The "isa" checks were less constrained because they allow
target constants, but the later matching code would bail
out on those anyway, so this should be slightly more
efficient.
This patch changes SplitVecOp_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT to work correctly
for scalable vectors and also fixes an a bug in DAGCombiner where
the scalable property is dropped in visitTRUNCATE when attempting
to fold an extract + a truncate.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85754
In DAGTypeLegalizer::GenWidenVectorStores the algorithm assumes it only
ever deals with fixed width types, hence the offsets for each individual
store never take 'vscale' into account. I've changed the main loop in
that function to use TypeSize instead of unsigned for tracking the
remaining store amount and offset increment. In addition, I've changed
the loop to use the new IncrementPointer helper function for updating
the addresses in each iteration, since this handles scalable vector
types.
Whilst fixing this function I also fixed a minor issue in
IncrementPointer whereby we were not adding the no-unsigned-wrap flag
for the add instruction in the same way as the fixed width case does.
Also, I've added a report_fatal_error in GenWidenVectorTruncStores,
since this code currently uses a sequence of element-by-element scalar
stores.
I've added new tests in
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-intrinsics-stores.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-st1-addressing-mode-reg-imm.ll
for the changes in GenWidenVectorStores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84937
In narrowExtractedVectorLoad there is an optimisation that tries to
combine extract_subvector with a narrowing vector load. At the moment
this produces warnings due to the incorrect calls to
getVectorNumElements() for scalable vector types. I've got this
working for scalable vectors too when the extract subvector index
is a multiple of the minimum number of elements. I have added a
new variant of the function:
MachineFunction::getMachineMemOperand
that copies an existing MachineMemOperand, but replaces the pointer
info with a null version since we cannot currently represent scaled
offsets.
I've added a new test for this particular case in:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-extract-subvector.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83950
In this patch I have fixed two issues:
1. Our SVE tuple get/set intrinsics were using the wrong constant type
for the index passed to EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR. I have fixed this by using the
function SelectionDAG::getVectorIdxConstant to create the value. Also, I
have updated the documentation for EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR describing what type
the constant index should be and we now enforce this when creating the
node.
2. The AArch64 backend was missing the appropriate patterns for
extracting certain subvectors (nxv4f16 and nxv2f32) from legal SVE types.
I have added them as part of this patch.
The only way that I could find to test the new patterns was to use the
SVE tuple get intrinsics, although I realise it looks a bit unusual.
Tests added here:
test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-extract-subvector.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85516
When the result type of insertelement needs to be split,
SplitVecRes_INSERT_VECTOR_ELT will try to store the vector to a
stack temporary, store the element at the location of the stack
temporary plus the index, and reload the Lo/Hi parts.
This patch does the following to ensure this works for scalable vectors:
- Sets the StackID with getStackIDForScalableVectors() in CreateStackTemporary
- Adds an IsScalable flag to getMemBasePlusOffset() and scales the
offset by VScale when this is true
- Ensures the immediate is clamped correctly by clampDynamicVectorIndex
so that we don't try to use an out of range index
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84874
Changes the Offset arguments to both functions from int64_t to TypeSize
& updates all uses of the functions to create the offset using TypeSize::Fixed()
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85220
These aren't the canonical forms we'd get from InstCombine, but
we do have X86 tests for them. Recognizing them is pretty cheap.
While there make use of APInt:isSignedMinValue/isSignedMaxValue
instead of creating a new APInt to compare with. Also use
SelectionDAG::getAllOnesConstant helper to hide the all ones
APInt creation.
Follow-up to D82716 / rGea71ba11ab11
We do not have the fabs removal fold in IR yet for the case
where the sqrt operand is repeated, so that's another potential
improvement.
As mentioned on D85463, we should be using SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits (which is the default fallback).
The minor regression in illegal-bitfield-loadstore.ll will be addressed properly by D77804.
One of the callers only wants the condition, but the vselect can
be simplified by getNode making it hard or impossible to retrieve
the condition.
Instead, return the condition and make the other 2 callers
responsible for creating the vselect node using the condition.
Rename the function to WidenVSELECTMask accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85468
This allows us to remove extra patterns from AArch64SVEInstrInfo.td
because we can reuse those required for fixed length vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85328
We currently don't do anything to fold any_extend vector loads as no target has such an instruction.
