This moves v32i16/v64i8 to a model consistent with how we
treat integer types with avx1.
This does change the ABI for types vXi16/vXi8 vectors larger than
512 bits to pass in multiple zmms instead of multiple ymms. We'd
already hacked some code to make v64i8/v32i16 pass in zmm.
Cost model is still a bit of a mess. In some place I tried to
match existing behavior. But really we need to account for
splitting and concating costs. Cost model for shuffles is
especially pessimistic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76212
If we're inserting into v2i8/v4i8/v8i8/v2i16/v4i16 style sub-128bit vectors ensure we don't use the SK_PermuteTwoSrc cost of the legalized value type - this is a followup to rG12c629ec6c59 which added equivalent sub-128bit shuffle costs
This tries to improve the accuracy of extract/insert element costs by accounting for subvector extraction/insertion for >128-bit vectors and the shuffling of elements to/from the 0'th index.
It also adds INSERTPS for f32 types and PINSR/PEXTR costs for integer types (at the moment we assume the same cost as MOVD/MOVQ - which isn't always true).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74976
D74976 will handle larger vector types, but since SLM doesn't support AVX+ then we will always be extracting from 128-bit vectors so don't need to scale the cost.
This is a follow-up to D70607 where we made any
extract element on SLM more costly than default. But that is
pessimistic for extract from element 0 because that corresponds
to x86 movd/movq instructions. These generally have >1 cycle
latency, but they are probably implemented as single uop
instructions.
Note that no vectorization tests are affected by this change.
Also, no targets besides SLM are affected because those are
falling through to the default cost of 1 anyway. But this will
become visible/important if we add more specializations via cost
tables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71023
I'm not sure what the effect of this change will be on all of the affected
tests or a larger benchmark, but it fixes the horizontal add/sub problems
noted here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59710?vs=227972&id=228095&whitespace=ignore-most#toc
The costs are based on reciprocal throughput numbers in Agner's tables for
PEXTR*; these appear to be very slow ops on Silvermont.
This is a small step towards the larger motivation discussed in PR43605:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43605
Also, it seems likely that insert/extract is the source of perf regressions on
other CPUs (up to 30%) that were cited as part of the reason to revert D59710,
so maybe we'll extend the table-based approach to other subtargets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70607
ShuffleVectorInst::isExtractSubvectorMask, introduced in
[CostModel] Add SK_ExtractSubvector handling to getInstructionThroughput (PR39368)
erroneously thought that
%340 = shufflevector <4 x float> %339, <4 x float> undef, <3 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3, i32 undef>
is a subvector extract, even though it goes off the end of the parent
vector with the undef index. That then caused an assert in
BasicTTIImplBase::getExtractSubvectorOverhead.
This commit fixes that, by not considering the above a subvector
extract.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70005
Change-Id: I87b8b00b24bef19ffc9a1b82ef4eca3b8a246eaf
Now that we're using widening legalization. We need to improve our extract_subvector cost model for these types. This patch begins by modeling these as a subvector extract followed by a permute. I've left FIXMEs in the code for future improvements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65892
llvm-svn: 369022
Instead of defaulting to a cost = 1, expand to element extract/insert like we do for other shuffles.
This exposes an issue in LoopVectorize which could call SK_ExtractSubvector with a scalar subvector type.
llvm-svn: 346656
Craig Topper