unevaluated context
Closes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58133
The direct cause for this issue is that the compilation process
continues after it found it is in a invalid state. [expr.await]p2 says
clearly that the co_await expressions are not allowed to appear in
unevaluated context. So we can exit early in this case. It also reduces
many redundant diagnostic messages (Such as 'expression with side
effects has no effect in an unevaluated context').
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
This reverts commit b7e77ff25f.
Reason: Broke sanitizer builds bots + libcxx. 'static assertion
expression is not an integral constant expression'. More details
available in the Phabricator review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
This patch tries to implement RVO for coroutine's return object got from
get_return_object.
From [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]/p7 we could know that the return value of
get_return_object is either a reference or a prvalue. So it makes sense
to do copy elision for the return value. The return object should be
constructed directly into the storage where they would otherwise be
copied/moved to.
Test Plan: folly, check-all
Reviewed By: junparser
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117087
See the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D100282. The coroutine
marked always inline might not be inlined properly in current compiler
support. Since the coroutine would be splitted into pieces. And the call
to resume() and destroy() functions might be indirect call. Also the
ramp function wouldn't get inlined under O0 due to pipeline ordering
problems. It might be different to what users expects to. Emit a warning
to tell it.
This is what GCC does too: https://godbolt.org/z/7eajb1Gf8
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115867
According to [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]p6, the promise_type is allowed to
not define return_void nor return_value:
> If searches for the names return_void and return_value in the scope
> of the promise type each find any declarations, the program is
> ill-formed.
> [Note 1: If return_void is found, flowing off the end of a coroutine is
> equivalent to a co_return with no operand. Otherwise, flowing off the
> end of a coroutine results in
> undefined behavior ([stmt.return.coroutine]). — end note]
So the program isn't ill-formed if the promise_type doesn't define
return_void nor return_value. It is just a potential UB. So the program
should be allowed to compile.
Reviewed By: urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116204
Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are defined in
std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft
like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std
namespace instead of std::experimental namespace.
And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I
think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the
experiment namespace now.
This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace
first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in
std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std
namespace. So the existing codes wouldn't be break after update
compiler.
And in case the compiler found std::coroutine_traits and
std::experimental::coroutine_traits at the same time, it would emit an
error for it.
The support for looking up std::experimental::coroutine_traits would be
removed in Clang16.
Reviewed By: lxfind, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5
Reverted in f9ad1d1c77 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
Looks like lldb has some issues with this - somehow it causes lldb to
treat a "char[N]" type as an array of chars (prints them out
individually) but a "char [N]" is printed as a string. (even though the
DWARF doesn't have this string in it - it's something to do with the
string lldb generates for itself using clang)
This reverts commit 277623f4d5.
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This reverts commit 2fbd254aa4, which broke the libc++ CI. I'm reverting
to get things stable again until we've figured out a way forward.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
Summary: Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are
defined in std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft
like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std
namespace instead of std::experimental namespace.
And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I
think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the
experiment namespace now.
But move the coroutine component into the std namespace may be an break
change. So I planned to split this change into two patch. One in clang
and other in libcxx.
This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace
first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in
std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std
namespace and emit a warning in this case. So the existing codes
wouldn't be break after update compiler.
Test Plan: check-clang, check-libcxx
Reviewed By: lxfind
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
This change caused build errors related to move-only __block variables,
see discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99696
> This expands NRVO propagation for more cases:
>
> Parse analysis improvement:
> * Lambdas and Blocks with dependent return type can have their variables
> marked as NRVO Candidates.
>
> Variable instantiation improvements:
> * Fixes crash when instantiating NRVO variables in Blocks.
> * Functions, Lambdas, and Blocks which have auto return type have their
> variables' NRVO status propagated. For Blocks with non-auto return type,
> as a limitation, this propagation does not consider the actual return
> type.
>
> This also implements exclusion of VarDecls which are references to
> dependent types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99696
This also reverts the follow-on change which was hard to tease apart
form the one above:
> "[clang] Implement P2266 Simpler implicit move"
>
> This Implements [[http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2266r1.html|P2266 Simpler implicit move]].
>
> Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99005
This reverts commits 1e50c3d785 and
bf20631782.
This reworks a small set of tests, as preparatory work for implementing
P2266.
* Run for more standard versions, including c++2b.
* Normalize file names and run commands.
* Adds some extra tests.
New Coroutine tests taken from Aaron Puchert's D68845.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99225
Combined with 'da98651 - Revert "DR2064:
decltype(E) is only a dependent', this change (5a391d3) caused verifier
errors when building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/1168494#c1 for a
reproducer.
Additionally it reverts changes that were dependent on this one, see
below.
> Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
> to dependent declarations.
>
> Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
> function as being instantiation-dependent.
>
> This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
> declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
> Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
> instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
> of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
> dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
> treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
> involving such dependent declarations.
>
> This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
> imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
> early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
> when handling the template.
>
> Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b8, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.
This reverts commit 5a391d38ac.
It also restores clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp to its state before
da986511fb.
Revert "[c++20] P1907R1: Support for generalized non-type template arguments of scalar type."
> Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
> following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
>
> 7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
> ed13d8c667 by me
> 95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
> 430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
This reverts commit 4b574008ae.
Revert "[msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay"
> [msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay
> applied to an array the same as the array itself.
>
> This follows MS ABI, and corrects a regression from the implementation
> of generalized non-type template parameters, where we "forgot" how to
> mangle this case.
This reverts commit 18e093faf7.
if E is merely instantiation-dependent."
This change leaves us unable to distinguish between different function
templates that differ in only instantiation-dependent ways, for example
template<typename T> decltype(int(T())) f();
template<typename T> decltype(int(T(0))) f();
We'll need substantially better support for types that are
instantiation-dependent but not dependent before we can go ahead with
this change.
This reverts commit e3065ce238.
The argument to the `vec_step` builtin is not evaluated. Hoist the
diagnostic for this in `Sema::CheckUnaryExprOrTypeTraitOperand` such
that it comes before `Sema::CheckVecStepTraitOperandType`.
A minor side-effect of this change is that it also produces the
warning for `co_await` and `co_yield` as `sizeof` arguments now, which
seems to be reasonable given that the warning is emitted for `typeid`
already.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91348
Summary:
This patch addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46256
The spec of coroutine requires that the expression co_await promise.final_suspend() shall not be potentially-throwing.
To check this, we recursively look at every call (including Call, MemberCall, OperatorCall and Constructor) in all code
generated by the final suspend, and ensure that the callees are declared with noexcept. We also look at any returned data
type that requires explicit destruction, and check their destructors for noexcept.
This patch does not check declarations with dependent types yet, which will be done in future patches.
Updated all tests to add noexcept to the required functions, and added a dedicated test for this patch.
This patch might start to cause existing codebase fail to compile because most people may not have been strict in tagging
all the related functions noexcept.
Reviewers: lewissbaker, modocache, junparser
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: arphaman, junparser, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82029
Summary:
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D62550 @rsmith pointed out that there are
many situations in which a coroutine body statement may be
transformed/rebuilt as part of a template instantiation, and my naive
check whether the coroutine was a generic lambda was insufficient.
This is indeed true, as I've learned by reading more of the
TreeTransform code. Most transformations are written in a way that
doesn't assume the resulting types are not dependent types. So the
assertion in 'TransformCoroutineBodyStmt', that the promise type must no
longer be dependent, is out of place.
This patch removes the assertion, spruces up some code comments, and
adds a test that would have failed with my naive check from
https://reviews.llvm.org/D62550.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith, lewissbaker
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: junparser, EricWF, rsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70579
Summary:
The assertion of CoroutineParameterMoves happens when build coroutine function with arguments multiple time while fails to build promise type.
Fix: use return false instead.
Test Plan: check-clang
Reviewers: modocache, GorNishanov, rjmccall
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: rjmccall, EricWF, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69022
Patch by junparser (JunMa)!
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41909 describes an issue in which
a generic lambda that takes a dependent argument `auto set` causes the
template instantiation machinery for coroutine body statements to crash
with an ICE. The issue is two-fold:
1. The paths taken by the template instantiator contain several asserts
that the coroutine promise must not have a dependent type.
2. The template instantiator unconditionally builds corotuine statements
that depend on the promise type, which cannot be dependent.
To work around the issue, prevent the template instantiator from building
dependent coroutine statements if the coroutine promise type is dependent.
Since we only expect this to occur in the case of a generic lambda, limit
the workaround behavior to just that case.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, EricWF, lewissbaker, tks2103
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62550
llvm-svn: 362348
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076 added a new coroutine error that
prevented users from using 'co_await' or 'co_yield' within a exception
handler. However, it was reverted in https://reviews.llvm.org/rC356774
because it caused a regression in nested scopes in C++ catch statements,
as documented by https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41171.
The issue was due to an incorrect use of a `clang::ParseScope`. To fix:
1. Add a regression test for catch statement parsing that mimics the bug
report from https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41171.