Instead I've added support for folding to a zextload, SimplifyDemandedBits does a good job of adjusting the zext(truncate(()) stages as required later on.
We still need the custom scalar extload handling instead of using the tryToFoldExtOfLoad helper as it has different legality tests - we can probably tweak that to reduce most of the code duplication.
Fixes the regression I mentioned in rG99a971cadff7
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85129
This corresponds with the SelectionDAGISel change in D84056.
Also, rename some poorly named tests in CodeGen/X86/fast-isel-fneg.ll with NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85149
The custom lowering saves an instruction over the generic expansion, by
taking advantage of the fact that PowerPC shift instructions are well
defined in the shift-by-bitwidth case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83948
This patch stops unconditionally transforming FSUB(-0,X) into an FNEG(X) while building the DAG. There is also one small change to handle the new FSUB(-0,X) similarly to FNEG(X) in the AMDGPU backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84056
Try to be more consistent with the SDLoc param in the TargetLowering methods.
This also exposes an issue where we were passing a SDNode as a SDLoc, relying on the implicit SDLoc(SDNode) constructor.
Just the obvious implementation that rewrites the result type. Also fix
warning from EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR legalization that triggers on the test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84706
This fixes an assertion failure that was being triggered in
SelectionDAG::getZeroExtendInReg(), where it was trying to extend the <2xi32>
to i64 (which should have been <2xi64>).
Fixes: rdar://66016901
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84884
This change is mechanical, it just removes the restriction and updates tests. The key building blocks were submitted in 31342eb and 8fe2abc.
Note that this (and preceeding changes) entirely subsumes D83965. I did includes a couple of it's tests.
From the codegen changes, an interesting observation: this doesn't actual reduce spilling, it just let's the register allocator do it's job. That results in a slightly different overall result which has both pros and cons over the eager spill lowering. (i.e. We'll have some perf tuning to do once this is stable.)
Change the way we track how a particular pointer was relocated at a statepoint in selection dag. Previously, we used an optional<location> for the spill lowering, and a block local Register for the newly introduced vreg lowering. Combine all three lowerings (norelocate, spill, and vreg) into a single helper class, and keep a single copy of the information.
This is submitted separately as it really does make the code more readible on it's own, but the indirect motivation is to move vreg tracking from StatepointLowering to FunctionLoweringInfo. This is the last piece needed to support cross block relocations with vregs; that will follow in a separate (non-NFC) patch.
This builds on 3da1a96 on the path towards supporting invokes and cross block relocations. The actual change attempts to be NFC, but does fail in one corner-case explained below.
The change itself is fairly mechanical. Rather than remember SDValues - which are inherently block local - immediately produce a virtual register copy and remember that.
Once this lands, we'll update the FunctionLoweringInfo::StatepointSpillMap map to allow register based lowerings, delete VirtRegs from StatepointLowering, and drop the restriction against cross block relocations. I deliberately separate the semantic part into it's own change for easy of understanding and fault isolation.
The corner-case which isn't quite NFC is that the old implementation implicitly CSEd gc.relocates of the same SDValue regardless of type. The new implementation still only relocates once, but it produces distinct vregs for the bitcast and it's source, whereas SelectionDAG's generic CSE was able to remove the bitcast in the old implementation. Note that the final assembly doesn't change (at least in the test), as our MI level optimizations catch the duplication.
I assert that this is an uninteresting corner-case. It's functionally correct, and if we find a case where this influences performance, we should really be canonicalizing types to i8* at the IR level.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84692
I have added tests to:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-intrinsics-int-arith.ll
for doing simple integer add operations on tuple types. Since these
tests introduced new warnings due to incorrect use of
getVectorNumElements() I have also fixed up these warnings in the
same patch. These fixes are:
1. In narrowExtractedVectorBinOp I have changed the code to bail out
early for scalable vector types, since we've not yet hit a case that
proves the optimisations are profitable for scalable vectors.
