This new CTU implementation is the natural extension of the normal single TU
analysis. The approach consists of two analysis phases. During the first phase,
we do a normal single TU analysis. During this phase, if we find a foreign
function (that could be inlined from another TU) then we don’t inline that
immediately, we rather mark that to be analysed later.
When the first phase is finished then we start the second phase, the CTU phase.
In this phase, we continue the analysis from that point (exploded node)
which had been enqueued during the first phase. We gradually extend the
exploded graph of the single TU analysis with the new node that was
created by the inlining of the foreign function.
We count the number of analysis steps of the first phase and we limit the
second (ctu) phase with this number.
This new implementation makes it convenient for the users to run the
single-TU and the CTU analysis in one go, they don't need to run the two
analysis separately. Thus, we name this new implementation as "onego" CTU.
Discussion:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-much-faster-cross-translation-unit-ctu-analysis-implementation/61728
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123773
We found a case where Typedef Name Declarations were not being added
correctly when importing builtin types. This exposed the need for a
TypedefNameDecl visitor so these types can be added by RecordDecl and
fields.
This code is covered by the ASTImporterTest cases that use the implicit
struct __NSConstantString_tag definitions.
Thanks to @martong for the debugging assist!
Depends on D83970.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83992
Gabor Marton