While working on D53847, I noticed that this test would fail once we
started recognizing the types in the modified `export` statement [0].
The tests would fail because Clang would emit a "declaration does not
declare anything" diagnostic instead of the expected namespace scope
diagnostic.
I believe that the test is currently incorrectly passing because Clang
doesn't parse the type and therefore doesn't treat the statement as a
declaration. My understanding is that the intention of this test case is
that it wants to export a `struct` type, which I believe requires a
`struct` keyword, even for types with template parameters. With this
change, the only error with these two statements should be the
namespace scope issue.
[0]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53847?id=462032#inline-1297053
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134578
Now the implementation would accept following code:
```
//--- impl.cppm
module M:impl;
class A {};
//--- M.cppm
export module M;
import :impl;
//--- Use.cpp
import M;
void test() {
A a; // Expected error. A is not visible here.
}
```
which is clearly wrong. The root cause is the implementation of
`isInCurrentModule` would return true if the module is a partition! So
in the above example, although Use.cpp is not a module unit,
`isInCurrentModule ` would still return true when the compiler tries to
see if the owning module of `A` is the current module. I believe this is
an oversight. This patch tries to fix this problem.
Reviewed By: iains
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123837
This adjusts the handling for:
export module M;
export namespace {};
export namespace N {};
export using namespace N;
In the first case, we were allowing empty anonymous namespaces
as part of an extension allowing empty top-level entities, but that seems
inappropriate in this case, since the linkage would be internal for the
anonymous namespace. We now report an error for this.
The second case was producing a warning diagnostic that this was
accepted as an extension - however the C++20 standard does allow this
as well-formed.
In the third case we keep the current practice that this is accepted with a
warning (as an extension). The C++20 standard says it's an error.
We also ensure that using decls are only applied to items with external linkage.
This adjusts error messages for exports involving redeclarations in modules to
be more specific about the reason that the decl has been rejected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122119
This implements the parsing and recognition of module partition CMIs
and removes the FIXMEs in the parser.
Module partitions are recognised in the base computation of visibility,
however additional amendments to visibility follow in subsequent patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118586
Since the serialization code would recognize modules by names and the
name of all global module fragment is <global>, so that the
serialization code would complain for the same module.
This patch fixes this by using a unique global module fragment in Sema.
Before this patch, the compiler would fail on an assertion complaining
the duplicated modules.
Reviewed By: urnathan, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115610
Since only the decls inhabit in a namespace scope could be exported, it
is not meaningful to check it in CheckRedeclarationExported, which
implements [module.interface]/p6.
Reviewed By: urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118120
This fixes bug 47716.
According to [module.interface]p2, it is meaningless to export an entity
which is not in namespace scope.
The reason why the compiler crashes is that the compiler missed
ExportDecl when the compiler traverse the subclass of DeclContext. So
here is the crash.
Also, the patch implements [module.interface]p6 in
Sema::CheckRedeclaration* functions.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112903
Previously we would create global module fragment for extern linkage
declaration which is alreday in global module fragment. However, it is
clearly redundant to do so. This patch would check if the extern linkage
declaration are already in GMF before we create a GMF for it.
According to [module.unit]p7.2.3, a declaration within a linkage-specification
should be attached to the global module.
This let user to forward declare types across modules.
Reviewed by: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110215
Fix a few bugs where we would fail to properly determine header to
module correspondence when determining whether to suggest a #include or
import, and suggest a #include more often in language modes where there
is no import syntax. Generally, if the target is in a header with
include guards or #pragma once, we should suggest either #including or
importing that header, and not importing a module that happens to
textually include it.
In passing, improve the notes we attach to the corresponding
diagnostics: calling an entity that we couldn't see "previous" is
confusing.
const-qualified type is not implicitly given internal linkage. But a
variable template declared 'static' is.
This reinstates part of r359048, reverted in r359076.
llvm-svn: 359260
The change breaks libc++ with the follwing error:
In file included from valarray:4:
.../include/c++/v1/valarray:1062:60: error: explicit instantiation declaration of 'valarray<_Tp>' with internal linkage
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS valarray<size_t>::valarray(size_t))
^
.../include/c++/v1/valarray:1063:60: error: explicit instantiation declaration of '~valarray<_Tp>' with internal linkage
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS valarray<size_t>::~valarray())
llvm-svn: 359076
and the global and private module fragment.
For now, the private module fragment introducer is ignored, but use of
the global module fragment introducer should be properly enforced.
llvm-svn: 358353
Alan Zhao