There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d8 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
Evaluating `contiguous_iterator` on an iterator that satisfies all the
constraints except the `to_address` constraint and doesn't have
`operator->` defined results in a hard error. This is because
instantiating `to_address` ends up instantiating templates
dependent on the given type which might lead to a hard error even
in a SFINAE context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130835
This iterator is used to test code that only needs to satisfy the
output_iterator concept. Follow-up changes will use this iterator in
older language Standards.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122072
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
This follows the general direction of D118736 that
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES` does *not* guard anything outside
of the `std::ranges::` namespace itself. This means we must permit
`ranges::less` etc. in no-ranges mode; that seems fine to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120139
Fixup tests that believe them to be so. Most notably including some heavy refactoring in `std/iterators/iterator.primitives/iterator.traits/cxx20_iterator_traits.compile.pass.cpp`, which now detects pointers and validates that `iterator_concept` is present only for pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117368
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736
The renames the output_iterator to cpp17_output_iterator. These
iterators are still used in C++20 so it's not possible to change the
current type to the new C++20 requirements. This is done in a similar
fashion as the cpp17_input_iterator.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117950
As discovered in D117817, `std::ranges::input_range<Holder<Incomplete>*[10]>`
hard-errored before this patch. That's because `input_range` requires
`iter_rvalue_reference_t`, which requires `iter_move`, which was
not ADL-proofed.
Add ADL-proofing tests to all the range refinements.
`output_range` and `common_range` shouldn't be affected,
and all the others subsume `input_range` anyway, but we might as
well be thorough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118213
Move `iter_swap.pass.cpp` into a new subdirectory: `iterator.cust.swap`
for symmetry with the neighboring subdirectory `iterator.cust.move`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116992
Some individual test files verify the CPO under test satisfies
`semiregular` concept. This is redundant since it is already part of the test
in verifying whether the entity is indeed a CPO in
`libcxx/test/std/library/description/conventions/customization.point.object/cpo.compile.pass.cpp`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116173
Before this patch, we had features named 'libc++', 'libstdc++' and
'msvc' to describe the three implementations that use our test suite.
This patch renames them to 'stdlib=libc++', 'stdlib=libstdc++', etc
to avoid confusion between MSVC's STL and the MSVC compiler (or Clang
in MSVC mode).
Furthermore, this prepares the terrain for adding support for additional
"implementations" to the test suite. Basically, I'd like to be able to
treat Apple's libc++ differently from LLVM's libc++ for the purpose of
testing, because those effectively behave in different ways in some aspects.
`contiguous_iterator` requires the iterator type passed is either a
pointer type or that the element type of the iterator is a complete
object type. These constraints are not part of the current wording in
defining the `contiguous_iterator` concept - adjust the concept to
reflect this.
Inspired from discussion at https://reviews.llvm.org/D108645.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108855
Since we officially don't support several older compilers now, we can
drop a lot of the markup in the test suite. This helps keep the test
suite simple and makes sure that UNSUPPORTED annotations don't rot.
This is the first patch of a series that will remove annotations for
compilers that are now unsupported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107787
Move the tests to libcxx so they no longer need `REQUIRES: libc++`.
Verify tests don't need `REQUIRES: libc++`.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106673
cxx20_iterator_traits.compile.pass.cpp actually depends on
implementation details of libc++, which is not great;
but I just left a comment and moved on.
C++20 revised the definition of what it means to be an iterator. While
all _Cpp17InputIterators_ satisfy `std::input_iterator`, the reverse
isn't true. D100271 introduces a new test adaptor to accommodate this
new definition (`cpp20_input_iterator`).
In order to help readers immediately distinguish which input iterator
adaptor is _Cpp17InputIterator_, the current `input_iterator` adaptor
has been prefixed with `cpp17_`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101242
This reverts a224bf8ec4 and fixes the
underlying issue.
The underlying issue is simply that MSVC headers contains a define
like "#define __in", where __in is one macro in the MSVC Source
Code Annotation Language, defined in sal.h
Just use a different variable name than "__in"
__indirectly_readable_impl, and add "__in" to nasty_macros.h just
like the existing __out. (Also adding a couple more potentially
conflicting ones.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101613
In particular, `span<int>::iterator` may be a raw pointer type
and thus have no nested typedef `iterator::value_type`. However,
we already know that the value_type we expect for `span<int>` is just `int`.
Fix up all other iterator_concept_conformance tests in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101420
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100073.
Reviewed By: ldionne, zoecarver, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100080
That was originally committed in 04733181b5 and then reverted in
a9f11cc0d9 because it broke several people.
The problem was a missing include of __iterator/concepts.h, which has now
been fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
Louis Dionne