2. In DAGTypeLegalizer::WidenVecRes_CONCAT_VECTORS I have replaced
calls to getVectorNumElements with getVectorMinNumElements in cases
that work with scalable vectors. For the other cases I have added
asserts that the vector is not scalable because we should not be
using shuffle vectors and build vectors in such cases.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84016
In DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecOp_EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR I have replaced
calls to getVectorNumElements with getVectorMinNumElements, since
this code path works for both fixed and scalable vector types. For
scalable vectors the index will be multiplied by VSCALE.
Fixes warnings in this test:
sve-sext-zext.ll
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83198
Summary:
In parallelizeChainedStores, a TokenFactor was created with the size greater than 3000.
We found that DAGCombiner::visitTokenFactor will consume a huge amount of time on
such nodes. Since the number of operands already exceeds TokenFactorInlineLimit, we propose
to give up simplification with the consideration of compile time.
Reviewers:
@spatel, @arsenm
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D84204
(Disabled under flag for the moment)
This is part of a larger project wherein we are finally integrating lowering of gc live operands with the register allocator. Today, we force spill all operands in SelectionDAG. The code to do so is distinctly non-optimal. The approach this patch is working towards is to instead lower the relocations directly into the MI form, and let the register allocator pick which ones get spilled and which stack slots they get spilled to. In terms of performance, the later part is actually more important as it avoids redundant shuffling of values between stack slots.
This particular change adds ISEL support to produce the variadic def STATEPOINT form required by the above. In particular, the first N are lowered to variadic tied def/use pairs. So new statepoint looks like this:
reloc1,reloc2,... = STATEPOINT ..., base1, derived1<tied-def0>, base2, derived2<tied-def1>, ...
N is limited by the maximal number of tied registers machine instruction can have (15 at the moment).
The current patch is restricted to handling relocations within a single basic block. Cross block relocations (e.g. invokes) are handled via the legacy mechanism. This restriction will be relaxed in future patches.
Patch By: dantrushin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81648
In the included test case the align 16 allowed the v23f32 load to handled as load v16f32, load v4f32, and load v4f32(one element not used). These loads all need to be concatenated together into a final vector. In this case we tried to concatenate the two v4f32 loads to match the type of the v16f32 load so we could do a second concat_vectors, but those loads alone only add up to v8f32. So we need to two v4f32 undefs to pad it.
It appears we've tried to hack around a similar issue in this code before by adding undef padding to loads in one of the earlier loops in this function. Originally in r147964 by padding all loads narrower than previous loads to the same size. Later modifed to only the last load in r293088. This patch removes that earlier code and just handles it on demand where we know we need it.
Fixes PR46820
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84463
This adds the llvm.abs(), llvm.umin(), llvm.umax(), llvm.smin(),
and llvm.smax() intrinsics specified in D81829. For SelectionDAG,
the ISD opcodes and all the legalization and lowering already exist,
so this just wires them up to the intrinsic in the SDAG builder and
adds rudimentary tests. For GlobalISel only the min/max intrinsics
are wired up, as llvm.abs() will require the addition of a G_ABS op,
and corresponding legalization support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84125
On systems where size() doesn't return unsigned long, this leads to an
overloading mismatch. Convert the constant to whatever type is used for
Q.size() on the system.
Currently popFromQueueImpl iterates over all candidates to find the best
one. While the candidate queue is small, this is not a problem. But it
becomes a problem once the queue gets larger. For example, the snippet
below takes 330s to compile with llc -O0, but completes in 3s with this
patch.
define void @test(i4000000* %ptr) {
entry:
store i4000000 0, i4000000* %ptr, align 4
ret void
}
This patch limits the number of candidates to check to 1000. This limit
ensures that it never triggers for test-suite/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 on X86
and AArch64 with -O3, while still drastically limiting the compile-time
in case of very large queues.
It would be even better to use a binary heap to manage to queue
(D83335), but some heuristics change the score of a node in the queue
after another node has been scheduled. I plan to address this for
backends that use the MachineScheduler in the future, but that requires
a more careful evaluation. In the meantime, the limit should help users
impacted by this issue.
The patch includes a slightly smaller version of the motivating example
as test case, to guard against the issue.
Reviewers: efriedma, paquette, niravd
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84328
The AMDGPU handling of f16 vectors is terrible still since it gets
scalarized even when the vector operation is legal.
