implement `std::ranges::basic_istream_view` and `std::views::istream`. Although the view itself is constexpr,
the constructor argument is a base class std::istream where its ctor/dtor are not constexpr. So no tests are performed in
constexpr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133317
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d8 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
In the implementation of `std::views::take`, it uses `subrange<Iter>` as part of the return type. But in case of input iterator, `subrange<Iter>` can be ill-formed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133220
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
- P1252 ("Ranges Design Cleanup") -- deprecate
`move_iterator::operator->` starting from C++20; add range comparisons
to the `<functional>` synopsis. This restores
`move_iterator::operator->` that was incorrectly deleted in D117656;
it's still defined in the latest draft, see
http://eel.is/c++draft/depr.move.iter.elem. Note that changes to
`*_result` types from 6.1 in the paper are no longer relevant now that
these types are aliases;
- P2106 ("Alternative wording for GB315 and GB316") -- add a few
`*_result` types to the synopsis in `<algorithm>` (some algorithms are
not implemented yet and thus some of the proposal still cannot be
marked as done);
Also mark already done issues as done (or as nothing to do):
- P2091 ("Fixing Issues With Range Access CPOs") was already implemented
(this patch adds tests for some ill-formed cases);
- LWG 3247 ("`ranges::iter_move` should perform ADL-only lookup of
`iter_move`") was already implemented;
- LWG 3300 ("Non-array ssize overload is underconstrained") doesn't
affect the implementation;
- LWG 3335 ("Resolve C++20 NB comments US 273 and GB 274") was already
implemented;
- LWG 3355 ("The memory algorithms should support move-only input
iterators introduced by P1207") was already implemented (except for
testing).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126053
1. for constructors that takes cvref variation of tuple<UTypes...>, there
used to be two SFINAE helper _EnableCopyFromOtherTuple,
_EnableMoveFromOtherTuple. And the implementations of these two helpers
seem to slightly differ from the spec. But now, we need 4 variations.
Instead of adding another two, this change refactored it to a single one
_EnableCtrFromUTypesTuple, which directly maps to the spec without
changing the C++11 behaviour. However, we need the helper __copy_cvref_t
to get the type of std::get<i>(cvref tuple<Utypes...>) for different
cvref, so I made __copy_cvref_t to be available in C++11.
2. for constructors that takes variations of std::pair, there used to be
four helpers _EnableExplicitCopyFromPair, _EnableImplicitCopyFromPair,
_EnableImplicitMoveFromPair, _EnableExplicitMoveFromPair. Instead of
adding another four, this change refactored into two helper
_EnableCtrFromPair and _BothImplicitlyConvertible. This also removes the
need to use _nat
3. for const member assignment operator, since the requirement is very
simple, I haven't refactored the old code but instead directly adding
the new c++23 code.
4. for const swap, I pretty much copy pasted the non-const version to make
these overloads look consistent
5. while doing these change, I found two of the old constructors wasn't
marked constexpr for C++20 but they should. fixed them and added unit
tests
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116621
When merging the changes of <type_traits> header with the commits on
this header over the last month, several conflicts were mistaken
resolved and the wrong branch was picked while resolving conflicts,
which leads to CI failure. In order to resolve the conflicts properly
with qualification CI job, this change is reverted.
This reverts commit 95733a55b9.
1. for constructors that takes cvref variation of tuple<UTypes...>, there
used to be two SFINAE helper _EnableCopyFromOtherTuple,
_EnableMoveFromOtherTuple. And the implementations of these two helpers
seem to slightly differ from the spec. But now, we need 4 variations.
Instead of adding another two, this change refactored it to a single one
_EnableCtrFromUTypesTuple, which directly maps to the spec without
changing the C++11 behaviour. However, we need the helper __copy_cvref_t
to get the type of std::get<i>(cvref tuple<Utypes...>) for different
cvref, so I made __copy_cvref_t to be available in C++11.
2. for constructors that takes variations of std::pair, there used to be
four helpers _EnableExplicitCopyFromPair, _EnableImplicitCopyFromPair,
_EnableImplicitMoveFromPair, _EnableExplicitMoveFromPair. Instead of
adding another four, this change refactored into two helper
_EnableCtrFromPair and _BothImplicitlyConvertible. This also removes the
need to use _nat
3. for const member assignment operator, since the requirement is very
simple, I haven't refactored the old code but instead directly adding
the new c++23 code.
4. for const swap, I pretty much copy pasted the non-const version to make
these overloads look consistent
5. while doing these change, I found two of the old constructors wasn't
marked constexpr for C++20 but they should. fixed them and added unit
tests
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116621
For an lvalue reference to a move only view x, views::all(x) gives hard error because the expression inside noexcept is not well formed and it is not SFINAE friendly.
Given a move only view type `V`, and a concept
```
template <class R>
concept can_all = requires {
std::views::all(std::declval<R>());
};
```
The expression `can_all<V&>` returns
libstdc++: false
msvc stl : false
libc++ : error: static_cast from 'V' to 'typename decay<decltype((std::forward<V &>(__t)))>::type' (aka 'V') uses deleted function
noexcept(noexcept(_LIBCPP_AUTO_CAST(std::forward<_Tp>(__t))))
The standard spec has its own problem, the spec says it is expression equivalent to `decay-copy(E)` but the spec of `decay-copy` does not have any constraint, which means the expression `decay-copy(declval<V&>())` is well-formed and the concept `can_all<V&>` should return true and should error when instantiating the function body of decay-copy. This is clearly wrong behaviour in the spec and we will probably create an LWG issue. But the libc++'s behaviour is clearly not correct. The `noexcept` is an "extension" in libc++ which is not in the spec, but the expression inside `noexpect` triggers hard error, which is not right.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128281
This removes all "TODO: remove these headers" comments from our headers.
