It seems these includes are still provided by the sub headers, so it only
removes the duplicates.
There is no change in the list of includes, but the change affects the
modular build. By not having the includes in the top-level header the
module map has changed. This uncovers missing includes in the tests
and missing exports in the module map. This causes the huge amount of
changes in the patch.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133252
frederick-vs-ja noticed that https://github.com/microsoft/STL/pull/2976#issuecomment-1201926893
while we are working on updating LLVM submodule for MS STL:
[...]\std\numerics\rand\rand.dist\rand.dist.samp\rand.dist.samp.discrete\eval.pass.cpp(33): error C2220: the following warning is treated as an error
[...]\std\numerics\rand\rand.dist\rand.dist.samp\rand.dist.samp.discrete\eval.pass.cpp(287): note: see reference to function template instantiation 'void tests<__int64>(void)' being compiled
[...]\std\numerics\rand\rand.dist\rand.dist.samp\rand.dist.samp.discrete\eval.pass.cpp(33): warning C4244: 'argument': conversion from '__int64' to 'const unsigned int', possible loss of data
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130963
In D125283, we ensured that integer distributions would not compile when
used with arbitrary unsupported types. This effectively enforced what
the Standard mentions here: http://eel.is/c++draft/rand#req.genl-1.5.
However, this also had the effect of breaking some users that were
using integer distributions with unsupported types like int8_t. Since we
already support using __int128_t in those distributions, it is reasonable
to also support smaller types like int8_t and its unsigned variant. This
commit implements that, adds tests and documents the extension. Note that
we voluntarily don't add support for instantiating these distributions
with bool and char, since those are not integer types. However, it is
trivial to replace uses of these random distributions on char using int8_t.
It is also interesting to note that in the process of adding tests
for smaller types, I discovered that our distributions sometimes don't
provide as faithful a distribution when instantiated with smaller types,
so I had to relax a couple of tests. In particular, we do a really bad
job at implementing the negative binomial, geometric and poisson distributions
for small types. I think this all boils down to the algorithm we use in
std::poisson_distribution, however I am running out of time to investigate
that and changing the algorithm would be an ABI break (which might be
reasonable).
As part of this patch, I also added a mitigation for a very likely
integer overflow bug we were hitting in our tests in negative_binomial_distribution.
I also filed http://llvm.org/PR56656 to track fixing the problematic
distributions with int8_t and uint8_t.
Supersedes D125283.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126823
Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482
Mark de Wever