Capture the computed shadow begin/end values at the point where the
shadow is first created and reuse those values on reset. Introduce new
windows-specific function "ZeroMmapFixedRegion" for zeroing out an
address space region previously returned by one of the MmapFixed*
routines; call this function (on windows) from DoResetImpl
tsan_rtl.cpp instead of MmapFixedSuperNoReserve.
See https://github.com/golang/go/issues/53539#issuecomment-1168778740
for context; intended to help with updating the syso for Go's
windows/amd64 race detector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128909
While investigating another issue, I noticed that `MaybeReexec()` never
actually "re-executes via `execv()`" anymore. `DyldNeedsEnvVariable()`
only returned true on macOS 10.10 and below.
Usually, I try to avoid "unnecessary" cleanups (it's hard to be certain
that there truly is no fallout), but I decided to do this one because:
* I initially tricked myself into thinking that `MaybeReexec()` was
relevant to my original investigation (instead of being dead code).
* The deleted code itself is quite complicated.
* Over time a few other things were mushed into `MaybeReexec()`:
initializing `MonotonicNanoTime()`, verifying interceptors are
working, and stripping the `DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES` env var to avoid
problems when forking.
* This platform-specific thing leaked into `sanitizer_common.h`.
* The `ReexecDisabled()` config nob relies on the "strong overrides weak
pattern", which is now problematic and can be completely removed.
* `ReexecDisabled()` actually hid another issue with interceptors not
working in unit tests. I added an explicit `verify_interceptors`
(defaults to `true`) option instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129157
While investigating another issue, I noticed that `MaybeReexec()` never
actually "re-executes via `execv()`" anymore. `DyldNeedsEnvVariable()`
only returned true on macOS 10.10 and below.
Usually, I try to avoid "unnecessary" cleanups (it's hard to be certain
that there truly is no fallout), but I decided to do this one because:
* I initially tricked myself into thinking that `MaybeReexec()` was
relevant to my original investigation (instead of being dead code).
* The deleted code itself is quite complicated.
* Over time a few other things were mushed into `MaybeReexec()`:
initializing `MonotonicNanoTime()`, verifying interceptors are
working, and stripping the `DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES` env var to avoid
problems when forking.
* This platform-specific thing leaked into `sanitizer_common.h`.
* The `ReexecDisabled()` config nob relies on the "strong overrides weak
pattern", which is now problematic and can be completely removed.
* `ReexecDisabled()` actually hid another issue with interceptors not
working in unit tests. I added an explicit `verify_interceptors`
(defaults to `true`) option instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129157
This way downstream tools that read sanitizer output can differentiate between OOM errors
reported by sanitizers from other sanitizer errors.
Changes:
- Introduce ErrorIsOOM for checking if a platform-specific error code from an "mmap" is an OOM err.
- Add ReportOOMError which just prepends this error message to the start of a Report call.
- Replace some Reports for OOMs with calls to ReportOOMError.
- Update necessary tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127161
This is a follow up to [Sanitizers][Darwin] Rename Apple macro SANITIZER_MAC -> SANITIZER_APPLE (D125816)
Performed a global search/replace as in title against LLVM sources
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126263
Usually when we generated stacktraces the process is in error state, so
running hooks may crash the process and prevent meaningfull error report.
Symbolizer, unwinder and pthread are potential source of mallocs.
https://b.corp.google.com/issues/228110771
Reviewed By: kda
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123566
Usually when we generated stacktraces the process is in error state, so
running hooks may crash the process and prevent meaningfull error report.
Symbolizer, unwinder and pthread are potential source of mallocs.
https://b.corp.google.com/issues/228110771
Reviewed By: kda
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123566
Currently LoadedModule provides max_executable_address.
Replace it with just max_address.
It's only used for printing for human inspection and since
modules are non-overlapping, max_address is as good as max_executable_address
for matching addresses/PCs against modules (I assume it's used for that).
On the hand, max_address is more general and can used to match e.g. data addresses.