The code is is essentially duplicated between the non-strict and
strict case. Apparently no other expansions are currently trying to do
this. This is mostly because I found the behavior of
getStrictFPOperationAction to be confusing. In the ARM case, it would
expand strict_fsub even though it shouldn't due to the later check. At
that point, the logic required to check for legality was more complex
than just duplicating the 2 instruction expansion.
This isn't a natively supported operation, so convert it to a
mask+compare.
In addition to the operation itself, fix up some surrounding stuff to
make the testcase work: we need concat_vectors on i1 vectors, we need
legalization of i1 vector truncates, and we need to fix up all the
relevant uses of getVectorNumElements().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83811
MBBs are not allowed to have non-terminator instructions after the first
terminator. Currently in some cases (see the modified test),
EmitSchedule can add DBG_VALUEs after the last terminator, for example
when referring a debug value that gets folded into a TCRETURN
instruction on ARM.
This patch updates EmitSchedule to move inserted DBG_VALUEs just before
the first terminator. I am not sure if there are terminators produce
values that can in turn be used by a DBG_VALUE. In that case, moving the
DBG_VALUE might result in referencing an undefined register. But in any
case, it seems like currently there is no way to insert a proper DBG_VALUEs
for such registers anyways.
Alternatively it might make sense to just remove those extra DBG_VALUES.
I am not too familiar with the details of debug info in the backend and
would appreciate any suggestions on how to address the issue in the best
possible way.
Reviewers: vsk, aprantl, jpaquette, efriedma, paquette
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83561
In an upcoming AMDGPU patch, the scalar cases will be legal and vector
ops should be scalarized, rather than producing a long sequence of
vector ops which will also need to be scalarized.
Use a lazy heuristic that seems to work and improves the thumb2 MVE
test.
When the byref attribute is added, there will need to be two similar
functions for the existing cases which have an associate value copy,
and byref which does not. Most, but not all of the existing uses will
use the existing version.
The associated size function added by D82679 also needs to
contextually differ, and will help eliminate a few places still
relying on pointee element types.
Summary:
This patch modifies IncrementMemoryAddress to use a vscale
when calculating the new address if the data type is scalable.
Also adds tablegen patterns which match an extract_subvector
of a legal predicate type with zip1/zip2 instructions
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, david-arm
Reviewed By: efriedma, david-arm
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83137
The operands of a BUILD_VECTOR must all have the same type, so we can hoist this invariant condition out of the loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83882
Some of the system registers readable on AArch64 and ARM platforms
return different values with each read (for example a timer counter),
these shouldn't be hoisted outside loops or otherwise interfered with,
but the normal @llvm.read_register intrinsic is only considered to read
memory.
This introduces a separate @llvm.read_volatile_register intrinsic and
maps all system-registers on ARM platforms to use it for the
__builtin_arm_rsr calls. Registers declared with asm("r9") or similar
are unaffected.
The existing code already considered this case. Unfortunately a typo in
the condition prevents it from triggering. Also the existing code, had
it run, forgot to do the folding.
This fixes PR42876.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65802
ComputeNumSignBits and computeKnownBits both trigger "Scalable flag
may be dropped" warnings when a fixed length vector is extracted
from a scalable vector. This patch assumes nothing about the
demanded elements thus matching the behaviour when extracting a
scalable vector from a scalable vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83642
In DAGCombiner::TransformFPLoadStorePair we were dropping the scalable
property of TypeSize when trying to create an integer type of equivalent
size. In fact, this optimisation makes no sense for scalable types
since we don't know the size at compile time. I have changed the code
to bail out when encountering scalable type sizes.
I've added a test to
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-fp.ll
that exercises this code path. The test already emits an error if it
encounters warnings due to implicit TypeSize->uint64_t conversions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83572
We have this generic transform in IR (instcombine),
but as shown in PR41098:
http://bugs.llvm.org/PR41098
...the pattern may emerge in codegen too.
x86 has a potential refinement/reversal opportunity here,
but that should come later or needs a target hook to
avoid the transform. Converting to bswap is the more
specific form, so we should use it if it is available.
