Familiar story, callers are either checking upfront that the pointer
wasn't null or not checking at all. SetValueFromData itself didn't
check either.
So make the parameter a ref and fixup the few places where a nullptr
check seems needed.
Depends on D135668
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135670
LLVM contains a helpful function for getting the size of a C-style
array: `llvm::array_lengthof`. This is useful prior to C++17, but not as
helpful for C++17 or later: `std::size` already has support for C-style
arrays.
Change call sites to use `std::size` instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133501
Using GetTargetArchitecture() instead of m_target_arch, and set m_target_arch to private.
Reviewed By: DavidSpickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132353
Suppress coverity false positives.
This diff contains comments only, including the hints for Coverity static code inspection
to suppress the warning originating at the next line after the comment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131998
Add:
- `EmulateInstructionRISCV`, which can be used for riscv32 and riscv64.
- Add unittests for EmulateInstructionRISCV.
Note: Compressed instructions set (RVC) was still not supported in this patch.
Reviewed By: DavidSpickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131759
Some architectures do not have a flag register (like riscv).
In this case, we should set it to `baton.m_register_values.end()` to avoid nullptr exception.
Reviewed By: DavidSpickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131945
This patch improve exception reporting when loading a crash report in a
scripted process. Now, we parse the `exception` dictionary from the
crash report use it the create a higher fidelity `MachException` stop info.
This patch also updates the test to reflect that change.
rdar://97096486
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131086
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This patch is based on the minimal extract of D128250.
What is implemented:
- Use the same register layout as Linux kernel and mock read/write for `x0` register (the always zero register).
- Refactor some duplicate code, and delete unused register definitions.
Reviewed By: DavidSpickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130342
We don't want the DEFINE_ macros or the array registers
being clang formatted.
RegisterInfos_arm64.h was missing the off annotation and
RegisterInfos_arm64_sve.h needed the off moving to before
the macro definitions.
Jason noted that the stop message we print for a memory high water mark
notification (EXC_RESOURCE) could be clearer. Currently, the stop
reason looks like this:
* thread #3, queue = 'com.apple.CFNetwork.LoaderQ', stop reason =
EXC_RESOURCE RESOURCE_TYPE_MEMORY (limit=14 MB, unused=0x0)
It's hard to read the message because the exception and the type
(EXC_RESOURCE RESOURCE_TYPE_MEMORY) blend together. Additionally, the
"observed=0x0" should not be printed for memory limit exceptions.
I wanted to continue to include the resource type from
<kern/exc_resource.h> while also explaining what it actually is. I used
the wording from the comments in the header. With this path, the stop
reason now looks like this:
* thread #5, stop reason = EXC_RESOURCE (RESOURCE_TYPE_MEMORY: high
watermark memory limit exceeded) (limit=14 MB)
rdar://40466897
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131130
The kernel was rejecting sizeof(struct GPR) as it was not a multiple of
8. Add a padding field to fix that.
One also wonders whether "cpsr" is right register name for aarch64.
Currently, lldb-server was opening the executable file to determine the
process architecture (to differentiate between 32 and 64 bit
architecture flavours). This isn't a particularly trustworthy source of
information (the file could have been changed since the process was
started) and it is not always available (file could be deleted or
otherwise inaccessible).
Unfortunately, ptrace does not give us a direct API to access the
process architecture, but we can still infer it via some of its
responses -- given that the general purpose register set of 64-bit
applications is larger [citation needed] than the GPR set of 32-bit
ones, we can just ask for the application GPR set and check its size.
This is what this patch does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130985
Fixing potential int overflow and uninitialized variables.
These were found by Coverity static code inspection.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130795
This is the first part of support for reading MTE tags from Linux
core files. The format is documented here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.html#core-dump-support
This patch adds a method to unpack from the format the core
file uses, which is different to the one chosen for GDB packets.
MemoryTagManagerAArch64MTE is not tied one OS so another OS
might choose a different format in future. However, infrastructure
to handle that would go untested until then so I've chosen not to
attempt to handle that.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129487
Fix modernize-use-override warnings. Because this check is listed in
LLDB's top level .clang-tidy configuration, the check is enabled by
default and the resulting warnings show up in my editor.
I've audited the modified lines. This is not a blind change.
Move them to the only source file that included RegisterInfos_arm64.h
that actually used these variables.
This silences warnings like these:
In file included from lldb/source/Plugins/Instruction/ARM64/EmulateInstructionARM64.cpp:42:
lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/RegisterInfos_arm64.h:790:35: warning: ‘g_register_infos_mte’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
790 | static lldb_private::RegisterInfo g_register_infos_mte[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/RegisterInfos_arm64.h:787:35: warning: ‘g_register_infos_pauth’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
787 | static lldb_private::RegisterInfo g_register_infos_pauth[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123206
Currently, all data buffers are assumed to be writable. This is a
problem on macOS where it's not allowed to load unsigned binaries in
memory as writable. To be more precise, MAP_RESILIENT_CODESIGN and
MAP_RESILIENT_MEDIA need to be set for mapped (unsigned) binaries on our
platform.
Binaries are mapped through FileSystem::CreateDataBuffer which returns a
DataBufferLLVM. The latter is backed by a llvm::WritableMemoryBuffer
because every DataBuffer in LLDB is considered to be writable. In order
to use a read-only llvm::MemoryBuffer I had to split our abstraction
around it.
This patch distinguishes between a DataBuffer (read-only) and
WritableDataBuffer (read-write) and updates LLDB to use the appropriate
one.
rdar://74890607
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122856
Most of our code was including Log.h even though that is not where the
"lldb" log channel is defined (Log.h defines the generic logging
infrastructure). This worked because Log.h included Logging.h, even
though it should.
