R1 is a reserved register, but LLVM gives the APIs to know when it is
used or not. So this patch uses these APIs to only save/clear/restore R1
in interrupts when necessary.
The main issue here was getting inline assembly to work. One could argue
that this is the job of Clang, but for consistency I've made sure that
R1 is always usable in inline assembly even if that means clearing it
when it might not be needed.
Information on inline assembly in AVR can be found here:
https://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/inline_asm.html#asm_code
Essentially, this seems to suggest that r1 can be freely used in avr-gcc
inline assembly, even without specifying it as an input operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117426
The code to support the case when the register allocator has assigned
the same register to the src and the dst register operand isn't actually
needed:
* LDWRdPtr and LDDWRdPtrQ have an @earlyclobber on the output
register, so the register allocator will make sure to allocate a
different register for the output register.
* LDDWRdYQ does not have an @earlyclobber, but the pointer register is
the fixed Y register which is reserved. The register allocator won't
use reserved registers for the output value.
This removes a special case in the code that makes the pseudo
instruction expansion pass more complicated than it needs to be.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131844
Currently, STDSPQRr and STDWSPQRr are expanded only during
AVRFrameLowering - this means that if any of those instructions happen
to appear _outside_ of the typical FrameSetup / FrameDestroy
context, they wouldn't get substituted, eventually leading to a crash:
```
LLVM ERROR: Not supported instr: <MCInst XXX <MCOperand Reg:1>
<MCOperand Imm:15> <MCOperand Reg:53>>
```
This commit fixes this issue by moving expansion of those two opcodes
into AVRExpandPseudo.
This bug was originally discovered due to the Rust compiler_builtins
library. Its 0.1.37 release contained a 128-bit software
division/remainder routine that exercised this buggy branch in the code.
Reviewed By: benshi001
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123528
This commit contains a refactoring that merges AVRRelaxMemOperations
into AVRExpandPseudoInsts, so that we have a single place in code that
expands the STDWPtrQRr opcode.
Seizing the day, I've also fixed a couple of potential bugs with our
previous implementation (e.g. when the destination register was killed,
the previous implementation would try to .addDef() that killed
register, crashing LLVM in the process - that's fixed now, as proved by
the test).
Reviewed By: benshi001
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122533
This patch fixes the atomicrmw result value to be the value before the
operation instead of the value after the operation. This was a bug, left
as a FIXME in the code (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D97127).
From the LangRef:
> The contents of memory at the location specified by the <pointer>
> operand are atomically read, modified, and written back. The original
> value at the location is returned.
Doing this expansion early allows the register allocator to arrange
registers in such a way that commutable operations are simply swapped
around as needed, which results in shorter code while still being
correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117725
Skip operation on the lower byte in int16 logical left shift when
shift amount is greater than 8.
Skip operation on the higher byte in int16 logical & arithmetic
right shift when shift amount is greater than 8.
Reviewed By: aykevl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115594
The current inconsistency confuse contributors which coding guidlines to follow.
It would be better to have it consistent using clang-format tool.
Reviewed By: mhjacobson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109270
This patch fixes some issues with the RORB pseudo instruction.
- A minor issue in which the instructions were said to use the SREG,
which is not true.
- An issue with the BLD instruction, which did not have an output operand.
- A major issue in which invalid instructions were generated. The fix
also reduce RORB from 4 to 3 instructions, so it's also a small
optimization.
These issues were flagged by the machine verifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96957
There were some serious issues with atomic operations. This patch should
fix the biggest issues.
For details on the issue take a look at this Compiler Explorer sample:
https://godbolt.org/z/n3ndhn
Code:
void atomicadd(_Atomic char *val) {
*val += 5;
}
Output:
atomicadd:
movw r26, r24
ldi r24, 5 ; 'operand' register
in r0, 63
cli
ld r24, X ; load value
add r24, r26 ; value += X
st X, r24 ; store value back
out 63, r0
ret ; return the wrong value (in r24)
There are various problems with this.
- The value to add (5) is stored in r24. However, the value to add to
is loaded in the same register: r24.
- The `add` instruction adds half of the pointer to the loaded value,
instead of (attempting to) add the operand with value 5.
- The output value of the cmpxchg instruction (which is not used in
this code sample) is the new value with 5 added, not the old value.
The LangRef specifies that it has to be the old value, before the
operation.
This patch fixes the first two and leaves the third problem to be fixed
at a later date. I believe atomics were mostly broken before this patch,
with this patch they should become usable as long as you ignore the
output of the atomic operation. In particular it fixes the following
things:
- It sets the earlyclobber flag for the input ('$operand' operand) so
that the register allocator puts it in a different register than the
output value.
- It fixes a number of issues with the pseudo op expansion pass, for
example now it adds the $operand field instead of the pointer. This
fixes most machine instruction verifier issues (other flagged issues
are unrelated to atomics).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97127
This patch is a large number of small changes that should hopefully not
affect the generated machine code but are still important to get right
so that the machine verifier won't complain about them.
The llvm/test/CodeGen/AVR/pseudo/*.mir changes are also necessary
because without the liveins the used registers are considered undefined
by the machine verifier and it will complain about them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97172
Some instructions (especially mov+pop instructions) were setting the
wrong operands. For example, the pop instruction had the register set as
a source operand while it is a destination operand (the value is loaded
into the register).
