avoiding an assertion.
A BB with a nonzero count, whose successor blocks all have 0 counts, could
cause an assertion. Don't create any branch weights in this case.
Reviewed By: xur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134203
This was reverted because it was breaking when targeting Darwin which
tried to export these symbols which are now hidden. It should be safe
to just stop attempting to export these symbols in the clang driver,
though Apple folks will need to change their TAPI allow list described
in the commit where these symbols were originally exported
f538018562
Bug: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58265
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135340
Update both memprof and callsite metadata to reflect inlined functions.
For callsite metadata this is simply a concatenation of each cloned
call's call stack with that of the inlined callsite's.
For memprof metadata, each profiled memory info block (MIB) is either
moved to the cloned allocation call or left on the original allocation
call depending on whether its context matches the newly refined call
stack context on the cloned call. We also reapply context trimming
optimizations based on the refined set of contexts on each of the calls
(cloned and original), via utilities in MemoryProfileInfo.
Depends on D128142.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128143
See also related RFCs:
RFC: Sanitizer-based Heap Profiler [1]
RFC: A binary serialization format for MemProf [2]
RFC: IR metadata format for MemProf [3]*
* Note that the IR metadata format has changed from the RFC during
implementation, as described in the preceeding patch adding the basic
metadata and verification support.
The matching is performed during the normal PGO annotation phase, to
ensure that the inlines applied in the IR at that point are a subset
of the inlines in the profiled binary and thus reflected in the
profile's call stacks. This is important because the call frames are
associated with functions in the profile based on the inlining in the
symbolized call stacks, and this simplifies locating the subset of
profile data relevant for matching onto each function's IR.
The PGOInstrumentationUse pass is enhanced to perform matching for
whatever combination of memprof and regular PGO profile data exists in
the profile.
Using the utilities introduced in D128854:
The memprof profile data for each context is converted to "cold" or
"notcold" based on parameterized thresholds for size, access count, and
lifetime. The memprof allocation contexts are trimmed to the minimal
amount of context required to uniquely identify whether the context is
cold or not cold. For allocations where all profiled contexts have the
same allocation type, no memprof metadata is attached and instead the
allocation call is directly annotated with an attribute specifying the
alloction type. This is the same attributed that will be applied to
allocation calls once cloned for different contexts, and later used
during LibCall simplification to emit allocation hints [4].
Depends on D128141 and D128854.
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-June/142744.html
[2] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-September/153007.html
[3] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-ir-metadata-format-for-memprof/59165
[4] ab87cf382d
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128142
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134254 introduced an issue on Fuchsia
target, which does not unconditionally emit runtime hook.
It used containsProfilingIntrinsics(M) after intrinsics are lowered.
So, this patch fixes the issue by capturing the result of that
function invocation before intrinsics are lowered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134841
This reverts commit 794b7ea960, and
thus restores commit a212d8da94, and
follow on fixes 0cd6763fa9,
e9ff53d42f, and
37c6a25e9a.
Use a hash function (BLAKE3) instead of hash_combine/hash_code which are
not guaranteed to be stable across executions.
Additionally, it adds a "REQUIRES: x86_64-linux" to the tests that have
raw profile inputs to avoid failures on big endian bots.
Reviewers: snehasish, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128142
This reverts commit a212d8da94, and follow
on fixes 0cd6763fa9,
e9ff53d42f, and
37c6a25e9a.
After re-reading the documentation for hash_combine, I don't think this
is the appropriate hash function to use for computing the hash to use as
a stack id in the metadata, since it is not guaranteed to produce stable
values across executions. I have not hit this problem, but plan to
switch to using an MD5 hash. I am hitting an issue with one of the bots
(https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/171/builds/20732)
where the values produced are only the lower 32 bits of the expected
hash values, however, which I assume is related to the implementation of
hash_combine and hash_code.
I believe I fixed all of the other bot failures with the follow on fixes,
which I'll merge into the new version before reapplying.
Profile matching and IR annotation for memprof profiles.
See also related RFCs:
RFC: Sanitizer-based Heap Profiler [1]
RFC: A binary serialization format for MemProf [2]
RFC: IR metadata format for MemProf [3]*
* Note that the IR metadata format has changed from the RFC during
implementation, as described in the preceeding patch adding the basic
metadata and verification support.
The matching is performed during the normal PGO annotation phase, to
ensure that the inlines applied in the IR at that point are a subset
of the inlines in the profiled binary and thus reflected in the
profile's call stacks. This is important because the call frames are
associated with functions in the profile based on the inlining in the
symbolized call stacks, and this simplifies locating the subset of
profile data relevant for matching onto each function's IR.
The PGOInstrumentationUse pass is enhanced to perform matching for
whatever combination of memprof and regular PGO profile data exists in
the profile.
Using the utilities introduced in D128854:
The memprof profile data for each context is converted to "cold" or
"notcold" based on parameterized thresholds for size, access count, and
lifetime. The memprof allocation contexts are trimmed to the minimal
amount of context required to uniquely identify whether the context is
cold or not cold. For allocations where all profiled contexts have the
same allocation type, no memprof metadata is attached and instead the
allocation call is directly annotated with an attribute specifying the
alloction type. This is the same attributed that will be applied to
allocation calls once cloned for different contexts, and later used
during LibCall simplification to emit allocation hints [4].
