these attributes were placed on the `DeclSpec`, which made it
impossible to reconstruct later on whether the attributes had in fact been
placed on the decl-specifier-seq or ahead of the declaration.
- In the parser, we propgate declaration attributes and decl-specifier-seq
attributes separately until we can place them in
`Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` or `DeclSpec::Attrs`, respectively.
- In `ProcessDeclAttributes()`, in addition to processing declarator attributes,
we now also process the attributes from `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (except
if they are legacy type attributes).
- In `ConvertDeclSpecToType()`, in addition to processing `DeclSpec` attributes,
we also process any legacy type attributes that occur in
`Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (and emit a warning).
- We make `ProcessDeclAttribute` emit an error if it sees any non-declaration
attributes in C++11 syntax, except in the following cases:
- If it is being called for attributes on a `DeclSpec` or `DeclaratorChunk`
- If the attribute is a legacy type attribute (in which case we only emit
a warning)
The standard justifies treating attributes at the beginning of a
simple-declaration and attributes after a declarator-id the same. Here are some
relevant parts of the standard:
- The attribute-specifier-seq at the beginning of a simple-declaration
"appertains to each of the entities declared by the declarators of the
init-declarator-list" (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.pre-3)
- "In the declaration for an entity, attributes appertaining to that entity can
appear at the start of the declaration and after the declarator-id for that
declaration." (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.pre-note-2)
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq following a declarator-id appertains to
the entity that is declared."
(https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.meaning.general-1)
The standard contains similar wording to that for a simple-declaration in other
similar types of declarations, for example:
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq in a parameter-declaration appertains to
the parameter." (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct#3)
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq in an exception-declaration appertains
to the parameter of the catch clause" (https://eel.is/c++draft/except.pre#1)
The new behavior is tested both on the newly added type attribute
`annotate_type`, for which we emit errors, and for the legacy type attribute
`address_space` (chosen somewhat randomly from the various legacy type
attributes), for which we emit warnings.
Depends On D111548
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126061
Currently, Clang accepts this code in C mode (where the tag is required
to be used) but rejects it in C++ mode thinking that the association is
defining a new type.
void foo(void) {
struct S { int a; };
_Generic(something, struct S : 1);
}
Clang thinks this in C++ because it sees struct S : when parsing the
class specifier and decides that must be a type definition (because the
colon signifies the presence of a base class type). This patch adds a
new declarator context to represent a _Generic association so that we
can distinguish these situations properly.
Fixes#55562
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126969
With sufficiently tortured code, it's possible to cause a stack
overflow when parsing declarators. Thus, we now check for resource
exhaustion when recursively parsing declarators so that we can at least
warn the user we're about to crash before we actually crash.
Fixes#51642
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124915
CUDA/HIP programs use __noinline__ like a keyword e.g.
__noinline__ void foo() {} since __noinline__ is defined
as a macro __attribute__((noinline)) in CUDA/HIP runtime
header files.
However, gcc and clang supports __attribute__((__noinline__))
the same as __attribute__((noinline)). Some C++ libraries
use __attribute__((__noinline__)) in their header files.
When CUDA/HIP programs include such header files,
clang will emit error about invalid attributes.
This patch fixes this issue by supporting __noinline__ as
a keyword, so that CUDA/HIP runtime could remove
the macro definition.
Reviewed by: Aaron Ballman, Artem Belevich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124866
We had a think-o that would allow a user to declare a scoped
enumeration in C language modes "as a C++11 extension". This is a
think-o because there's no way for the user to spell the name of the
enumerators; C does not have '::' for a fully-qualified name. See
commit d0d87b5972 for details on why this
is unintentional for C.
Fixes#42372
C89 allowed a type specifier to be elided with the resulting type being
int, aka implicit int behavior. This feature was subsequently removed
in C99 without a deprecation period, so implementations continued to
support the feature. Now, as with implicit function declarations, is a
good time to reevaluate the need for this support.
