D25618 added a method to verify the instruction predicates for an
emitted instruction, through verifyInstructionPredicates added into
<Target>MCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction. This is a very useful idea,
but the implementation inside MCCodeEmitter made it only fire for object
files, not assembly which most of the llvm test suite uses.
This patch moves the code into the <Target>_MC::verifyInstructionPredicates
method, inside the InstrInfo. The allows it to be called from other
places, such as in this patch where it is called from the
<Target>AsmPrinter::emitInstruction methods which should trigger for
both assembly and object files. It can also be called from other places
such as verifyInstruction, but that is not done here (it tends to catch
errors earlier, but in reality just shows all the mir tests that have
incorrect feature predicates). The interface was also simplified
slightly, moving computeAvailableFeatures into the function so that it
does not need to be called externally.
The ARM, AMDGPU (but not R600), AVR, Mips and X86 backends all currently
show errors in the test-suite, so have been disabled with FIXME
comments.
Recommitted with some fixes for the leftover MCII variables in release
builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129506
This reverts commit e2fb8c0f4b as it does
not build for Release builds, and some buildbots are giving more warning
than I saw locally. Reverting to fix those issues.
D25618 added a method to verify the instruction predicates for an
emitted instruction, through verifyInstructionPredicates added into
<Target>MCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction. This is a very useful idea,
but the implementation inside MCCodeEmitter made it only fire for object
files, not assembly which most of the llvm test suite uses.
This patch moves the code into the <Target>_MC::verifyInstructionPredicates
method, inside the InstrInfo. The allows it to be called from other
places, such as in this patch where it is called from the
<Target>AsmPrinter::emitInstruction methods which should trigger for
both assembly and object files. It can also be called from other places
such as verifyInstruction, but that is not done here (it tends to catch
errors earlier, but in reality just shows all the mir tests that have
incorrect feature predicates). The interface was also simplified
slightly, moving computeAvailableFeatures into the function so that it
does not need to be called externally.
The ARM, AMDGPU (but not R600), AVR, Mips and X86 backends all currently
show errors in the test-suite, so have been disabled with FIXME
comments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129506
There was an issue with encoding wide (>64 bit) instructions on
BigEndian hosts, which is fixed in D127195. Therefore reland this.
gfx11 adds the ability to use dpp modifiers on vop3 instructions.
This patch adds machine code layer support for that. The MCCodeEmitter
is changed to use APInt instead of uint64_t to support these wider
instructions.
Patch 16/N for upstreaming of AMDGPU gfx11 architecture
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126483
gfx11 adds the ability to use dpp modifiers on vop3 instructions.
This patch adds machine code layer support for that. The MCCodeEmitter
is changed to use APInt instead of uint64_t to support these wider
instructions.
Patch 16/N for upstreaming of AMDGPU gfx11 architecture
Depends on D126475
Reviewed By: rampitec, #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126483
There's a few relevant forward declarations in there that may require downstream
adding explicit includes:
llvm/MC/MCContext.h no longer includes llvm/BinaryFormat/ELF.h, llvm/MC/MCSubtargetInfo.h, llvm/MC/MCTargetOptions.h
llvm/MC/MCObjectStreamer.h no longer include llvm/MC/MCAssembler.h
llvm/MC/MCAssembler.h no longer includes llvm/MC/MCFixup.h, llvm/MC/MCFragment.h
Counting preprocessed lines required to rebuild llvm-project on my setup:
before: 1052436830
after: 1049293745
Which is significant and backs up the change in addition to the usual benefits of
decreasing coupling between headers and compilation units.
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119244
NFC. This check does not verify any functional property since size 8
was added. Remove it for simplicity.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111737
Change-Id: Ifd7cbd324a137f939d8dc04acb8fbd54c9527a42
These instructions should allow src0 to be a literal with the same
value as the mandatory other literal. Enable it by introducing an
operand that defers adding its value to the MI when decoding till
the mandatory literal is parsed.
Reviewed By: dp, foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111067
Change-Id: I22b0ae0d35bad17b6f976808e48bffe9a6af70b7
Add SReg_224, VReg_224, AReg_224, etc.
Link 224-bit types with v7i32/v7f32.
Link existing 192-bit types to newly added v3i64/v3f64/v6i32/v6f32.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104622
These two instructions are VOP3P and have op_sel_hi bits,
however do not use op_sel_hi. That is recommended to set
unused op_sel_hi bits to 1. However, we cannot decode
both representations with 1 and 0 if bits are set to
default value 1. If bits are set to be ignored with '?'
initializer then encoding defaults them to 0.