After the recent refactor, it became impossible the two files include
each other in this direction (the opposite inclusion is needed), so this
patch removes the workaround that was put in place and cleans up all
files to include the right thing. It also renames the file to LLDBLog to
better reflect its purpose.
This reverts commit ef82063207.
- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLExtras, which will now
never be called.
- Calling it without llvm:: breaks C++17 compat
This is to be used when you want to know what subranges
of a larger range have memory tagging. Like MakeTaggedRange
but memory without tags is skipped and you get a list of ranges back.
Will be used later by DumpDataExtractor to show memory tags.
MakeTaggedRanges assumes that the memory regions it is
given are sorted in ascending order and do not overlap.
For the current use case where you get regions from
GetMemoryRegions and are on some Linux like OS, this is
reasonable to assume.
I've used asserts to check those conditions. In future
any API binding will check them up front to prevent a crash.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112824
This better describes the intent of the method. Which for AArch64
is removing the top byte which includes the memory tags.
It does not include pointer signatures, for those we need to use
the ABI plugin. The rename makes this a little more clear.
It's a bit awkward that the memory tag manager is removing the whole
top byte not just the memory tags but it's an improvement for now.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117671
This is a re-submission of 24d2405588
without the hunks in HostNativeThreadBase.{h,cpp}, which break builds
on Windows.
Identified with modernize-use-nullptr.
This reverts commit 913457acf0.
It again broke builds on Windows:
lldb/source/Host/common/HostNativeThreadBase.cpp(37,14): error:
assigning to 'lldb::thread_result_t' (aka 'unsigned int') from
incompatible type 'std::nullptr_t'
This is a re-submission of 24d2405588
without the hunk in HostNativeThreadBase.h, which breaks builds on
Windows.
Identified with modernize-use-nullptr.
This reverts commit 24d2405588.
Breaks building on Windows:
../../lldb/include\lldb/Host/HostNativeThreadBase.h(49,36): error:
cannot initialize a member subobject of type 'lldb::thread_result_t'
(aka 'unsigned int') with an rvalue of type 'std::nullptr_t'
lldb::thread_result_t m_result = nullptr;
^~~~~~~
1 error generated.
GDB and LLDB use different signal models. GDB uses a predefined set
of signal codes, and maps platform's signos to them. On the other hand,
LLDB has historically simply passed native signos.
In order to improve compatibility between LLDB and gdbserver, the GDB
signal model should be used. However, GDB does not provide a mapping
for all existing signals on Linux and unsupported signals are passed
as 'unknown'. Limiting LLDB to this behavior could be considered
a regression.
To get the best of both worlds, use the LLDB signal model when talking
to lldb-server, and the GDB signal model otherwise. For this purpose,
new versions of lldb-server indicate "native-signals+" via qSupported.
At the same time, we also detect older versions of lldb-server
via QThreadSuffixSupported for backwards compatibility. If neither test
succeeds, we assume gdbserver or another implementation using GDB model.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108078
Fix incorrect values for value_regs, and incomplete values for
invalidate_regs in RegisterInfos_arm. The value_regs entry needs
to list only one base (i.e. larger) register that needs to be read
to get the value for this register, while invalidate_regs needs to list
all other registers (including pseudo-register) whose values would
change when this register is written to.
7a8ba4ffbe fixed a similar problem
for ARM64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112066
Add a FPU_QREG macro to define qN registers. This is a piece-wise
attempt of reconstructing D112066 with the goal of figuring out which
part of the larger change breaks the buildbot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112066
Use FPU_REG macro to define dN registers, removing the wrong value_regs
while at it. This is a piece-wise attempt of reconstructing D112066
with the goal of figuring out which part of the larger change breaks
the buildbot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112066
This is a piece-wise attempt of reconstructing D112066 with the goal
of figuring out which part of the larger change breaks the buildbot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112066
Fix incorrect values for value_regs, and incomplete values for
invalidate_regs in RegisterInfos_arm. The value_regs entry needs
to list only one base (i.e. larger) register that needs to be read
to get the value for this register, while invalidate_regs needs to list
all other registers (including pseudo-register) whose values would
change when this register is written to.
While at it, introduce helper macros for the definitions.
7a8ba4ffbe fixed a similar problem
for ARM64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112066
The previous version of the patch did not update the definitions in
conditionally compiled code. This patch includes changes to ARC and
windows targets.
Original commit message was:
These were added to support some mips registers on linux, but linux mips
support has now been removed due.
They are still referenced in the freebds mips implementation, but the
completeness of that implementation is also unknown. All other
architectures just set these fields to zero, which is a cause of
significant bloat in our register info definitions.
Arm also has registers with variable sizes, but they were implemented in
a more gdb-compatible fashion and don't use this feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110914
This reverts commit 00e704bf08.
This commit should should have updated
llvm/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/ABI/ARC/ABISysV_arc.cpp like the other
architectures.
These were added to support some mips registers on linux, but linux mips
support has now been removed due.
They are still referenced in the freebds mips implementation, but the
completeness of that implementation is also unknown. All other
architectures just set these fields to zero, which is a cause of
significant bloat in our register info definitions.
Arm also has registers with variable sizes, but they were implemented in
a more gdb-compatible fashion and don't use this feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110914
Move DynamicRegisterInfo from the internal lldbPluginProcessUtility
library to the public lldbTarget library. This is a prerequisite
towards ABI plugin changes that are going to pass DynamicRegisterInfo
parameters.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110942
David Spickett