Using -isystem marks the headers as system headers, which means that we
don't actually get all the warnings that we'd normally get if we included
the headers as user headers.
The goal of the test suite is normally to mirror as closely as possible
how users would use the library. Technically, this change goes against
that philosophy, since users should be using `-isystem` (if they ever
need to specify the libc++ path explicitly, which should be a rare
occurence). However, I believe fishing out additional warnings from
the headers provides more value, hence this change. Ideally, we'd be
able to still use `-isystem`, but instruct Clang to still emit warnings
from the libc++ headers (e.g. we could tell Clang to emit warnings in
any file inside `<...>/usr/include/c++/v1`).
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, #libc_abi
Spies: Mordante, EricWF, mstorsjo, mgorny, aheejin, arichardson, philnik, jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118616
The NFC part of D116809. We still want to enforce this in CI,
but the mechanism for that is still to-be-determined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116809
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
The `using namespace std;` opens us up to ambiguity
when any of the std:: names are also present in the global namespace.
Instead we should properly qualify names we use from std::.
llvm-svn: 361074
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
llvm-svn: 291035
Instead, define explicit specializations for the basic types listed in
the SGI documentation. This solves two problems:
1) Helps avoid silent ODR violations caused by the absence of a
user-supplied __gnu_cxx::hash specialization in cases where a std::hash
specialization exists (e.g. for std::string).
2) __gnu_cxx::hash semantics are slightly different to those of
std::hash (for example, the former may dereference a pointer argument)
so it is inappropriate for __gnu_cxx::hash to receive std::hash
specializations by default.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2747
llvm-svn: 203070
are two motivations for this.
First, this allows users who are specializing __gnu_ext::hash to
continue doing so without changing their code.
Second, SGI specifies hash overloads for char* and const char* that
perform a hash of the string, not of the pointer.
In order to support this, the hashing code for string is factored out.
llvm-svn: 136539
Nikolas Klauser