In D92191, a bunch of test cases were added to check `clang-scan-deps` works in `clang-cl` mode as well.
We don't need to duplicate all test cases, though. Testing the few special cases we have in `clang-scan-deps` for `clang-cl` should be good enough:
1. Deducing output path (and therefore target name in our make output).
2. Ignoring `-Xclang` arguments in step 1.
3. Deducing resource directory by invoking the compiler executuable.
This test de-duplicates the extra clang-cl test cases.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith, saudi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121812
This reverts commit 199c397482.
This time, clang-scan-deps's search for output argument in clang-cl command line will now ignore arguments preceded by "-Xclang".
That way, it won't detect a /o argument in "-Xclang -ivfsoverlay -Xclang /opt/subpath"
Initial patch description:
clang-scan-deps contains some command line parsing and modifications.
This patch adds support for clang-cl command options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92191
clang-scan-deps contains some command line parsing and modifications.
This patch adds support for clang-cl command options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92191
clang-scan-deps contains some command line parsing and modifications.
This patch adds support for clang-cl command options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92191
The goal is to have 100% fidelity in clang-scan-deps behavior when
--analyze is present in compilation command.
At the same time I don't want to break clang-tidy which expects
__static_analyzer__ macro defined as built-in.
I introduce new cc1 options (-setup-static-analyzer) that controls
the macro definition and is conditionally set in driver.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68093
llvm-svn: 374815
Gulfem Savrun Yeniceri