Note there seem to be more headers that can be removed, that will be
done in separate commits.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127592
The compilers clang-11, clang-12, and apple-clang-12 are no longer
supported, so remove their annotations in the tests.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127588
The tests for `std::ranges::lazy_split_view` heavily use a wrapper class around
`std::string` because `std::string` was not `constexpr` until recently. Where
possible, remove the wrapper class and extra functionality no longer needed.
Remove `libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/small_string.h`
and inline its one use remaining in
`libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/general.pass.cpp`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126663
This only adds the customization point object (which isn't pipeable),
the view itself has already been implemented previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124978
- add zip_view and views::zip for C++23
- added unit tests
- implemented section 5.6 (zip) in P2321R2
I used clang-format to format the files but they look nothing like the rest of the code base. Manually indenting each line to match the styles sounds like an impossible task. Is there any clang-format file which can format it reasonable similar to the rest of the code base so that I can manually format the rest lines that look weird?
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik, var-const
Spies: Mordante, philnik, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122806
- added views::join adaptor object
- added test for the adaptor object
- fixed some join_view's tests. e.g iter_swap test
- added some negative tests for join_view to test that operations do not exist when constraints aren't met
- added tests that locks down issues that were already addressed in previous change
- LWG3500 `join_view::iterator::operator->()` is bogus
- LWG3313 `join_view::iterator::operator--` is incorrectly constrained
- LWG3517 `join_view::iterator`'s `iter_swap` is underconstrained
- P2328R1 join_view should join all views of ranges
- fixed some issues in join_view and added tests
- LWG3535 `join_view::iterator::iterator_category` and `::iterator_concept` lie
- LWG3474 Nesting ``join_views`` is broken because of CTAD
- added tests for an LWG issue that isn't resolved in the standard yet, but the previous code has workaround.
- LWG3569 Inner iterator not default_initializable
Reviewed By: #libc, var-const
Spies: var-const, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123466
Note that this class was called just `split_view` in the original One
Ranges Proposal and was renamed to `lazy_split_view` by
[P2210](https://wg21.link/p2210).
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107500
[libc++] add global variable template std::views::empty
Note it is neither a range adaptor, nor a CPO. It is simplify a global variable template.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122996
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
Zero-sized types are a GCC extension, also supported by Clang.
In theory it's already invalid to `delete` a void pointer or a
pointer-to-incomplete, so we shouldn't need any special code
to catch those cases; but in practice Clang accepts both
constructs with just a warning, and GCC even accepts `sizeof(void)`
with just a warning! So we must keep the static_asserts.
The hard errors are tested in `unique_ptr_dltr_dflt/*.compile.fail.cpp`.
In ranges::begin/end, check `sizeof >= 0` instead of `sizeof != 0`,
so as to permit zero-sized types while still disallowing incomplete
types.
Fixes#54100.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120633
Change the tests to use the base friend function instead of members.
Also changed some types to have a base friends instead of members.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120742
It actually *is* important (for structured bindings) that `get(tuple)`
be ADL-able; but that's not the point of this test in particular.
Reviewed as part of D119860.
As suggested in D117966.
These conditional noexcepts are *permitted* by the Standard (as long
as there were no mistakes in them, I guess); but not *mandated*.
The Standard doesn't put any noexcept-specifications on these member functions.
The same logic would apply to `transform_view::iterator::operator*`
and `transform_view::iterator::operator[]`, but the Standard mandates
conditional noexcept on `iter_move(transform_view::iterator)`, and
I think it doesn't make much sense to say "moving from this iterator
is conditionally noexcept but not-moving from it is noexcept(false),"
so I'm leaving transform_view alone for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119374
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736
- add some test cases for `cbegin`/`cend`;
- make class definitions generally follow the order in which they are
used;
- add a missing include.
Reviewed By: philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119214
var-const points out that `ranges::begin` is (non-normatively
but explicitly) always supposed to return a `std::input_or_output_iterator`,
and `Incomplete*` is not a `std::input_or_output_iterator` because it
has no `operator++`. Therefore, we should never return `Incomplete*`
from `ranges::begin(x)`, even when `x` is `Incomplete(&)[]`. Instead,
just SFINAE away.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118963
The renames the output_iterator to cpp17_output_iterator. These
iterators are still used in C++20 so it's not possible to change the
current type to the new C++20 requirements. This is done in a similar
fashion as the cpp17_input_iterator.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117950
As discovered in D117817, `std::ranges::input_range<Holder<Incomplete>*[10]>`
hard-errored before this patch. That's because `input_range` requires
`iter_rvalue_reference_t`, which requires `iter_move`, which was
not ADL-proofed.
Add ADL-proofing tests to all the range refinements.
`output_range` and `common_range` shouldn't be affected,
and all the others subsume `input_range` anyway, but we might as
well be thorough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118213
Hui Xie