GetUnitDIEPtrOnly() needs to return pointer to the first DIE.
But the first element of m_die_array after ExtractDIEsIfNeeded(true)
may move in memory after later ExtractDIEsIfNeeded(false).
DWARFDebugInfoEntry::collection m_die_array is std::vector,
its data may move during its expansion.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46810
llvm-svn: 333437
Summary:
We were treating subprograms and inlined subroutines differently when
building the index. The difference was in which indexes were individual
tags inserted (subprograms went to all indexes, where as inlined
subroutines only into the basename and full name indexes).
This seems like an error, because an inlined subroutine can still
represent an C++ or an ObjC method. I don't see anything in the
subprogram branch which should not apply to an inlined subroutine, so I
propose to just treat them identically. This makes searching for an
inlined method behave the same way as for the apple index.
I write an assembly-based test because I did not want to depend on
particular clang inlining behavior (and because I wanted to see how hard
would it be).
Reviewers: clayborg, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: eraman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47368
llvm-svn: 333398
Several functions were passing a list of 8 NameToDIE arguments around.
This puts those variables in a struct and passes that instead, reducing
code duplication and the possibility of error (swapping two arguments
accidentally).
llvm-svn: 333264
Summary:
I think this makes sense for several reasons:
- better separation of concerns: DWARFUnit's job should be to provide a
nice interface to its users to access the unit contents.
ManualDWARFIndex can then use this interface to build an index and
provide it to its users.
- closer alignment with llvm parsers: there is no indexing equivalent in
llvm, and there probably never will be, as the index is very centered
around how lldb wants to access debug info. If we ever switch to
llvm's parser, this will allow us swap out DWARFUnit implementations
and keep indexing as-is.
- closer proximity of the indexing code to AppleDWARFIndex will make it
easier to keep the two in sync (e.g. right now the two use very
different algorithms to determine whether a DW_TAG_subroutine
represents a "method"). This is my primary motivation for making this
change now, but I am leaving this work to a separate patch.
The only interface change to DWARFUnit I needed to make was to add an
efficient way to iterate over the list of all DIEs. Adding this also
aligns us closer to the llvm parser.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, aprantl
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47253
llvm-svn: 333178
Summary:
This places the `if(m_using_apple_tables)` branches inside the
SymbolFileDWARF class behind an abstract DWARFIndex class. The class
currently has two implementations:
- AppleIndex, which searches using .apple_names and friends
- ManualIndex, which searches using a manually built index
Most of the methods of the class are very simple, and simply extract the
list of DIEs for the given name from the appropriate sub-table. The main
exception are the two GetFunctions overloads, which take a couple of
extra paramenters, including some callbacks. It was not possible to
split these up the same way as other methods, as here we were doing a
lot of post-processing on the results. The post-processing is similar
for the two cases, but not identical. I hope to factor these further in
separate patches.
Other interesting methods are:
- Preload(): do any preprocessing to make lookups faster (noop for
AppleIndex, forces a build of the lookup tables for ManualIndex).
- ReportInvalidDIEOffset(): Used to notify the users of an invalid index
(prints a message for AppleIndex, noop for ManualIndex).
- Dump(): dumps the index state (noop for AppleIndex, prints the lookup
tables for ManualIndex).
Reviewers: clayborg, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgorny, aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46889
llvm-svn: 332719
Jan Kratochvil