This carves out an exception for a pair of consecutive loads that are
reversed from the consecutive order of a pair of stores. All of the
existing profitability/legality checks for the memops remain between
the 2 altered hunks of code.
This should give us the same x86 base-case asm that gcc gets in
PR41098 and PR44895:
http://bugs.llvm.org/PR41098http://bugs.llvm.org/PR44895
I think we are missing a potential subsequent conversion to use "movbe"
if the target supports that. That might be similar to what AArch64
would use to get "rev16".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83567
This carves out an exception for a pair of consecutive loads that are
reversed from the consecutive order of a pair of stores. All of the
existing profitability/legality checks for the memops remain between
the 2 altered hunks of code.
This should give us the same x86 base-case asm that gcc gets in
PR41098 and PR44895:i
http://bugs.llvm.org/PR41098http://bugs.llvm.org/PR44895
I think we are missing a potential subsequent conversion to use "movbe"
if the target supports that. That might be similar to what AArch64
would use to get "rev16".
Differential Revision:
Summary:
Helper used when splitting load & store operations to calculate
the pointer + offset for the high half of the split
Reviewers: efriedma, sdesmalen, david-arm
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83577
fadd (fma A, B, (fmul C, D)), E --> fma A, B, (fma C, D, E)
This is only allowed when "reassoc" is present on the fadd.
As discussed in D80801, this transform goes beyond
what is allowed by "contract" FMF (-ffp-contract=fast).
That is because we are fusing the trailing add of 'E' with a
multiply, but without "reassoc", the code mandates that the
products A*B and C*D are added together before adding in 'E'.
I've added this example to the LangRef to try to clarify the
meaning of "contract". If that seems reasonable, we should
probably do something similar for the clang docs because
there does not appear to be any formal spec for the behavior
of -ffp-contract=fast.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82499
In DAGTypeLegalizer::SetSplitVector I have changed calls in the assert
from getVectorNumElements() to getVectorElementCount(), since this
code path works for both fixed and scalable vectors.
This fixes up one warning in the test:
sve-sext-zext.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83196
This patch replaces some invalid calls to getVectorNumElements() with calls
to getVectorMinNumElements() instead, since the code paths changed in this
patch work for both fixed and scalable vector types.
Fixes warnings in this test:
sve-sext-zext.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83203
Summary:
When legalizing a biscast operation from an fp16 operand to an i16 on a
target that requires both input and output types to be promoted to
32-bits, an assertion can fail when building the new node due to a
mismatch between the the operation's result size and the type specified to
the node.
This patches fix the issue by making sure the bit width of the types
match for the FP_TO_FP16 node, covering the difference with an extra
ANYEXTEND operation.
Reviewers: ostannard, efriedma, pirama, jmolloy, plotfi
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82552
This should be a typo introduced in D69275, which may cause an unknown
segment fault in getNode.
Reviewed By: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83376
9cac4e6d1403554b06ec2fc9d834087b1234b695/D32628 intended to eliminate
this, and move all isel pseudo expansion to FinalizeISel. This was a
bad rebase or something, and failed to actually delete this call.
GlobalISel also has a redundant call of finalizeLowering. However, it
requires more work to remove it since it currently triggers a lot of
verifier errors in tests.
It looks like 9cac4e6d14 accidentally
added a second copy of this from a bad rebase or something. This
second copy was added, and the finalizeLowering call was not deleted
as intended.
This removes existing code duplication and allows us to
assert that we are handling the expected cases.
We have a list of outstanding bugs that could benefit by
handling truncated source values, so that's a possible
addition going forward.
ExpandVectorBuildThroughStack is also used for CONCAT_VECTORS.
However, when calculating the offsets for each of the operands we
incorrectly use the element size rather than actual size and thus
the stores overlap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83303
Summary:
The following combine currently breaks in the DAGCombiner:
```
extract_vector_elt (concat_vectors v4i16:a, v4i16:b), x
-> extract_vector_elt a, x
```
This happens because after we have combined these nodes we have inserted nodes
that use individual instances of the vector element type. In the above example
i16. However this isn't a legal type on all backends, and when the combining pass calls
the legalizer it breaks as it expects types to already be legal. The type legalizer has
already been run, and running it again would make a mess of the nodes.
