Based on D130896, we can model operand bundles more precisely. In
addition to the baseline ModRefBehavior, a reading/clobbering operand
bundle may also read/write all locations. For example, a memcpy with
deopt bundle can read any memory, but only write argument memory.
This means that getModRefInfo() for memcpy with a pointer that does
not alias the arguments results in Ref, rather than ModRef, without
the need to implement any special handling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130980
This is the first patch in a series intended for removing flag
-enable-new-pm=0 from lit tests. This is part of a bigger
effort of completely removing legacy code related to legacy
pass manager in favor of currently default new pass manager.
In this patch flag has been removed only from tests where no significant
change has been required because checks has been duplicated for
both PMs.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134150
Add a visibility check for dllimport and dllexport. Note: dllimport with a
non-default visibility (implicit dso_local) is already rejected, but with a less
clear dso_local error.
The MC level visibility `MCSA_Exported` (D123951) is mapped from IR level
default visibility when dllexport is specified. The D123951 error is now very
difficult to trigger (needs to disable the IR verifier).
Reviewed By: mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133267
WinEHPrepare marks any function call from EH funclets as unreachable, if it's not a nounwind intrinsic or has no proper funclet bundle operand. This
affects ARC intrinsics on Windows, because they are lowered to regular function calls in the PreISelIntrinsicLowering pass. It caused silent binary truncations and crashes during unwinding with the GNUstep ObjC runtime: https://github.com/gnustep/libobjc2/issues/222
This patch adds a new function `llvm::IntrinsicInst::mayLowerToFunctionCall()` that aims to collect all affected intrinsic IDs.
* Clang CodeGen uses it to determine whether or not it must emit a funclet bundle operand.
* PreISelIntrinsicLowering asserts that the function returns true for all ObjC runtime calls it lowers.
* LLVM uses it to determine whether or not a funclet bundle operand must be propagated to inlined call sites.
Reviewed By: theraven
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128190
The legacy LoopUnswitch pass is only used in the legacy pass manager
pipeline, which is deprecated.
The NewPM replacement is SimpleLoopUnswitch and I think it is time to
remove the legacy LoopUnswitch code.
Fixes#31000.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, Meinersbur, asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124376
Some generic tests are not supported by the nvptx now. Moreover, they
are no plans to fix the tested features in nvptx. So, suggest to mark
them as UNSUPPORTED
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123928
This removes support for the legacy pass manager in llvm-lto and
llvm-lto2. In this case I've dropped the use-new-pm option entirely,
as I don't think this is considered part of the public interface.
This also makes -debug-pass-manager work with llvm-lto, because
that was needed to migrate some tests to NewPM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123376
If we have a writeonly function called from a callsite with a potentially reading operand bundle, we can not conclude the callsite is writeonly.
The changed test is the only one I've been able to demonstrate a current miscompile on, but an incorrect result here could show up in a bunch of subtle ways. For instance, this issue caused several spurious test changes when combined with D117591.
This fixes a bug in 740057d. There's two ways to describe the issue:
* One caller hasn't yet proven nocapture on the argument. Given that, the inference routine is responsible for bailing out on a potential capture.
* Even if we know the argument is nocapture, the access inference needs to traverse the exact set of users the capture tracking would (or exit conservatively). Even if capture tracking can prove a store is non-capturing (e.g. to a local alloc which doesn't escape), we still need to track the copy of the pointer to see if it's later reloaded and accessed again.
Note that all the test changes except the newly added ones appear to be false negatives. That is, cases where we could prove writeonly, but the current code isn't strong enough. That's why I didn't spot this originally.
This change extends the current logic for inferring readonly and readnone argument attributes to also infer writeonly.
This change is deliberately minimal; there's a couple of areas for follow up.
* I left out all call handling and thus any benefit from the SCC walk. When examining the test changes, I realized the existing code is imprecise, and am going to fix that in it's own revision before adding in the writeonly handling. (Mostly because updating the tests is hard when I, the human, can't figure out whether the result is correct.)
* I left out handling for storing a value (as opposed to storing to a pointer). This should benefit readonly/readnone as well, and applies to a bunch of other instructions. Seemed worth having as a separate review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114963
Simply use the new PM syntax instead of the deprecated legacy PM
syntax when specifying the opt pipeline in some regression tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114518
In both ADCE and BDCE (via DemandedBits) we should not remove
instructions that are not guaranteed to return. This issue was
pointed out by fhahn in the recent llvm-dev thread.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96993
tut-simplify-cfg hasn't been ported to the new PM.
llvm-lto2's -enable-new-pm defaults to the CMake flag, so the legacy PM extension test needs to be pinned.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95898
With the addition of the `willreturn` attribute, functions that may
not return (e.g. due to an infinite loop) are well defined, if they are
not marked as `willreturn`.