I have found these issues using the machine verifier and using manual
code inspection.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97159
The previous expansion used SBCI, which is incorrect because the NEGW
pseudo instruction accepts a DREGS operand (2xGPR8) and SBCI only allows
LD8 registers. One solution could be to correct the NEGW pseudo
instruction, but another solution is to use a different instruction
(sbc) that does accept a GPR8 register and therefore allows more freedom
to the register allocator.
The output now matches avr-gcc for the following code:
int foo(int n) {
return -n;
}
I've found this issue using the machine instruction verifier: it was
complaining about the wrong register class in NEGWRd.mir.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97131
Summary:
LDRdPtr expanded from LDWRdPtr shouldn't define its second operand(SrcReg).
The second operand is its source register.
Add -verify-machineinstrs into command line of testcases can trigger this error.
Reviewers: dylanmckay
Reviewed By: dylanmckay
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75437
Summary:
This patch introduces the ROLBRd and RORBRd pseudo-instructions,
which implemenent the "traditional" rotate operations; instead of
the AVR rotate instructions that use the carry bit.
The code is not optimized at all. Especially when dealing with
loops of rotate instructions, this codegen should be improved some
day.
Related bug: 41358 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41358>
//Note//: This is my first submitted patch.
Reviewers: dylanmckay, Jim
Reviewed By: dylanmckay
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, dylanmckay, dsprenkels
Tags: #llvm
Patched by dsprenkels (Daan Sprenkels)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60365
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
Prior to this patch, the AVR::LDWRdPtr instruction was always lowered to
instructions of this pattern:
ld $GPR8, [PTR:XYZ]+
ld $GPR8, [PTR]+1
This has a problem; the [PTR] is incremented in-place once, but never
decremented.
Future uses of the same pointer will use the now clobbered value,
leading to the pointer being incorrect by an offset of one.
This patch modifies the expansion code of the LDWRdPtr pseudo
instruction so that the pointer variable is not silently clobbered in
future uses in the same live range.
Bug first reported by Keshav Kini.
Patch by Kaushik Phatak.
llvm-svn: 351673
This reverts commit r351544.
In that commit, I had mistakenly misattributed the issue submitter as
the patch author, Kaushik Phatak.
The patch will be recommitted immediately with the correct attribution.
llvm-svn: 351672
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Prior to this patch, the AVR::LDWRdPtr instruction was always lowered to
instructions of this pattern:
ld $GPR8, [PTR:XYZ]+
ld $GPR8, [PTR]+1
This has a problem; the [PTR] is incremented in-place once, but never
decremented.
Future uses of the same pointer will use the now clobbered value,
leading to the pointer being incorrect by an offset of one.
This patch modifies the expansion code of the LDWRdPtr pseudo
instruction so that the pointer variable is not silently clobbered in
future uses in the same live range.
Patch by Keshav Kini.
llvm-svn: 351544
The 'rol Rd' instruction is equivalent to 'adc Rd'.
This caused compile warnings from tablegen because of conflicting bits
shared between each instruction.
llvm-svn: 341275
a generically extensible collection of extra info attached to
a `MachineInstr`.
The primary change here is cleaning up the APIs used for setting and
manipulating the `MachineMemOperand` pointer arrays so chat we can
change how they are allocated.
Then we introduce an extra info object that using the trailing object
pattern to attach some number of MMOs but also other extra info. The
design of this is specifically so that this extra info has a fixed
necessary cost (the header tracking what extra info is included) and
everything else can be tail allocated. This pattern works especially
well with a `BumpPtrAllocator` which we use here.
I've also added the basic scaffolding for putting interesting pointers
into this, namely pre- and post-instruction symbols. These aren't used
anywhere yet, they're just there to ensure I've actually gotten the data
structure types correct. I'll flesh out support for these in
a subsequent patch (MIR dumping, parsing, the works).
Finally, I've included an optimization where we store any single pointer
inline in the `MachineInstr` to avoid the allocation overhead. This is
expected to be the overwhelmingly most common case and so should avoid
any memory usage growth due to slightly less clever / dense allocation
when dealing with >1 MMO. This did require several ergonomic
improvements to the `PointerSumType` to reasonably support the various
usage models.
This also has a side effect of freeing up 8 bits within the
`MachineInstr` which could be repurposed for something else.
The suggested direction here came largely from Hal Finkel. I hope it was
worth it. ;] It does hopefully clear a path for subsequent extensions
w/o nearly as much leg work. Lots of thanks to Reid and Justin for
careful reviews and ideas about how to do all of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50701
llvm-svn: 339940
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
In some cases, the code generator attempts to generate instructions such as:
lddw r24, Y+63
which expands to:
ldd r24, Y+63
ldd r25, Y+64 # Oops! This is actually ld r25, Y in the binary
This commit limits the first offset to 62, and thus the second to 63.
It also updates some asserts in AVRExpandPseudoInsts.cpp, including for
INW and OUTW, which appear to be unused.
Patch by Thomas Backman.
llvm-svn: 314890
Rename from addOperand to just add, to match the other method that has been
added to MachineInstrBuilder for adding more than just 1 operand.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D28057 for the whole discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28556
llvm-svn: 291891
Summary: This gets rid of the hardcoded 'r0' that was used previously.
Reviewers: asl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27567
llvm-svn: 289322
These should've been checking whether the immediate is a 6-bit unsigned
integer.
If the immediate was '63', this would cause an assertion error which
shouldn't have occurred.
llvm-svn: 289315
Ayke van Laethem