Depends on D128141 and D128854.
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-June/142744.html
[2] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-September/153007.html
[3] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-ir-metadata-format-for-memprof/59165
[4] ab87cf382d
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128142
Instrumentation just ORs shadow of inputs.
I assume some result shadow bits can be reset if we go into specifics of particular checks,
but as-is it is still an improvement against existing default strict instruction handler, when
every set bit of input shadow is reported as an error.
Reviewed By: kda
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134123
Msan has default handler for unknown instructions which
previously applied to these as well. However depending on
mask, not all pointers or passthru part will be used. This
allows other passes to insert undef into sum arguments.
As result, default strict instruction handler can produce false reports.
Reviewed By: kda, kstoimenov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133678
This is a reland of https://reviews.llvm.org/D122336.
Original patch caused a problem in collecting coverage in
Fuchsia because it was returning early without putting unused
function names into __llvm_prf_names section. This patch
fixes that issue.
The original commit message is as the following:
CoverageMappingModuleGen generates a coverage mapping record
even for unused functions with internal linkage, e.g.
static int foo() { return 100; }
Clang frontend eliminates such functions, but InstrProfiling pass
still emits runtime hook since there is a coverage record.
Fuchsia uses runtime counter relocation, and pulling in profile
runtime for unused functions causes a linker error:
undefined hidden symbol: __llvm_profile_counter_bias.
Since https://reviews.llvm.org/D98061, we do not hook profile
runtime for the binaries that none of its translation units
have been instrumented in Fuchsia. This patch extends that for
the instrumented binaries that consist of only unused functions.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122336
According to logs, ClInstrumentationWithCallThreshold is workaround
for slow backend with large number of basic blocks.
However, I can't reproduce that one, but I see significant slowdown
after ClCheckConstantShadow. Without ClInstrumentationWithCallThreshold
compiler is able to eliminate many of the branches.
So maybe we should drop ClInstrumentationWithCallThreshold completly.
For now I just change the logic to ignore constant shadow so it will
not trigger callback fallback too early.
Reviewed By: kstoimenov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133880
TargetLibraryInfo isn't optional, so we have to provide it even with the
lageacy stuff. Ideally we wouldn't need it anymore but there are still
users out there that are stuck on the legacy PM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133685
If multiple warnings created on the same instruction (debug location)
it can be difficult to figure out which input value is the cause.
This patches chains origins just before the warning using last origins
update debug information.
To avoid inflating the binary unnecessarily, do this only when uncertainty is
high enough, 3 warnings by default. On average it adds 0.4% to the
.text size.
Reviewed By: kda, fmayer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133232
GlobalsAA is considered stateless as usually transformations do not introduce
new global accesses, and removed global access is not a problem for GlobalsAA
users.
Sanitizers introduce new global accesses:
- Msan and Dfsan tracks origins and parameters with TLS, and to store stack origins.
- Sancov uses global counters. HWAsan store tag state in TLS.
- Asan modifies globals, but I am not sure if invalidation is required.
I see no evidence that TSan needs invalidation.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133394
Introduces the SanitizerBinaryMetadata instrumentation pass which uses
the new MD_pcsections metadata kinds to instrument certain types of
instructions and functions required for breakpoint-based sanitizers.
The first intended user of the binary metadata emitted will be a variant
of GWP-TSan [1]. GWP-TSan will require information about atomic
accesses; to unambiguously determine if an access is atomic or not, we
also require "covered" information which code has been compiled with
SanitizerBinaryMetadata instrumentation enabled.
[1] https://llvm.org/devmtg/2020-09/slides/Morehouse-GWP-Tsan.pdf
Reviewed By: dvyukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130887
After https://reviews.llvm.org/rG463aa814182a23 tsan replaces llvm
intrinsics with calls to glibc functions. However this approach is
fragile, as slight changes in pipeline can return llvm intrinsics back.
In particular InstCombine can do that.
Msan/Asan already declare own version of these memory
functions for the similar purpose.
KCSAN, or anything that uses something else than compiler-rt, needs to
implement this callbacks.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133268
After https://reviews.llvm.org/rG463aa814182a23 tsan replaces llvm
intrinsics with calls to glibc functions. However this approach is
fragile, as slight changes in pipeline can return llvm intrinsics back.
In particular InstCombine can do that.
Msan/Asan already declare own version of these memory
functions for the similar purpose.
KCSAN, or anything that uses something else than compiler-rt, needs to
implement this callbacks.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133268
When we want to add instrumentation after
an instruction, instrumentation still should
keep debug info of the instruction.
Reviewed By: kda, kstoimenov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133091
We currently instrument CallBrInst but do not annotate it with
the branch weight. This patch enables PGO annotation of CallBrInst.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133040
Reduces .text size by 1% on our large binary.
On CTMark (-O2 -fsanitize=memory -fsanitize-memory-use-after-dtor -fsanitize-memory-param-retval)
Size -0.4%
Time -0.8%
Reviewed By: kda
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133071
Matthias Braun