Implements:
- P2291R3 Add Constexpr Modifiers to Functions to_chars and from_chars for
Integral Types in <charconv> Header
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131317
Implementing the paper
P2291R3 Add Constexpr Modifiers to Functions to_chars and from_chars for
Integral Types in <charconv> Header
Gives issues in language versions prior to C++17. As suggested in
D131855 disable the code prior to C++17. This removes libc++'s
extension.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc_vendors, #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133216
This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
This is required by the Standard and makes it possible to add full
128-bit support to format.
The patch also fixes 128-bit from_chars "support". One unit test
required a too large value, this failed on 128-bit; the fix was to add
more characters to the input.
Note only base 10 has been optimized. Other bases can be optimized.
Note the 128-bit lookup table could be made smaller. This will be done later. I
really want to get 128-bit working in to_chars and format in the upcomming
LLVM 15 release, these optimizations aren't critical.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128929
This was noticed in the review of D125704. In that commit only the new
table has been adapted. This adapts the existing tables.
Note since libc++'s charconv is backported to C++11 it's not possible to
use inline constexpr variables. The were introduced in C++17.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126887
The functions to_chars and from_chars should offer 128-bit support. This
is the first step to implement 128-bit version of to_chars. Before
implementing 128-bit support the current code will be polished.
This moves the code from the dylib to the header in prepartion of
P2291 "Add Constexpr Modifiers to Functions to_chars and from_chars for
Integral Types in <charconv> Header"
Note some more cleanups will be done in follow-up commits
- Remove the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_TO_CHARS from to_chars. With all code
in the header the availablilty macro is no longer needed. This
requires enabling the unit tests for additional platforms.
- The code in the dylib can switch to using the header implementation.
This allows removing the code duplicated in the header and the dylib.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125704
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e7 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
This move the helper types `chars_format`, `to_chars_result` and
`from_chars_result` to a separate header. The first two are needed for
D70631 the third for consistency.
The header `__charconv/ryu.h` uses these types and it can't depend on the
types in `<charconv>` in a modular build. Moving them to the ryu header
would be an odd place and doesn't work since the header is included in the
middle of `<charconv>`.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108927
Mark de Wever