The patch is a hack to force ignored '?' bits to 1 on
encoding for these instructions.
There is still canonicalization happens on disasm print
if incoming values are non-default, so that disasm output
does not match binary input, but this is pre-existing
problem for all instructions with '?' bits.
Fixes: SWDEV-272540
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96543
As mentioned in TODO comment, casting double to float causes NaNs to change bits.
To avoid the change, this patch adds support for single-floating-point immediate value on MachineCode.
Patch by Yuta Saito.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77384
It's more future-proof to use isGFX10Plus from the start, on the
assumption that future architectures will be based on current
architectures.
Also make use of the existing isGFX9Plus in a few places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92092
It seems to be a hardware defect that the half inline constants do not
work as expected for the 16-bit integer operations (the inverse does
work correctly). Experimentation seems to show these are really
reading the 32-bit inline constants, which can be observed by writing
inline asm using op_sel to see what's in the high half of the
constant. Theoretically we could fold the high halves of the 32-bit
constants using op_sel.
The *_asm_all.s MC tests are broken, and I don't know where the script
to autogenerate these are. I started manually fixing it, but there's
just too many cases to fix. This also does break the
assembler/disassembler support for these values, and I'm not sure what
to do about it. These are still valid encodings, so it seems like you
should be able to use them in some way. If you wrote assembly using
them, you could have really meant it (perhaps to read the high bits
with op_sel?). The disassembler will print the invalid literal
constant which will fail to re-assemble. The behavior is also
different depending on the use context. Consider this example, which
was previously accepted and encoded using the inline constant:
v_mad_i16 v5, v1, -4.0, v3
; encoding: [0x05,0x00,0xec,0xd1,0x01,0xef,0x0d,0x04]
In contexts where an inline immediate is required (such as on gfx8/9),
this will now be rejected. For gfx10, this will produce the literal
encoding and change the printed format:
v_mad_i16 v5, v1, 0xc400, v3
; encoding: [0x05,0x00,0x5e,0xd7,0x01,0xff,0x0d,0x04,0x00,0xc4,0x00,0x00]
This is just another variation of the issue that we don't perfectly
handle round trip assembly/disassembly due to not tracking how
immediates were encoded. This doesn't matter much in practice, since
compilers don't emit the suboptimal encoding. I doubt any users are
relying on this behavior (although I did make use of the old behavior
to figure out what was wrong).
Fixes bug 46302.
Add 96-bit, 160-bit and 256-bit AReg classes to match VReg and SReg.
NFC as far as I know, but it may avoid weird legalization problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78348
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
We now have two sets of generated TableGen files, one for R600 and one
for GCN, so each sub-target now has its own tables of instructions,
registers, ISel patterns, etc. This should help reduce compile time
since each sub-target now only has to consider information that
is specific to itself. This will also help prevent the R600
sub-target from slowing down new features for GCN, like disassembler
support, GlobalISel, etc.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle, jvesely
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: MatzeB, kzhuravl, wdng, mgorny, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46365
llvm-svn: 335942
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
This was failing on out of bounds access to the extra operands
on the s_swappc_b64 beyond those in the instruction definition.
This was working, but somehow regressed within the past few weeks,
although I don't see any obvious commit.
llvm-svn: 309782
The intention of processFixupValue is not to redefine the semantics of
MCExpr. It is odd enough that a expression lowers to a PCRel MCExpr or
not depending on what it looks like. At least it is a local hack now.
I left a fix for anyone trying to figure out what producers should be
producing a different expression.
llvm-svn: 306200
Summary: Previously there were two separate pseudo instruction for SDWA on VI and on GFX9. Created one pseudo instruction that is union of both of them. Added verifier to check that operands conform either VI or GFX9.
Reviewers: dp, arsenm, vpykhtin
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, artem.tamazov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34026
llvm-svn: 305886
Summary:
Added separate pseudo and real instruction for GFX9 SDWA instructions.
Currently supports only in assembler.
Depends D32493
Reviewers: vpykhtin, artem.tamazov
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33132
llvm-svn: 303620
The operand types were defined to fit the fp16_to_fp node, which
has the half as an integer type. v_cvt_f32_f16 does support
source modifiers, so change this to have an FP type and modifiers.
For targets without legal f16, this requires recognizing the
bit operations and trying to produce them.
llvm-svn: 293857