I want to use it for that purpose in future changes.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122906
This is a follow up to 4f3f4d6722
("sanitizer_common: fix __sanitizer_get_module_and_offset_for_pc signature mismatch")
which fixes a similar problem for msan build.
I am getting the following error compiling a unit test for code that
uses sanitizer_common headers and googletest transitively includes
sanitizer interface headers:
In file included from third_party/gwp_sanitizers/singlestep_test.cpp:3:
In file included from sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h:19:
sanitizer_interface_internal.h:41:5: error: typedef redefinition with different types
('struct __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments' vs 'struct __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments')
} __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments;
common_interface_defs.h:39:3: note: previous definition is here
} __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments;
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119546
D116208 may cause a macro clash on older versions of linux, where
fs.h defines a READ macro. This is resolved by switching to a more
typical casing style for non-macro symbols.
Reapplying with changes to the symbol names in various platform
specific code, which I missed previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118783
D116208 may cause a macro clash on older versions of linux, where
fs.h defines a READ macro. This is resolved by switching to a more
typical casing style for non-macro symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118783
This fixes the following error:
sanitizer_interface_internal.h:77:7: error: conflicting types for
'__sanitizer_get_module_and_offset_for_pc'
int __sanitizer_get_module_and_offset_for_pc(
common_interface_defs.h:349:5: note: previous declaration is here
int __sanitizer_get_module_and_offset_for_pc(void *pc, char *module_path,
I am getting it on a code that uses sanitizer_common (includes internal headers),
but also transitively gets includes of the public headers in tests
via an internal version of gtest.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118910
Currently we use very common names for macros like ACQUIRE/RELEASE,
which cause conflicts with system headers.
Prefix all macros with SANITIZER_ to avoid conflicts.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116652
According comments on D44404, something like that was the goal.
Reviewed By: morehouse, kstoimenov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114991
I am hitting some cases where /proc/self/maps does not fit into 64MB.
256MB is lots of memory, but it's not radically more than the current 64MB.
Ideally we should read/parse these huge files incrementally,
but that's lots of work for a debugging/introspection interface.
So for now just bump the limit.
Depends on D112793.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112794
ParseUnixMemoryProfile assumes well-formed input with \n at the end, etc.
It can over-read the input and crash on basically every line
in the case of malformed input.
ReadFileToBuffer has cap the max file size (64MB) and returns
truncated contents if the file is larger. Thus even if kernel behaves,
ParseUnixMemoryProfile crashes on too large /proc/self/smaps.
Fix input over-reading in ParseUnixMemoryProfile.
Depends on D112792.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112793
stats_size argument is unnecessary in GetMemoryProfile and in the callback.
It just clutters code. The callback knowns how many stats to expect.
Depends on D112789.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112790
Move parsing of /proc/self/smaps into a separate function
so that it can be tested.
Depends on D112788.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112789
This reverts commits
"sanitizer_common: support printing __m128i type"
and "[sanitizer] Fix VSNPrintf %V on Windows".
Unfortunately, custom "%V" is inherently incompatible with -Wformat,
it produces both:
warning: invalid conversion specifier 'V' [-Wformat-invalid-specifier]
warning: data argument not used by format string [-Wformat-extra-args]
If we disable both of these warnings we lose lots of useful warnings as well.
Depends on D107978.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107979
The __attribute__((format)) was added somewhere in 2012,
the lost during refactoring, then re-added in 2014 but
to te source files, which is a no-op.
Move it back to header files so that it actually takes effect.
But over the past 7 years we've accumulated whole lot of
format string bugs of different types, so disable the warning
with -Wno-format for now for incremental clean up.
Among the bugs that it warns about are all kinds of bad things:
- wrong sizes of arguments
- missing/excessive arguments
- printing wrong things (e.g. *ptr instead of ptr)
- completely messed up format strings
- security issues where external string is used as format
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107977
Currently we don't lock ScopedErrorReportLock around fork
and it mostly works becuase tsan has own report_mtx that
is locked around fork and tsan reports.
