Addresses LWG 3548 which mandates that when shared_ptr is being constructed from a unique_ptr, the unique_ptr's deleter should be moved and not copied.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119159
This reverts commit 276ca873. That commit has quite a history at this
point. It was first landed in dbc647643577, which broke std::shared_ptr<T const>
and was reverted in 9138666f5. It was then re-applied in 276ca873, with
the std::shared_ptr issue fixed, but it caused widespread breakage at
Google (which suggests it would cause similar breakage in the wild too),
so now I'm reverting again.
Instead, I will add a escape hatch that vendors can turn on to enable
the extension and perform a phased transition over one or two releases
like we sometimes do when things become non-trivial.
This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.
This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.
This is a re-application of dbc647643577, which was reverted in 9138666f5
because it broke std::shared_ptr<T const>. Tests have now been added and
we've made sure that std::shared_ptr<T const> wouldn't be broken in this
version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996
Make test_allocator etc. constexpr-friendly so they can be used to test constexpr string and possibly constexpr vector
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110994
Also fix a few places in the `shared_ptr` implementation where
`element_type` was passed to the `__is_compatible` helper. This could
result in `remove_extent` being applied twice to the pointer's template
type (first by the definition of `element_type` and then by the helper),
potentially leading to somewhat less readable error messages for some
incorrect code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112092
The only possible kind of a conversion in initialization of a shared
pointer to an array is a qualification conversion (i.e., adding
cv-qualifiers). This patch adds tests for converting from `A[]` to
`const A[]` to the following functions:
```
template<class Y> explicit shared_ptr(Y* p);
template<class Y> shared_ptr(const shared_ptr<Y>& r);
template<class Y> shared_ptr(shared_ptr<Y>&& r);
template<class Y> shared_ptr& operator=(const shared_ptr<Y>& r);
template<class Y> shared_ptr& operator=(shared_ptr<Y>&& r);
template<class Y> void reset(Y* p);
template<class Y, class D> void reset(Y* p, D d);
template<class Y, class D, class A> void reset(Y* p, D d, A a);
```
Similar tests for converting functions that involve a `weak_ptr` should
be added once LWG issue [3001](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3001)
is implemented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112048
All supported compilers have supported deduction guides in C++17 for a
while, so this isn't necessary anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108213
This patch fixes LWG2874. It is based on the original patch by Zoe Carver
originally uploaded at D81417.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81417
This patch implements 2802. Requires _Deleter to have call operator and be move constructible. Based on D62233.
Refs PR37637.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62274
- Several -Wshadow warnings
- Several places where we did not initialize our base class explicitly
- Unused variable warnings
- Some tautological comparisons
- Some places where we'd pass null arguments to functions expecting
non-null (in unevaluated contexts)
- Add a few pragmas to turn off spurious warnings
- Fix warnings about declarations that don't declare anything
- Properly disable deprecation warnings in ext/ tests (the pragmas we
were using didn't work on GCC)
- Disable include_as_c.sh.cpp because GCC complains about C++ flags
when compiling as C. I couldn't find a way to fix this one properly,
so I'm disabling the test. This isn't great, but at least we'll be
able to enable warnings in the whole test suite with GCC.
We don't support GCC in C++03 mode, and Clang provides rvalue references
even in C++03 mode. So there's effectively no supported compiler that
doesn't support rvalue references.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84943
Add shared_ptr tests where the element type and pointer type aren't 'convertible' but are 'compatible'.
Responding to a comment from D81414.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81532
All compilers supported by libc++ have rvalues in C++03 mode so, there is no need for this non-rvalue overload.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80881
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
* improve coverage in `span`'s "conversion from `std::array`" test, while eliminating MSVC diagnostics about `testConstructorArray<T>() && testConstructorArray<const T, T>()` being redundant when `T` is already `const`.
* Remove use of `is_assignable` that triggers UB due to an insufficiently-complete type argument in `std::function`'s assignment operator test.
* Don't test that `shared_ptr` initialization from an rvalue triggers the lvalue aliasing constructor on non-libc++; this is not the case for Standard Libraries that implement LWG-2996. (Ditto, I'd simply remove this but it's your library ;).)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80030
Implements P0414R2:
* Adds support for array types in std::shared_ptr.
* Adds reinterpret_pointer_cast for shared_ptr.
Re-committing now that the leaking tests are fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62259
Implements P0414R2:
* Adds support for array types in std::shared_ptr.
* Adds reinterpret_pointer_cast for shared_ptr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62259
This patch adds deduction guides to <memory> to allow deducing
construction of shared_ptrs from unique_ptrs, and from weak_ptrs
and vice versa, as specified by C++17.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69603
Instead of having different names for the same Lit feature accross code
bases, use the same name everywhere. This NFC commit is in preparation
for a refactor where all three projects will be using the same Lit
feature detection logic, and hence it won't be convenient to use
different names for the feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78370
Summary:
Android's libc uses new/delete internally and these are counted, so
the counter needs to be reset to zero at the start of the test.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, #libc, ldionne
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76091
Summary:
In r342843, I added deprecation warnings to some facilities that were
deprectated in C++14 and C++17. However, those deprecation warnings
were not enabled by default.
After discussing this on IRC, we had finally gotten consensus to enable
those warnings by default, and I'm getting around to doing that only
now.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58140
llvm-svn: 355961
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
This is a follow up of D24562.
These tests do not check anything but exceptions, so it makes sense to mark
them as UNSUPPORTED under a library built without exceptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26075
llvm-svn: 285550
Nikolas Klauser