This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
I wouldn't recommend writing code like the testcase; a function
parameter isn't atomic, so using an atomic type doesn't really make
sense. But it's valid, so clang shouldn't crash on it.
The code was assuming hasAggregateEvaluationKind(Ty) implies Ty is a
RecordType, which isn't true. Just use isRecordType() instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102015
The ability to specify alignment was recently added, and it's an
important property which we should ensure is set as expected by
Clang. (Especially before making further changes to Clang's code in
this area.) But, because it's on the end of the lines, the existing
tests all ignore it.
Therefore, update all the tests to also verify the expected alignment
for atomicrmw and cmpxchg. While I was in there, I also updated uses
of 'load atomic' and 'store atomic', and added the memory ordering,
where that was missing.
consider the _<width> variants as well, which we'll see if we're
performing the type checking in a template instantiation where the
call expression itself was originally not type-dependent. Fixes
PR11411.
llvm-svn: 145248
Nikita Popov