This patch allows -Wimplicit-int to issue warnings in C89 mode (off by
default), defaults the warning to an error in C99 through C17, and
disables support for the feature entirely in C2x. It also removes a
warning about missing declaration specifiers that really was just an
implicit int warning in disguise and other minor related cleanups.
WG14 has elected to remove support for K&R C functions in C2x. The
feature was introduced into C89 already deprecated, so after this long
of a deprecation period, the committee has made an empty parameter list
mean the same thing in C as it means in C++: the function accepts no
arguments exactly as if the function were written with (void) as the
parameter list.
This patch implements WG14 N2841 No function declarators without
prototypes (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2841.htm)
and WG14 N2432 Remove support for function definitions with identifier
lists (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2432.pdf).
It also adds The -fno-knr-functions command line option to opt into
this behavior in other language modes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123955
HLSL has a language feature called Semantics which get attached to
declarations like attributes and are used in a variety of ways.
One example of semantic use is here with the `SV_GroupIndex` semantic
which, when applied to an input for a compute shader is pre-populated
by the driver with a flattened thread index.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122699
# Conflicts:
# clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
# clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td
As statement expression makes no sense in the default argument,
this patch tries to disable it in the all cases.
Please note that the statement expression is a GNU extension, which
means that Clang should be consistent with GCC. However, there's no
response from GCC devs since we have raised the issue for several weeks.
In this case, I think we can disallow statement expressions as a default
parameter in general for now, and relax the restriction if GCC folks
decide to retain the feature for functions but not lambdas in the
future.
Related discussion: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104765
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53488
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119609
Move the SourceRange from the old ParsedAttributesWithRange into
ParsedAttributesView, so we have source range information available
everywhere we use attributes.
This also removes ParsedAttributesWithRange (replaced by simply using
ParsedAttributes) and ParsedAttributesVieWithRange (replaced by using
ParsedAttributesView).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121201
This adds support for multiple attributes in `#pragma clang attribute push`, for example:
```
```
or
```
```
Related attributes can now be applied with a single pragma, which makes it harder for developers to make an accidental error later when editing the code.
rdar://78269653
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121283
It's almost always entirely unused and if it is used, the end of the
attribute range can be used instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120888
These changes make the Clang parser recognize expression parameter pack
expansion and initializer lists in attribute arguments. Because
expression parameter pack expansion requires additional handling while
creating and instantiating templates, the support for them must be
explicitly supported through the AcceptsExprPack flag.
Handling expression pack expansions may require a delay to when the
arguments of an attribute are correctly populated. To this end,
attributes that are set to accept these - through setting the
AcceptsExprPack flag - will automatically have an additional variadic
expression argument member named DelayedArgs. This member is not
exposed the same way other arguments are but is set through the new
CreateWithDelayedArgs creator function generated for applicable
attributes.
To illustrate how to implement support for expression pack expansion
support, clang::annotate is made to support pack expansions. This is
done by making handleAnnotationAttr delay setting the actual attribute
arguments until after template instantiation if it was unable to
populate the arguments due to dependencies in the parsed expressions.
This reverts commit ef82063207.
- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLExtras, which will now
never be called.
- Calling it without llvm:: breaks C++17 compat
E.g. `Concept auto Func();`
The nameLoc for the constained auto type loc pointed to the concept name
loc, it should be the auto token loc. This patch fixes it, and remove
a relevant hack in clang-tidy check.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117009
The patch was reverted because it caused a crash during PCH build -- we
missed to update the RParenLoc in TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformAutoType.
This relands 55d96ac and 37ec65e with a test and fix.
Implementation is based on the "expected type" as used for
designated-initializers in braced init lists. This means it can deduce the type
in some cases where it's not written:
void foo(Widget);
foo({ /*help here*/ });
Only basic constructor calls are in scope of this patch, excluded are:
- aggregate initialization (no help is offered for aggregates)
- initializer_list initialization (no help is offered for these constructors)
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/306
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116317
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
Jialun Hu