The constant expression used in the test will become invalid in
the future. Convert the input into bitcode, so we test that auto-
upgrade happens gracefully once this is the case.
We should not be using APIs here that try to fetch the attribute
from both the call attributes and the function attributes. Otherwise
we'll try to upgrade a non-existent sret attribute on the call using
the attribute on the function.
We only support chunks <= 32 bits regardless of whether we're
running on a 64-bit platform or not. Chunk size > 32 <= 64 would
cause UB in the reading code.
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
These checks already exist as asserts when creating the corresponding
instruction. Anybody creating these instructions already need to take
care to not break these checks.
Move the checks for success/failure ordering in cmpxchg from the
verifier to the LLParser and BitcodeReader plus an assert.
Add some tests for cmpxchg ordering. The .bc files are created from the
.ll files with an llvm-as with these checks disabled.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102803
I think byval/sret and the others are close to being able to rip out
the code to support the missing type case. A lot of this code is
shared with inalloca, so catch this up to the others so that can
happen.
Currently the backend special cases x86_intrcc and treats the first
parameter as byval. Make the IR require byval for this parameter to
remove this special case, and avoid the dependence on the pointee
element type.
Fixes bug 46672.
I'm not sure the IR is enforcing all the calling convention
constraints. clang seems to ignore the attribute for empty parameter
lists, but the IR tolerates it.
Summary:
The upgrading path from old ModuleFlag based linker options to the new
NamedMetadata based linker option in in materializeMetadata() which gets
called once for the module and once for every GV. The linker options are
getting dup'ed every time and it can create massive amount of the linker
options in the object file that gets created from old bitcode. Fix the
problem by checking if the new option exists or not before upgrade
again.
rdar://64543389
Reviewers: pcc, t.p.northover, dexonsmith, arphaman
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: hiraditya, jkorous, ributzka, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83688
Summary:
If bitcode reader gets an invalid branch weight, drop that from the
inputs. This allows us to read the broken modules we generated before
the verifier was able to catch this.
rdar://64870641
Reviewers: yrouban, t.p.northover, dexonsmith, arphaman, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, jkorous, ributzka, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83699
This recommits r365750 (git commit 8b222ecf27)
Original message:
Currently invalid bitcode files can cause a crash, when OpNum exceeds
the number of elements in Record, like in the attached bitcode file.
The test case was generated by clusterfuzz: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=15698
Reviewers: t.p.northover, thegameg, jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64507
llvm-svn: 365750jkkkk
llvm-svn: 366018
Currently invalid bitcode files can cause a crash, when OpNum exceeds
the number of elements in Record, like in the attached bitcode file.
The test case was generated by clusterfuzz: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=15698
Reviewers: t.p.northover, thegameg, jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64507
llvm-svn: 365750
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.
If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.
The original commit did not remap byval types when linking modules, which broke
LTO. This version fixes that.
Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.
llvm-svn: 362128
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.
If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.
Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.
llvm-svn: 362012
Summary:
Reapply r357931 with fixes to ThinLTO testcases and llvm-lto tool.
ThinLTOCodeGenerator currently does not preserve llvm.used symbols and
it can internalize them. In order to pass the necessary information to the
legacy ThinLTOCodeGenerator, the input to the code generator is
rewritten to be based on lto::InputFile.
Now ThinLTO using the legacy LTO API will requires data layout in
Module.
"internalize" thinlto action in llvm-lto is updated to run both
"promote" and "internalize" with the same configuration as
ThinLTOCodeGenerator. The old "promote" + "internalize" option does not
produce the same output as ThinLTOCodeGenerator.
This fixes: PR41236
rdar://problem/49293439
Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc, kromanova, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: ormris, bd1976llvm, mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, hiraditya, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60421
llvm-svn: 358601
r342631 expanded bitc::METADATA_LOCATION by one element. The bitcode
metadata loader was changed in a backwards-incompatible way, leading to
crashes when disassembling old bitcode:
assertion: empty() && "PlaceholderQueue hasn't been flushed before being destroyed"
Assertion failed: (empty() && "PlaceholderQueue hasn't been flushed before being destroyed")
This commit teaches the metadata loader to assume that the newly-added
IsImplicitCode bit is 'false' when not present in old bitcode. I've added a
bitcode compat regression test.
rdar://44645820
llvm-svn: 342678
Summary:
To allow bitcode built by old compiler to pass the current verifer,
BitcodeReader needs to auto infer the correct runtime preemption from
linkage and visibility for GlobalValues.
Since llvm-6.0 bitcode already contains the new field but can be
incorrect in some cases, the attribute needs to be recomputed all the
time in BitcodeReader. This will make all the GVs has dso_local marked
correctly if read from bitcode, and it should still allow the verifier
to catch mistakes in optimization passes.
This should fix PR38009.
Reviewers: sfertile, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49039
llvm-svn: 336560
Summary: For SamplePGO, we already record the callsite count in the call instruction itself. So we do not want to use BFI to get profile count as it is less accurate.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl, eraman
Reviewed By: eraman
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36025
llvm-svn: 309964
This interface allows clients to write multiple modules to a single
bitcode file. Also introduce the llvm-cat utility which can be used
to create a bitcode file containing multiple modules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26179
llvm-svn: 288195
As proposed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/106595.html
This change also fixes an API oddity where BitstreamCursor::Read() would
return zero for the first read past the end of the bitstream, but would
report_fatal_error for subsequent reads. Now we always report_fatal_error
for all reads past the end. Updated clients to check for the end of the
bitstream before reading from it.
I also needed to add padding to the invalid bitcode tests in
test/Bitcode/. This is because the streaming interface was not checking that
the file size is a multiple of 4.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26219
llvm-svn: 285773
Summary:
This patch improves thinlto importer
by importing 3x larger functions that are called from hot block.
I compared performance with the trunk on spec, and there
were about 2% on povray and 3.33% on milc. These results seems
to be consistant and match the results Teresa got with her simple
heuristic. Some benchmarks got slower but I think they are just
noisy (mcf, xalancbmki, omnetpp)- running the benchmarks again with
more iterations to confirm. Geomean of all benchmarks including the noisy ones
were about +0.02%.
I see much better improvement on google branch with Easwaran patch
for pgo callsite inlining (the inliner actually inline those big functions)
Over all I see +0.5% improvement, and I get +8.65% on povray.
So I guess we will see much bigger change when Easwaran patch will land
(it depends on new pass manager), but it is still worth putting this to trunk
before it.
Implementation details changes:
- Removed CallsiteCount.
- ProfileCount got replaced by Hotness
- hot-import-multiplier is set to 3.0 for now,
didn't have time to tune it up, but I see that we get most of the interesting
functions with 3, so there is no much performance difference with higher, and
binary size doesn't grow as much as with 10.0.
Reviewers: eraman, mehdi_amini, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24638
llvm-svn: 282437
Nikita Popov