This patch updates `wouldInstructionBeTriviallyDead` to not consider
calls that may not return as dead.
This patch still provides an escape hatch for intrinsics, which are
still assumed as willreturn unconditionally. It will be removed once
all intrinsics definitions have been reviewed and updated.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94106
Some targets may add required passes via
TargetMachine::registerPassBuilderCallbacks(). We need to run those even
under -O0. As an example, BPFTargetMachine adds
BPFAbstractMemberAccessPass, a required pass.
This also allows us to clean up BackendUtil.cpp (and out-of-tree Rust
usage of the NPM) by allowing us to share added passes like coroutines
and sanitizers between -O0 and other optimization levels.
Since callbacks may end up not adding passes, we need to check if the
pass managers are empty before adding them, so PassManager now has an
isEmpty() function. For example, polly adds callbacks but doesn't always
add passes in those callbacks, so this is necessary to keep
-debug-pass-manager tests' output from changing depending on if polly is
enabled or not.
Tests are a continuation of those added in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89083.
Reviewed By: asbirlea, Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89158
This allows those instrumentation to log when they decide to skip a
pass. This provides extra helpful info for optnone functions and also
will help with opt-bisect.
Have OptNoneInstrumentation print when it skips due to seeing optnone.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90545
D70365 allows us to make attributes default. This is a follow up to
actually make nosync, nofree and willreturn default. The approach we
chose, for now, is to opt-in to default attributes to avoid introducing
problems to target specific intrinsics. Intrinsics with default
attributes can be created using `DefaultAttrsIntrinsic` class.
This pass is like DeadCodeEliminationPass, but only does one pass
through a function instead of iterating on users of eliminated
instructions.
DeadCodeEliminationPass should be used in all cases.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87933
As discussed in D86843, -earlycse-debug-hash should be used in more regression
tests to catch inconsistency between the hashing and the equivalence check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86863
This was done by turning on -enable-npm-optnone and fixing failures.
That will be enabled in a follow-up change for ease of reverting.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85457
If OptNoneInstrumentation prints it instead, 'Skipping pass' will print for even required passes.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85493
No verification for pass mangers since it is not needed.
No verification for skipped loop pass since the asserted condition is not used.
Add a BeforeNonSkippedPass callback for this. The callback needs more
inputs than its parameters to work so the callback is added on-the-fly.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84977
To match NewPM pass name, and also for readability.
Also rename rpo-functionattrs -> rpo-function-attrs while we're here.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84694
OptNoneInstrumentation is part of StandardInstrumentations. It skips
functions (or loops) that are marked optnone.
The feature of skipping optional passes for optnone functions under NPM
is gated on a -enable-npm-optnone flag. Currently it is by default
false. That is because we still need to mark all required passes to be
required. Otherwise optnone functions will start having incorrect
semantics. After that is done in following changes, we can remove the
flag and always enable this.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83519
This is D77454, except for stores. All the infrastructure work was done
for loads, so the remaining changes necessary are relatively small.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79968
For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the
datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR
later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the
datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default
datalayout.
The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow
overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this,
some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target.
Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new
machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the
datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information
from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools
to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time.
Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback.
(clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at
least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a
datalayout is not something frontends should generate.
This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen
regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with
a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the
overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the
default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one
AMDGPU test.
Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just
fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
Windows doesn't properly support pass plugins (as a shared library
can't have undefined references, which pass plugins assume, being
loaded into a host process that contains provides them), thus
disable building it and the corresponding test.
This matches what was done for the passes unit test in
bc8e442188.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79771
This should make both static and dynamic NewPM plugins work with LTO.
And as a bonus, it makes static linking of OldPM plugins more reliable
for plugins with both an OldPM and NewPM interface.
I only implemented the command-line flag to specify NewPM plugins in
llvm-lto2, to show it works. Support can be added for other tools later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76866
The LoopExtractor created new functions (by definition), which violates
the restrictions of a LoopPass.
The correct implementation of this pass should be as a ModulePass.
Includes reverting rL82990 implications on the LoopExtractor.
Fixes PR3082 and PR8929.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69069
This behavior appears to have changed unintentionally in
b0e979724f.
Instead of printing the leading newline in printFunction, print it when
printing a module. This ensures that `OS << *Func` starts printing
immediately on the current line, but whole modules are printed nicely.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73505
Arthur Eubanks