Currently we treat initializers with init_seg(compiler/lib) as similar
to any other init_seg, they simply have a global variable in the proper
section (".CRT$XCC" for compiler/".CRT$XCL" for lib) and are added to
llvm.used. However, this doesn't match with how LLVM sees normal (or
init_seg(user)) initializers via llvm.global_ctors. This
causes issues like incorrect init_seg(compiler) vs init_seg(user)
ordering due to GlobalOpt evaluating constructors, and the
ability to remove init_seg(compiler/lib) initializers at all.
Currently we use 'A' for priorities less than 200. Use 200 for
init_seg(compiler) (".CRT$XCC") and 400 for init_seg(lib) (".CRT$XCL"),
which do not append the priority to the section name. Priorities
between 200 and 400 use ".CRT$XCC${Priority}". This allows for
some wiggle room for people/future extensions that want to add
initializers between compiler and lib.
Fixes#56922
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131910
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
There are two types of dynamic initializer stubs. There's
`dynamic initializer for 'x''(void)
and
`dynamic initializer for `static Foo::Bar StaticDataMember''(void)
The second case is disambiguated from the first by the presence of
a ? after the operator code. So the first will appear something like
?__E<name> while the second will appear something like ?__E?<name>.
clang-cl was mangling these both the same though. This patch
matches behavior with cl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51500
llvm-svn: 341117
Summary:
This is needed to avoid conflicts in mangled names for codeview types in
anonymous namespaces. In CodeView, types refer to each other typically
through forward declarations, which contain mangled names. These names
have to be unique, otherwise the debugger will look up the mangled name
and find the wrong definition.
Furthermore, ThinLTO will deduplicate the types, and debug info
verification can fail when the types have the wrong sizes. This is
PR38608.
Fixes PR38609.
Reviewers: majnemer, inglorion, hans
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, aprantl, JDevlieghere, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50877
llvm-svn: 340079
The tests that failed on a windows host have been fixed.
Original message:
Start setting dso_local for COFF.
With this there are still some GVs where we don't set dso_local
because setGVProperties is never called. I intend to fix that in
followup commits. This is just the bare minimum to teach
shouldAssumeDSOLocal what it should do for COFF.
llvm-svn: 325940
With this there are still some GVs where we don't set dso_local
because setGVProperties is never called. I intend to fix that in
followup commits. This is just the bare minimum to teach
shouldAssumeDSOLocal what it should do for COFF.
llvm-svn: 325915
Summary:
This pragma is very rare. We could *hypothetically* lower some uses of
it down to @llvm.global_ctors, but given that GlobalOpt isn't able to
optimize prioritized global ctors today, there's really no point.
If we wanted to do this in the future, I would check if the section used
in the pragma started with ".CRT$XC" and had up to two characters after
it. Those two characters could form the 16-bit initialization priority
that we support in @llvm.global_ctors. We would have to teach LLVM to
lower prioritized global ctors on COFF as well.
This should let us compile some silly uses of this pragma in WebKit /
Blink.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4549
llvm-svn: 213593
By ignoring this pragma with a warning, we're essentially miscompiling
the user's program. WebKit / Blink use this pragma to disable dynamic
initialization and finalization of some static data, and running the
dtors crashes the program.
Error out for now, so that /fallback compiles the TU correctly with
MSVC. This pragma should be implemented some time this month, and we
can remove this hack.
llvm-svn: 205554
Arthur Eubanks