At the top level of program units in a source file, two subprograms
are allowed to have the same name if at least one of them has a
distinct interoperable binding name. F18's symbol table requires
(most) symbols in a scope to have distinct names, though. Solve
by using compiler-created names for the symbols of global scope
subprograms that have interoperable binding names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124295
It is generally an error when a USE-associated name clashes
with a name defined locally, but not in all cases; a generic
interface can be both USE-associated and locally defined.
This works, but not when there is also a local subprogram
with the same name, which is valid when that subprogram is
a specific of the local generic. A bogus error issues at
the point of the USE because name resolution will have already
defined a symbol for the local subprogram.
The solution is to collect the names of local generics when
creating the program tree, and then create their symbols as
well if their names are also local subprograms, prior to any
USE association processing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119566
ENTRY statement names in module subprograms were not acceptable for
use as a "module procedure" in a generic interface, but should be.
ENTRY statements need to have symbols with place-holding
SubprogramNameDetails created for them in order to be visible in
generic interfaces. Those symbols are created from the "program
tree" data structure. This patch adds ENTRY statement names to the
program tree data structure and uses them to generate SubprogramNameDetails
symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117345
Accept and represent "global" compiler directives that appear
before and between program units in a source file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86555
Peter Klausler