2. Re-apply the coroutines error patch from
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076, but this time with the correct
ParseScope behavior.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, tks2103, rsmith, riccibruno, jbulow
Reviewed By: riccibruno
Subscribers: EricWF, jdoerfert, lewissbaker, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59752
llvm-svn: 356865
Before this commit, we emit unavailable errors for calls to functions during
overload resolution, and for references to all other declarations in
DiagnoseUseOfDecl. The early checks during overload resolution aren't as good as
the DiagnoseAvailabilityOfDecl based checks, as they error on the code from
PR40991. This commit fixes this by removing the early checking.
llvm.org/PR40991
rdar://48564179
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59394
llvm-svn: 356599
Summary:
Add citations to the Coroutines TS to the `isValidCoroutineContext`
function, as well as a FIXME and test for [expr.await]p2, which states
a co_await expression cannot be used in a default argument.
Test Plan: check-clang
Reviewers: GorNishanov, EricWF
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48519
llvm-svn: 335420
As identified and briefly discussed here:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37305
Converting a floating point number to an integer type when
the integral part is out of the range of the integer type is
undefined behavior in C. Additionally, CodeGen emits an undef
in this situation.
HOWEVER, we've been giving a warning that says that the value is
changed. This patch corrects the warning to list that it is actually
undefined behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46535
llvm-svn: 331673
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL325291 implemented Coroutines TS N4723
section [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]/7, but it performed lookup of allocator
functions within both the global and class scope, whereas the specified
behavior is to perform lookup for custom allocators within just the
class scope.
To fix, add parameters to the `Sema::FindAllocationFunctions` function
such that it can be used to lookup allocators in global scope,
class scope, or both (instead of just being able to look up in just global
scope or in both global and class scope). Then, use those parameters
from within the coroutine Sema.
This incorrect behavior had the unfortunate side-effect of causing the
bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36578 (or at least the reports
of that bug in C++ programs). That bug would occur for any C++ user with
a coroutine frame that took a single pointer argument, since it would
then find the global placement form `operator new`, described in the
C++ standard 18.6.1.3.1. This patch prevents Clang from generating code
that triggers the LLVM assert described in that bug report.
Test Plan: `check-clang`
Reviewers: GorNishanov, eric_niebler, lewissbaker
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: EricWF, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44552
llvm-svn: 328949
When SemaCoroutine looks for await_resume, it means it. No need for helpful: "Did you mean await_ready?" messages.
Fixes PR33477 and a couple of FIXMEs in test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp
llvm-svn: 328663
Previously, anytime the result of the resume expression in
operator co_await was unused, a warning was generated. This
patch fixes the issue by only generating the unused result warning
if calling `await_resume()` would also generate a warning.
llvm-svn: 328602
Summary:
Fix a test failure on ARM hosts that was caused by a difference in the type of
size_t, by using a target-agnostic definiton.
Test Plan:
```
clang -cc1 -internal-isystem build/lib/clang/7.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc \
-std=c++14 -fcoroutines-ts -verify clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp \
-fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions \
-triple armeb-none-eabi
```
llvm-svn: 325342
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D42605.
An implementation of the behavior described in `[dcl.fct.def.coroutine]/7`:
when a promise type overloads `operator new` using a "placement new"
that takes the same argument types as the coroutine function, that
overload is used when allocating the coroutine frame.
Simply passing references to the coroutine function parameters directly
to `operator new` results in invariant violations in LLVM's coroutine
splitting pass, so this implementation modifies Clang codegen to
produce allocator-specific alloc/store/loads for each parameter being
forwarded to the allocator.
Test Plan: `check-clang`
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, eric_niebler
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: lewissbaker, EricWF, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42606
llvm-svn: 325291
Summary:
Use corutine function arguments to initialize a promise type, but only
if the promise type defines a constructor that takes those arguments.
Otherwise, fall back to the default constructor.
Test Plan: check-clang
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, eric_niebler
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: toby-allsopp, lewissbaker, EricWF, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41820
llvm-svn: 323381
Summary:
We were not handling correctly rebuilding of parameter and were not creating copies for them.
Now we will always rebuild parameter moves in TreeTransform's TransformCoroutineBodyStmt.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33797
llvm-svn: 304620
Summary:
The expression `await_ready` is required to be contextually convertible to bool and `await_suspend` must be a prvalue of either `void` or `bool`.
This patch adds diagnostics for when those requirements are violated.
It also correctly performs the contextual conversion to bool on the result of `await_ready`
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33625
llvm-svn: 304094
Summary:
According to the PDTS it's perfectly legal to have a promise type that defines neither `return_value` nor `return_void`. However a coroutine that uses such a promise type will almost always have UB, because it can never `co_return`.
This patch changes Clang to diagnose such cases as an error. It also cleans up some of the diagnostic messages relating to member lookup in the promise type.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33534
llvm-svn: 303868
Chuanqi Xu