In the example code at least, the generated code is still efficient after the change.
Reviewers: miyuki, arsenm, dmgreen, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: miyuki, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, wdng, hiraditya, steven.zhang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83231
In DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_ExtendOp I have replaced an invalid
call to getVectorNumElements() with a call to getVectorMinNumElements(),
since the code path works for both fixed and scalable vectors.
This fixes up a warning in the following test:
sve-sext-zext.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83197
Calling getVectorNumElements() is not safe for scalable vectors and we
should normally use getVectorElementCount() instead. However, for the
code changed in this patch I decided to simply move the instantiation of
the variable 'OutNumElems' lower down to the place where only fixed-width
vectors are used, and hence it is safe to call getVectorNumElements().
Fixes up one warning in this test:
sve-sext-zext.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83195
`__stack_chk_fail` does not return, but `unreachable` was not generated
following `call __stack_chk_fail`. This had a possibility to generate an
invalid binary for functions with a return type, because
`__stack_chk_fail`'s return type is void and `call __stack_chk_fail` can
be the last instruction in the function whose return type is non-void.
Generating `unreachable` after it makes sure CFGStackify's
`fixEndsAtEndOfFunction` handles it correctly.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83277
This is inspired by D81648. The basic idea is to have the set of SDValues which are lowered as either constants or direct frame references explicit in one place, and to separate them clearly from the spilling logic.
This is not NFC in that the handling of constants larger than > 64 bit has changed. The old lowering would crash on values which could not be encoded as a sign extended 64 bit value. The new lowering just spills all constants > 64 bits. We could be consistent about doing the sext(Con64) optimization, but I happen to know that this code path is utterly unexercised in practice, so simple is better for now.
Summary:
When splitting a store of a scalable type, the new address is
calculated in SplitVecOp_STORE using a vscale and an add instruction.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, david-arm
Reviewed By: david-arm
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83041
Summary:
When splitting a load of a scalable type, the new address is
calculated in SplitVecRes_LOAD using a vscale and an add instruction.
This patch also adds a DAG combiner fold to visitADD for vscale:
- Fold (add (vscale(C0)), (vscale(C1))) to (add (vscale(C0 + C1)))
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, david-arm
Reviewed By: david-arm
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82792
This patch fixes all remaining warnings in:
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-trunc.ll
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-vector-splat.ll
I hit some warnings related to getCopyPartsToVector. I fixed two
issues:
1. In widenVectorToPartType() we assumed that we'd always be
using BUILD_VECTOR nodes to expand from one vector type to another,
which is incorrect for scalable vector types. I've fixed this for now
by simply bailing out immediately for scalable vectors.
2. In getCopyToPartsVector() I've changed the code to compare
the element counts of different types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83028
X / (fabs(A) * sqrt(Z)) --> X / sqrt(A*A*Z) --> X * rsqrt(A*A*Z)
In the motivating case from PR46406:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46406
...this is restoring the sequence that was originally in the source code.
We extracted a term from within the sqrt because we do not know in
instcombine whether a target will expand a sqrt call.
Note: we could say that the transform in IR should be restricted, but
that would not solve the problem if the source was originally in the
pattern shown here.
This is a gray area for fast-math-flag requirements. I think we should at
least check fast-math-flags on the fdiv and fmul because I view this
transform as 2 pieces: reassociate the fmul operands and form reciprocal
from the fdiv (as with the existing transform). We could argue that the
sqrt also needs FMF, but that was not required before, so we should change
that in a follow-up patch if that seems better.
We don't currently have a way to check that the target will produce a sqrt
or recip estimate without actually creating nodes (the APIs are SDValue
getSqrtEstimate() and SDValue getRecipEstimate()), so we clean up
speculatively created nodes if we are not able to create an estimate.
The x86 test with doubles verifies that we are not changing a test with
no estimate sequence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82716
Use a simpler code sequence when the shift amount is known not to be
zero modulo the bit width.
Nothing much uses this until D77152 changes the translation of fshl and
fshr intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82540
Using a negation instead of a subtraction from a constant can save an
instruction on some targets.
Nothing much uses this until D77152 changes the translation of fshl and
fshr intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82539
Sanjay Patel