However, sanitizer_common code prints some own reports
which are not protected by tsan's report_mtx. So it's better
to lock ScopedErrorReportLock explicitly.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106048
We have SleepForSeconds, SleepForMillis and internal_sleep.
Some are implemented in terms of libc functions, some -- in terms
of syscalls. Some are implemented in per OS files,
some -- in libc/nolibc files. That's unnecessary complex
and libc functions cause crashes in some contexts because
we intercept them. There is no single reason to have calls to libc
when we have syscalls (and we have them anyway).
Add internal_usleep that is implemented in terms of syscalls per OS.
Make SleepForSeconds/SleepForMillis/internal_sleep a wrapper
around internal_usleep that is implemented in sanitizer_common.cpp once.
Also remove return values for internal_sleep, it's not used anywhere.
Eventually it would be nice to remove SleepForSeconds/SleepForMillis/internal_sleep.
There is no point in having that many different names for the same thing.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105718
We have some significant amount of duplication around
CheckFailed functionality. Each sanitizer copy-pasted
a chunk of code. Some got random improvements like
dealing with recursive failures better. These improvements
could benefit all sanitizers, but they don't.
Deduplicate CheckFailed logic across sanitizers and let each
sanitizer only print the current stack trace.
I've tried to dedup stack printing as well,
but this got me into cmake hell. So let's keep this part
duplicated in each sanitizer for now.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102221
This was reverted by f176803ef1 due to
Ubuntu 16.04 x86-64 glibc 2.23 problems.
This commit additionally calls `__tls_get_addr({modid,0})` to work around the
dlpi_tls_data==NULL issues for glibc<2.25
(https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19826)
GetTls is the range of
* thread control block and optional TLS_PRE_TCB_SIZE
* static TLS blocks plus static TLS surplus
On glibc, lsan requires the range to include
`pthread::{specific_1stblock,specific}` so that allocations only referenced by
`pthread_setspecific` can be scanned.
This patch uses `dl_iterate_phdr` to collect TLS blocks. Find the one
with `dlpi_tls_modid==1` as one of the initially loaded module, then find
consecutive ranges. The boundaries give us addr and size.
This allows us to drop the glibc internal `_dl_get_tls_static_info` and
`InitTlsSize` entirely. Use the simplified method with non-Android Linux for
now, but in theory this can be used with *BSD and potentially other ELF OSes.
This simplification enables D99566 for TLS Variant I architectures.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D93972#2480556 for analysis on GetTls usage
across various sanitizers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98926
GetTls is the range of
* thread control block and optional TLS_PRE_TCB_SIZE
* static TLS blocks plus static TLS surplus
On glibc, lsan requires the range to include
`pthread::{specific_1stblock,specific}` so that allocations only referenced by
`pthread_setspecific` can be scanned.
This patch uses `dl_iterate_phdr` to collect TLS ranges. Find the one
with `dlpi_tls_modid==1` as one of the initially loaded module, then find
consecutive ranges. The boundaries give us addr and size.
This allows us to drop the glibc internal `_dl_get_tls_static_info` and
`InitTlsSize` entirely. Use the simplified method with non-Android Linux for
now, but in theory this can be used with *BSD and potentially other ELF OSes.
In the future, we can move `ThreadDescriptorSize` code to lsan (and consider
intercepting `pthread_setspecific`) to avoid hacks in generic code.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D93972#2480556 for analysis on GetTls usage
across various sanitizers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98926
Userspace page aliasing allows us to use middle pointer bits for tags
without untagging them before syscalls or accesses. This should enable
easier experimentation with HWASan on x86_64 platforms.
Currently stack, global, and secondary heap tagging are unsupported.
Only primary heap allocations get tagged.
Note that aliasing mode will not work properly in the presence of
fork(), since heap memory will be shared between the parent and child
processes. This mode is non-ideal; we expect Intel LAM to enable full
HWASan support on x86_64 in the future.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98875
Than McIntosh